Plant Probiotic Bacteria: Their Role on Plants and Applications

Abstract

Due to the increasing population, high demand against animal and vegetable nutrients has started to search for alternatives to chemical fertilizers as a result of increasing concerns about conservation of soil fertility. Plant probiotic bacteria, it is focused on protecting the environment, reducing the use of chemical fertilizers. Plant probiotic bacteria are soil bacteria that promote growth and colonize in the root zone. Inoculation of the plant with certain strains of plant probiotic bacteria has a direct effect on the growth of the plant's root and shoots, which increases biomass production. These bacteria also help to improve product quality. For this reason, these microorganisms called plant probiotic bacteria, are defined as environmentally friendly, which will contribute to the production of food and feed in order to sustain the world population with their use as biofertilizer. In this review, the mechanisms of rhizobacteria as plant probiotic bacteria on plant growth are summarized. 

Keywords

• Plant probiotic bacteria
• biofertilizer
• promoting plant growth
• active mechanisms

Bitki Probiyotik Bakteriler: Bitkiler Üzerindeki Rolleri ve Uygulamalar

Abstract

Artan nüfus dolayısıyla hayvansal ve bitkisel besin maddelerine karşı yüksek talep, toprak verimliliğinin korunması üzerine endişelerin artması sonucu kimyasal gübrelere alternatif arayışları başlatmıştır. Bitki probiyotik bakteriler, kimyasal gübrelerin kullanımını azaltarak, çevre korunmasına odaklanmıştır. Bitki probiyotik bakteriler, gelişmeyi teşvik eden ve kök bölgesinde kolonize olan toprak bakterileridir. Bitkinin bitki probiyotik bakterilerin belirli suşları ile aşılanması, bitkinin kök ve sürgünlerin gelişimi üzerine doğrudan etki etmektedir, biyokütle üretimini arttırmaktadır. Bu bakteriler ayrıca, ürün kalitesinin artmasına da yardımcı olmaktadırlar. Bu nedenle, bitki probiyotik bakteriler olarak adlandırılan bu mikroorganizmalar, biyogübre olarak kullanımları ile dünya nüfusunun sürdürülebilmesi için gıda ve yemin üretimine katkıda bulunacak çevre dostu olarak tanımlanmışlardır. Bu derlemede, bitki probiyotik bakteriler olarak rizobakterilerin bitki gelişimi üzerindeki mekanizmaları özetlenmiştir

Keywords

• Bitki probiyotik bakteriler
• biyogübre
• bitki gelişimini teşvik
• aktif mekanizmaları

References

1. 1. Garcia-Fraile, P., E. Menendez, and R. Rivas, Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioeng., 2015. 2: p.183–205.
2. 2. Araus J, et al., Phenotyping and other breeding approaches for a New Green Revolution. J Integr Plant Biol., 2014. 56: p. 422–424.
3. 3. Garcia-Fraile, P., et al., (2012) Rhizobium promotes non-legumes growth and quality in several production steps: towards a biofertilization of edible raw vegetables healthy for humans. PLoS One, 2012. 7: p. 1-7.
4. 4. Flores-Felix, J.D., et al., Plants probiotics as a tool to produce highly functional fruits: the case of Phyllobacterium and vitamin C in strawberries. PLoS One, 2015. 10: p. 1-101.
5. 5. Haas, D., and C. Keel. Regulation of antibiotic production in root-colonizing Pseudomonas spp. and relevance for biological control of plant disease. Ann Rev Phytopathol., 2003. 41: p. 117–153.
6. 6. Kloepper, J., and M. Schrot, Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. France, 1978. 2: 879–882.
7. 7. Hardoim, P.R., et al., The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolucionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev., 2015. 79: p. 293–320.
8. 8. Suzaki, T. and Kawaguchi, M. Root nodulation: a development al program involving cell fate conversion triggered by symbiotic bacterial infection. Curr. Opin Plant Biol., 2014. 21:p. 16-22.

