Year 2020, Volume 4 , Issue 8, Pages 337 - 347 2020-09-15

KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI
COLLECTIVE JUSTICE CONCEPT

Taşkın KILIÇ [1] , Asli̇ KAYA [2] , Soner ÖZARAZ [3]


İlgili yazında örgütsel adalet kavramını ele alan kuram ve modeller, konuya bireyci bir perspektifle yaklaşıp sadece bireyin kendisine dönük olan adalet uygulamalarını ele almaktadırlar. Oysa içerisinde bulunduğu grup ve örgütle ilişkili konumda olan birey, sadece kendisine karşı değil grubun diğer üyelerine karşı sergilenen tutum ve davranışlardan da etkilenme potansiyeline sahiptir. Bu çalışmada, bireylerin örgütsel adalet algıları oluşurken kendisi ile örgüt arasındaki bireysel mübadelenin yanında, kolektif olarak diğer örgüt üyelerine karşı yapılan adalet uygulamalarının; bireyin adalet algıları üzerinde belirleyici rolünün olup olmadığı sorgulanmakta ve örgütsel adalet kavramına “kolektif adalet” adıyla yeni bir boyut eklenerek kavramın bütünsel olarak açıklanması amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın teorik bölümü mevcut yazındaki kuramlarla, saha araştırması ise kolektif ve grup çalışmalarının yoğunlukla yapıldığı sağlık sektöründe çalışan 307 kişi ile basit tesadüfi örneklem tekniğine göre yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda örgütsel adalet algısının sadece bireye dönük uygulamaları referans alarak açıklanamayacağı; kolektif ve grup düzeyindeki algılarında bu modele dahil edilmesi gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Buna ek olarak mevcut adalet ölçeği ile birlikte kolektif adalet algısını içeren ifadelerin yer aldığı ölçek alan araştırması ile sınanmış ve üç boyutlu örgütsel adalet modeline göre, kolektif adalet boyutunun eklenmesi ile dört boyutlu modelin bilimsel olarak daha iyi uyum iyiliği değerlerine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Theories and models discussing the organizational justice concept in the relevant literature approach to the issue from an individualistic perspective and deal only with justice applications directed to the individual. However, the individual who is related to her/his group and organization has a potential of being affected by attitudes and behaviors displayed against not only herself/himself, but also against other members of the group. This study questions whether the individual exchange between individuals and organization and the justice applications collectively performed against other organization members have a determinant role on individuals’ justice perception or not when their organizational justice perception is formed and aims to explain the organizational justice concept integrally by adding a new dimension to the concept with the name “collective justice”. The theoretical section of the study was conducted with theories in the present literature, while the field research was conducted with 307 individuals working in health sector where collective and group studies are performed intensely, via the simple random sampling technique. As a result of the study it was determined that the organizational justice perception may not be explained only by taking individual-related applications as a reference and collective and group-level perceptions also had to be included in this model. In addition the present justice scale and the scale containing statements concerning the collective justice perception were examined via the field research. According to the three-dimensional organizational justice model it was determined that when the collective justice dimension was added, the four-dimensional model had scientifically better goodness of fit indexes. 

