Research Article

Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes

Volume: 5 Number: 3 December 15, 2022
EN

Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes

Abstract

This study investigated the spoilage patterns and biopreservation of tomato paste by lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented milk products. All the isolates were screened for hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, and lactic acid production. Isolate with the highest mean values of evaluating parameters was selected as protective culture for the biopreservation. The isolate was identified as Lactococus lactis strain Ganee-5 using molecular techniques, and the sequences were submitted to the Genbank Database to obtain the accession number (MH571417). Antimicrobial properties of the protective culture were evaluated against some selected spoilage bacteria E. coli (ATCC 25922), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 15313), Salmonella typhimurium (IFO 12529), and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12600), Varying zone of inhibitions ranged from 18-25 mm were detected. The potato paste was preserved with L. lactis culture, sodium benzoate and control samples while the control samples were left without preservatives. All the experimental set-up was left for 16 days. Physicochemical and nutritional showed that tomato paste with L. lactis was preserved closely as much as sodium benzoate (p< 0.005). Therefore, L. lactis can be adopted for the preservation of the tomato paste to replace chemical preservatives.

Keywords

References

  1. Adalid, A.M., Salvador Rosello, S. and Nuez, F. (2010)Evaluation and selection of tomato accessions (Solanum section Lycopersicon) for content of lycopene, β-carotene and ascorbic acid. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 23 (2010): 613–618.
  2. Adebayo-Tayo, B.C. and Onilude, A.A. (2008). Screening of lactic acid bacteria strains isolates from some Nigeria fermented foods for EPS production. World Applied Sciences Journal 4(5): 741-47.
  3. Adubofuor, J., Aman Kwah, E.A., Arthur, B.S. and Appiah, F. (2010). Comparative study related to physicochemical properties and sensory qualities of tomato juice and cocktail juice produced from oranges, tomatoes and carrots. African Journal of Food Science, 4 (7): 427-433.
  4. Agharkar, M. S., Kochrekar S.T., Hidouri, D. F. and Azeez, M. A. (2014). Trends in green reduction of grapheme oxides, issues and challenges: A Review.Resources Bulletin, 59: 323- 324.
  5. Ahmed, F.A., Sipes, B. S., Anne, M. and Alvarez, A.M. (2017). Postharvest diseases of tomato and natural products for disease management. African Journal of Agricultural research, 12 (9): 684-691.
  6. AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. Washington, DC, USA.
  7. Awojobi, K. O., Adeyemo S. M., and Sanusi O. O. (2016). Biosynthesis of Antimicrobial Compounds by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Its Use as Biopreservative in Pineapple Juice. Frontiers in Science, 6 (1): 17-24.
  8. Awsi, J. and Dorcus, M. (2012). Development and Quality of Evaluation of Pineapple Juice Blend with Carrot and Orange Juices. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6: 1-8.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Food Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 15, 2022

Submission Date

March 23, 2022

Acceptance Date

May 6, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 5 Number: 3

APA
Ajao, A., & Alasinrin, G. (2022). Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, 5(3), 316-334. https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1091980
AMA
1.Ajao A, Alasinrin G. Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 2022;5(3):316-334. doi:10.38001/ijlsb.1091980
Chicago
Ajao, Abdullahi, and Ganiyat Alasinrin. 2022. “Assessment of the Protective Culture Potential of the Lactococcus Lactis Ganee-5 Strain As a Preservative Against Spoilage Bacteria in Tomato Pastes”. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology 5 (3): 316-34. https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1091980.
EndNote
Ajao A, Alasinrin G (December 1, 2022) Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology 5 3 316–334.
IEEE
[1]A. Ajao and G. Alasinrin, “Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes”, Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 316–334, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.38001/ijlsb.1091980.
ISNAD
Ajao, Abdullahi - Alasinrin, Ganiyat. “Assessment of the Protective Culture Potential of the Lactococcus Lactis Ganee-5 Strain As a Preservative Against Spoilage Bacteria in Tomato Pastes”. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology 5/3 (December 1, 2022): 316-334. https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1091980.
JAMA
1.Ajao A, Alasinrin G. Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 2022;5:316–334.
MLA
Ajao, Abdullahi, and Ganiyat Alasinrin. “Assessment of the Protective Culture Potential of the Lactococcus Lactis Ganee-5 Strain As a Preservative Against Spoilage Bacteria in Tomato Pastes”. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, vol. 5, no. 3, Dec. 2022, pp. 316-34, doi:10.38001/ijlsb.1091980.
Vancouver
1.Abdullahi Ajao, Ganiyat Alasinrin. Assessment of the protective culture potential of the Lactococcus lactis Ganee-5 strain as a preservative against spoilage bacteria in tomato pastes. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 2022 Dec. 1;5(3):316-34. doi:10.38001/ijlsb.1091980

Cited By



Follow us on social networks  19277 19276 20153  22366