9. 9. Pawlowski, K., and K.N. Demchenko, The diversity of actinorhizal symbiosis. Protoplasma, 2012. 249: p. 967–979.
10. 10. Vessey, J.K., K. Pawlowski, and B. Bergman, Root-based N2-fixing symbioses: Legumes, actinorhizal plants, Parasponia sp. and cycads. Plant Soil, 2005. 274: p. 51–78.
11. 11. Bhattacharyya, P.N., and D.K. Jha, Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol., 2012. 28: p. 1327–1350. 12. Vejan, P., et al., Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability. Molecules, 2016. 21: p. 573-580.
12. 13. Malua, E., and N. Vassilev, A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol., 2014. 98: p. 6599–6607.
13. 14. Tejera, N. et al., Isolation and characterization of Azotobacter and Azospirillum strains from the sugarcane rhizosphere. Plant and Soil, 2005. 270: p. 223-232.
14. 15. Santi, C., D. Bogusz, and C. Franche, Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot., 2013. 111: p. 743–767.
15. 16. Nascimento, F.X., et al.,The role of rhizobial ACC deaminase in the nodulation process of leguminous plants. Int J Agron., 2016. 1: p.1-10
16. 17. Borriss, R. Bacillus, a plant-beneficial bacterium, In: Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2015. Springer International Publishing, 379–391.
17. 18. Jaiswal, D.K. et al., Potassium as an important plant nutrient in sustainable agriculture: a state of the art, In: Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, 2016, Springer India, 21–29.
18. 19. Velázquez, E., et al., Diversity of potassium-solubilizing microorganisms and their interactions with plants, In: Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, 2016. Springer India, 99–110.
19. 20. Sharma, S.B., et al., Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus, 2013. 2: p. 587-592.
20. 21. Bagyalakshmi, B., P. Ponmurugan, and S. Marimuthu, Influence of potassium solubilizing bacteria on crop productivity and quality of tea (Camellia sinensis). Afr J Agric Res., 2012. 7: p. 4250– 4259.
21. 22. Mishra, R.P., et al., Rhizobium-mediated induction of phenolics and plant growth promotion in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Curr Microbiol., 2006. 52: p. 383–389
22. 23. Duran, P., et al., Endophytic bacteria from selenium- supplemented wheat plants could be useful for plant-growth promotion, biofortification and Gaeumannomyces graminis biocontrol in wheat production. Biol Fert Soils, 2014. 50: p. 983–990.
23. 24. Ulloa-Ogaz, A.L., L.N. Munoz-Castellanos, and G.V. Nevarez-Moorillon, Biocontrol of phytopathogens: Antibiotic production as mechanism of control, In: Mendez-Vilas, A., The Battle Against Microbial Pathogens: Basic Science, Technological Advances and Educational Programs, 2015. 305–309.
24. 25. Boudjeko, T., et al., Streptomyces cameroonensis sp. nov., a Geldanamycin producer that promotes Theobroma cacao growth. Microbes Environ., 2017. 32: p. 24–31.
25. 26. Maksimov, I.V., R.R., Abizgildina, and L.I. Pusenkova, Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as alternative to chemical crop protectors from pathogens. Appl Biochem Microbiol., 2011. 47: p. 333–345.
26. 27. Taule, C., et al., The contribution of nitrogen fixation to sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), and the identification and characterization of part of the associated diazotrophic bacterial community. Plant Soil, 2012. 356: p. 35–49.
27. 28. Van Oosten, M.J., et al., Root inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum 76A enhances tomato plants adaptation to salt stress under low N conditions. BMC Plant Biol., 2018. 18: p. 205-211.
28. 29. Chebotar, V.K., et al., Endophytic bacteria in microbial preparations that improve plant development. Appl Biochem Microbiol., 2015. 51: p. 271–277.
29. 30. Grady, E.N., et al., Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review. Microb Cell Fact., 2016. 15: p. 203-217.
30. 33. Singh, R.P., and P.N. Jha, The PGPR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SBP-9 Augments Resistance against Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Wheat Plants. Front Microbiol., 2017.8: p. 1945-1960 .
31. 31. Sokolova, M.G., G.P. Akimova, and O.B. Vaishlya, Effect of phytohormones synthesized by rhizosphere bacteria on plants. App Biochem Microbiol., 2011. 47: p. 274–278.
32. 32. Spaepen, S., Plant Hormones Produced by Microbes, In: Lugtenberg, B., Editor, Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 247–256.