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations o thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Bandura, A.(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of contWorth Publishers,New York,USA.Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy, American Pyschological Society, Volume 9, Number 3.
  • Beugre, C.D. (1998). Managing fairness in organizations. Greenwood Pub. Gr, Westport, CT, USA.
  • Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Colquitt.A.J., Conlon,D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, O.L.H., Yee Ng,K.(2001). Justice at the millennium. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86:425-445.
  • Colquitt, J. A., (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3).
  • Cihangiroğlu, N , Yılmaz, A . (2010). Çalışanların örgütsel adalet algısının örgütler için önemi. Sosyal Ekonomi Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10 (19), 194-213. Folger,R.(1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions distributive and procedural justice effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22. 531-546.141
  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
  • Hayashi, Y., Sekiguch,T. (2006). Collective justice perceptions in group-oriented cultures: proposal of a new construct, Japanese Journal of Administrative Science Volume,19, No.3, 207-219
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: comparing values, behaviours, ınstitutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage Publications.
  • Kernan, M.C.; Hanges, P.J. (2002). Survivor reactions to reorganization: antecedents and consequences of procedural, ınterpersonal and ınformational justice, Journal of Applied Psychlogy, 87(5), s.916-928.
  • Kılıç,T., Bostan,S., Grabowski, W. (2015). A new approach to the organizational justice concept: the collective level of justice perceptions. International Journal of Health Sciences March, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 157-175. Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide To Factor Analysis:. New York: Routledge
  • Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, Vol 36(4), 343-356.
  • Leventhal, G.S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.). Advances in Experimental Soc. Psy, Vol 9 (pp. 91-131). New York: Academic Press
  • Lind, E.A., Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
  • Lewin, K. (1948) Resolving social conflicts; selected papers on group dynamics. Gertrude W. Lewin (ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1948.
  • Marcus, J., Kahraman, F., Su, S., & Fritzsche, B. A. , (2019). Individualism and Collectivism across 81 provinces in Turkey . 27. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Antalya, Turkey
  • Noer, D. (1993). Healing the wounds. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Niehoff, Brian, P.I Moorman, Robert H. (1993). Justiee as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and org. al citizenship behavior, Acadey Of Manag. Journal, 36/3: 527-556.
  • Polat,S; Ceep,C.(2008). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet, örgütsel güven, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarına ilişkin algılar, Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, Sayı 54, ss: 307-331
  • Rotter, J. R.(1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ruder, Gary, J. (2003), The relationship among organizational justice, trust and role breadth self-efficacy, doctoral thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virgina.
  • Seymen. O. A. Kılıç, T. Saç, O. (2013). Örgütsel adalet algısının oluşmasında başkalarına dönük uygulamaların anlamlı etkisi var mıdır? 21. Yönetim Ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 30 Mayıs 01 Haziran 2013, Kütahya,526-531
  • Simmel,G.(1909). The problem of sociology American Journal of Sociology 15,p289-320.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Stouffer, S.A. (1949). The american soldier: adjustment during army life, Oxford University Press.Volume-ii. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.118733/page/n25
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Giriş, Temel İlkeler Ve Lısrel Uygulamaları, Ekinoks Yayınları
  • Tajfel, H.-Turner, J. C.: (1979). An ıntegrative theory of ıntergroup conflict.In W. G. Austin& S. Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi, Kaan Kitap Evi, Eskişehir, S. 523
  • Weick,K.E,Roberts,K (1993).Collective mind in org.: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Ad. Sci Q 38:357–381
Primary Language tr
Subjects Management
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author: Taşkın KILIÇ (Primary Author)
Institution: ORDU UNIVERSITY
Country: Turkey


Author: Asli̇ KAYA
Institution: Sağlık Bakanlığı Bursa İli Sağlık Müdürlüğü
Country: Turkey


Author: Soner ÖZARAZ
Institution: GÜMÜŞHANE SAĞLIK YÜKSEKOKULU
Country: Turkey


Dates

Publication Date : September 15, 2020

Bibtex @research article { ijma735287, journal = {International Journal of Management and Administration}, issn = {}, eissn = {2587-1668}, address = {}, publisher = {Cenk AKSOY}, year = {2020}, volume = {4}, pages = {337 - 347}, doi = {10.29064/ijma.735287}, title = {KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI}, key = {cite}, author = {Kılıç, Taşkın and Kaya, Asli̇ and Özaraz, Soner} }
APA Kılıç, T , Kaya, A , Özaraz, S . (2020). KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI . International Journal of Management and Administration , 4 (8) , 337-347 . DOI: 10.29064/ijma.735287
MLA Kılıç, T , Kaya, A , Özaraz, S . "KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI" . International Journal of Management and Administration 4 (2020 ): 337-347 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijma/issue/56767/735287>
Chicago Kılıç, T , Kaya, A , Özaraz, S . "KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI". International Journal of Management and Administration 4 (2020 ): 337-347
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI AU - Taşkın Kılıç , Asli̇ Kaya , Soner Özaraz Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.29064/ijma.735287 DO - 10.29064/ijma.735287 T2 - International Journal of Management and Administration JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 337 EP - 347 VL - 4 IS - 8 SN - -2587-1668 M3 - doi: 10.29064/ijma.735287 UR - https://doi.org/10.29064/ijma.735287 Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 International Journal of Management and Administration KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI %A Taşkın Kılıç , Asli̇ Kaya , Soner Özaraz %T KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI %D 2020 %J International Journal of Management and Administration %P -2587-1668 %V 4 %N 8 %R doi: 10.29064/ijma.735287 %U 10.29064/ijma.735287
ISNAD Kılıç, Taşkın , Kaya, Asli̇ , Özaraz, Soner . "KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI". International Journal of Management and Administration 4 / 8 (September 2020): 337-347 . https://doi.org/10.29064/ijma.735287
AMA Kılıç T , Kaya A , Özaraz S . KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI. IJMA. 2020; 4(8): 337-347.
Vancouver Kılıç T , Kaya A , Özaraz S . KOLEKTİF ADALET KAVRAMI. International Journal of Management and Administration. 2020; 4(8): 337-347.