33. 34. Beneduzi, A., et al. Evaluation of genetic diversity and plant growth promoting activities of nitrogen-fixing bacilli isolated from rice fields in South Brazil. App Soil Ecol., 2008. 39: p. 311–320.
34. 35. Liu, F., et al., Cytokinin-producing, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that confer resistance to drought stress in Platycladus orientalis container seedlings. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol., 2013. 97: p. 9155–9164.
35. 36. Aloni, R., et al., Role of cytokinin and auxin in shaping root architecture: regulating vascular differentiation, lateral root initiation, root apical dominance and root gravitropism. Ann Bot., 2006. 97: p. 883–893.
36. 37. Bent, E., et al., Alterations in plant growth and in root hormone levels of lodgepole pines inoculated with rhizobacteria. Can J Microbiol., 2001. 47: p. 793–800.
37. 38. Bakaeva, M.D., S.P. Chetverikov, and O.N. Loginov, The new bacterial strain Paenibacillus sp. IB-1: A producer of exopolysaccharide and biologically active substances with phytohormonal and antifungal activities. App Biochem Microbiol., 2017. 53: p. 201–208
38. 39.Asaf, S., et al., Bacterial endophytes from arid land plants regulate endogenous hormone content and promote growth in crop plants: an example of Sphingomonas sp. and Serratia marcescens. J Plant Interact., 2017. 12: p. 31–38.
39. 40. Ghosh, P.K., S.K., Sen, and T.K. Maiti, Production and metabolism of IAA by Enterobacter spp. (Gammaproteobacteria) isolated from root nodules of a legume Abrus precatorius L. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol., 2015. 4: p. 296–303.
40. 41. Flores-Felix, J.D., et al., Use of Rhizobium leguminosarum as a potential biofertilizer for Lactuca sativa and Daucus carota crops. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci., 2013. 176: p. 876–882.
41. 42. Flores-Felix, J.D., et al., Rhizobium as plant probiotic for strawberry production under microcosm conditions. Symbiosis, 2015. 67: p. 25–32.
42. 43. Yanni, Y.G., et al., Assessment of the natural endophytic association between Rhizobium and wheat and its ability to increase wheat production in the Nile delta. Plant Soil, 2016. 407: p. 367–383.
43. 44. Kong, Z., et al., Effects of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase-overproducing Sinorhizobium meliloti on plant growth and copper tolerance of Medicago lupulina. Plant Soil, 2015. 391: p. 383–398.
44. 45. Araujo, F.F., A.A. Henning, and M. Hungria, Phytohormones and antibiotics produced by Bacillus subtilis and their effects on seed pathogenic fungi and on soybean root development. World J Microbiol Biotechnol., 2005. 21: p. 1639–1645.
45. 46. Dimkpa, C., et al., Hydroxamate siderophores produced by Streptomyces acidiscabies E13 bind nickel and promote growth in cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L.) under nickel stress. Can J Microbiol., 2008. 54: p. 163–172.
46. 47. Khan, A.L., et al., Bacterial endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 produces gibberellins and IAA and promotes tomato plant growth. J Microbiol., 2014. 52: p. 689–695.
47. 48. Magnucka, E.G., and S.J. Pietr, Various effects of fluorescent bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas containing ACC deaminase on wheat seedling growth. Microbiol Res., 2015. 181: p.112–119.
48. 49. Zahir, Z.A., et al., Comparative effectiveness of Pseudomonas and Serratia sp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt-stressed conditions. Arch Microbiol., 2009. 191: p. 415–424.
49. 50. Ghavami, N., et al., Effects of two new siderophore producing rhizobacteria on growth and iron content of maize and canola plants. J Plant Nutr., 2016. 40: p. 736–746.
50. 51. Gamalero, E., and B.R. Glick, Bacterial modulation of plant ethylene levels. Plant Physiol., 2015. 169: p. 13–22.
51. 52. Brigido, C., et al., Expression of an exogenous 1- aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene in Mesorhizobium spp. reduces the negative effects of salt stress in chickpea. FEMS Microbiol Lett., 2013. 349: p. 46–53.
52. 53. Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169: 30–39.
53. 54. Shaharoona, B., et al., Fertilizer-dependent efficiency of Pseudomonas for improving growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol., 2008. 79: p. 147–155.
54. 55. Zerrouk, I.Z., et al., A Pseudomonas strain isolated from date- palm rhizospheres improves root growth and promotes root formation in maize exposed to salt and aluminum stress. J Plant Physiol., 2016. 191: p. 111–119.
55. 56. Suarez, C., et al., Plant growth-promoting effects of Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus on summer barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salt stress. Appl Soil Ecol., 2015. 95: p. 23–30.
56. 57. Dastager, S.G., C.K. Deepa, and A. Pandey, Isolation and characterization of novel plant growth promoting Micrococcus sp NII-0909 and its interaction with cowpea. Plant Physiol Biochem., 2010. 48: p. 987–992.
57. 58. Panda, P., S. Chakraborty, and D.P. Ray, Screening of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria from tea rhizosphere soil based on growth performances under different stress conditions. Int J Biores Sci., 2016. 3: p. 39–56.
58. 59. Şahin, F., R.Çakmakçı, and F. Kantar, Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to inoculation with N2 fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant and Soil, 2004. 265: p. 123-129.
59. 60. Sangeeth, K.P., R.S. Bhai, and V. Srinivasan, Paenibacillus glucanolyticus, a promising potassium solubilizing bacterium isolated from black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) rhizosphere. J Spices Arom Crops, 2012. 21: p. 118-124.
60. 61. Zhang, C., and F. Kong, Isolation and identification of potassium solubilizing bacteria from tobacco rhizospheric soil and their effect on tobacco plants. Appl. Soil Ecology, 2014. 82: p.18-25.
61. 62. Saha, M., et al., Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: a review. Environ Sci Poll Res., 2016. 23: p. 3984–3999.
62. 63. Verma, V.C., S.K. Singh, and S. Prakash, Bio-control and plant growth promotion potential of siderophore producing endophytic Streptomyces from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. J Basic Microb., 2011. 51: p. 550–556.
63. 64. Karagöz, K., et al., Characterization of plant growth promoting traits of bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of grapevine grown in alkaline and acidic soils. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2016. 50: p. 144-150.
64. 65. Wang, W., B. Vinocur, and A. Altman, Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 2003. 218: p. 1–14.
65. 66. Liddycoat, S.M., B.M. Greenberg, D.J. Wolyn, The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on asparagus seedlings and germinating seeds subjected to water stress under greenhouse conditions. Can J Microbiol., 2009. 55: p. 388–394.
66. 67. Paul, D., and S. Nair, Stress adaptations in a Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacterium (PGPR) with increasing salinity in the coastal agricultural soils. J Basic Microbiol., 2008. 48:p. 378–384.
67. 68. El-Akhal, M.R., et al., Effects of salt stress and rhizobial inoculation on growth and nitrogen fixation of three peanut cultivars. Plant Biol (Stuttg), 2013. 15: p. 415–421.
68. 69. Ma, Y., M. Rajkumar, and H. Freitas, Isolation and characterization of Ni mobilizing PGPB from serpentine soils and their potential in promoting plant growth and Ni accumulation by Brassica spp. Chemosphere, 2009. 75: p. 719–725.
69. 70. Carrillo-Castaneda, G., et al., Plant growth-promoting bacteria promote copper and iron translocation from root to shoot in alfalfa seedlings. J Plant Nutr., 2002. 26: p. 1801–1814.
70. 71. Kumar, H., V.K. Bajpai, and R.C. Dubey, Wilt disease management and enhancement of growth and yield of Cajanus cajan (L) var. Manak by bacterial combinations amended with chemical fertilizer. Crop Protect, 2010. 29: p. 591–598.
71. 72. El-Tarabily, K.A. Rhizosphere-competent isolates of streptomycete and non-streptomycete actinomycetes capable of producing cell-wall-degrading enzymes to control Pythium aphanidermatum damping-off disease of cucumber. Can J Bot., 2006. 84: p. 211–222.
72. 73. Martínez-Hidalgo, P., J.M. Garcia, and M.J. Pozo, Induced systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea by Micromonospora strains isolated from root nodules. Front Microbiol., 2015. 6: p. 1-11.
73. 74. Sharma, I.P., and A.K. Sharma, Effective control of root-knot nematode disease with Pseudomonad rhizobacteria filtrate. Rhizosphere, 2017. 3: p. 123–125.
74. 75. Yu, X., et al., The siderophore-producing bacterium, Bacillus subtilis CAS15, has a biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt and promotes the growth of pepper. Eur J Soil Biol., 2011. 47: p. 138–145.
75. 76. Herrera, S.D., et al., Wheat seeds harbour bacterial endophytes with potential as plant growth promoters and biocontrol agents of Fusarium graminearum. Microbiol Res., 2016. 186: p. 37–43.