AKILLI KENTLER VE YAŞAM LABORATUVARLARI (LIVING LABS): BAŞAKŞEHİR YAŞAM LABORATUVARI ÖRNEĞİNDE BİR İNCELEME

Levent Memiş; Hülya Küçük Bayraktar

doi:10.17130/ijmeb.853565

AKILLI KENTLER VE YAŞAM LABORATUVARLARI (LIVING LABS): BAŞAKŞEHİR YAŞAM LABORATUVARI ÖRNEĞİNDE BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Çalışmanın konusunu yaşam laboratuvarlarının (YL) bir örneğini teşkil eden Başakşehir Yaşam Laboratuvarı (BYL) oluşturmaktadır. BYL, örnek olay araştırma tasarımı kapsamında, genel düzeyde yapı ve işleyiş olarak incelenmektedir. Araştırmanın genel sonuçlarına göre, BYL’nin oluşumu, güçlü başkan modelinin etkisi altında Başakşehir Belediye Başkanı’nın girişimiyle 2011 yılında kurulumu gerçekleşmiş ve 2014 yılında aktif faaliyete geçmiştir. BYL’nin bütçesi Başakşehir Belediyesi (BB) tarafından karşılanmakta ve yönetimi, özel sektöre yıllık olarak ver-ilmektedir. BYL’nin sunduğu imkânlar, fiziksel ortamdaki çalışmaları öne çıkarmakta ve çeşitli çabaların sergilendiği görülmektedir. Diğer taraftan BYL’nin bulunduğu yerleşim alanının dışına da (il içi ve il dışı) yansımaları olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca bu iş birliği süreçlerinde eğitim kurumlarının varlığı dikkat çekmektedir. Sonuç olarak BYL, bazı sorun alanlarını barındırmakla birlikte, örnek bir uygulamaya karşılık gelmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

Abeysinghe, Y. N. (2016). Contribution of living labs for territorial development and innovation (Master’sThesis). Tallinn University of Technology School of Information Technologies Department of Software Science, Erişim Tarihi: 10. 04. 2019, https://digi.lib.ttu.ee/i/file. php?DLID=7963&t=1.
Almirall, E. & Wareham, J. (2011). Living labs: Arbiters of mid and ground-level innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23 (1), 87-102.
Angelini, L., Carrino, S., Khaled, O. A., Riva-Mossman, S., & Mugellini, E. (2016). Senior living lab: An ecological approach to foster social innovation in an ageing society. Future Internet, 8 (50), 1-19.
Baccarne, B., Mechant, P., Schuurman, D., Colpaert, P., & De Marez, L. (2014b). Urban socio-technical innovations with and by citizens. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3 (4), 143-156.
Bakker, F. C., Mensen, M., Harps-Timmermann, A. & Smits, C. (2017). An interdisciplinary community lab to facilitate citizen’s participation and health: An exploratory study in developing lab tools for research, Education and Practice in Nursing, Social Work and Gerontology, Research Day Conference proceedings, 21-29, Erişim Tarihi: 20. 04. 2019, https://issuu.com/enoll/docs/ olld_2017_conference_proceedings_.
Ballon, P., Hoed, M. V., & Schuurman, D. (2018).The efectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: measuring the impact of living labs. Telematics and Informatics, 35 (5), 1201-1214.
Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., & Amitrano, C. C. (2017). Co-Governing smart cities through living labs. Top evidences from EU. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 21-37.
Brask, M. (2015). The Role of urban living labs in fostering sustainable cities– Insights from Sweden (Thesis For Masters Degree). Environmental Science Applied Climate Change Strategies Lund University, Erişim Tarihi: 10. 04. 2019, https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/ publication/7368853.

Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., vanSteenbergen, F., & Palgan, Y. V. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17.
Canzler, W., Engels, F., Rogge, J. C. & Simon, D. (2017). From “living lab” to strategic action field: Bringing Together energy, mobility, and information technology in Germany. Energy Research&Social Science, 27, 25-35.
Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. & DiFeliciantonio, C. (2018). Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities, 73, 44-50.
Casciola, L. C. (2016). Increasing diverses take holderin clusion in an urban living lab: An experiment in design activism (Master’sThesis). Aalborg UniversityCopenhagen.
Coenen, T., van der Graaf, S., & Walravens, N. (2014). Firing up th ecity – a smart city living lab methodology. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3 (4), 1-11.
Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K. & Tryfonas, T. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information market places: a systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 668 – 677.
Curtis, S. (2015). An investigation of living labs for sustainability reflections on the living lab methodology, Applied Research in Sustainable Consumption and Production (ARSCP) Master of Science in Environmental Management and Policy Lund, Sweden.
Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensiveproposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11 (5), 2544-2551.
Evans, J., Bulkeley, H., Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K. & Curtis, S. (2018). Urban living labs and the politics of sustainability. In K.Ward, A. E.G. Jonas, B. Miller, D. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on spaces of urban politics (pp. 416-425). New York:Routledge.
Folstad, A. (2008). Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: A literature review. The Electronic Journalfor Virtual Organizationsand Networks, 10, 99-131.
Folstad, A.& Karahasanović, A. (2015). A guideto online applications for user involvement in living lab innovation. Information Resources Management Association, Economics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (IGI Global), 3, 426-444.
Franz, Y. (2015). Designing social living labs in urban research. Info, 17, 4, 53-66. Gasco, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 90–98.
Graczyk, P. (2015). Embedding a living lab approach at the University of Edinburgh. Department for Social Responsibility and Sustainability, Erişim Tarihi: 20. 04. 2019, https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/ atoms/files/embedding_a_living_lab_approach_at_the_university_of_edinburgh.pdf.
Habibipour, A. (2018). Living lab research: A state-of-the-art review and steps towards a research agenda. Erişim Tarihi 20. 04. 2019, http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1239574 &dswid=-3362.
Herselman, M., Marais, M. & Pitse-Boshomane, M. (2010). Applying living lab methodology to enhance skills in innovation. eSkillsSummit 2010 Proceedings, 1-7.
Hossain, M., Leminen, S. & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of CleanerProduction, 213, 976-988.
Juujärvi, S. & Pesso, K. (2013). Actorroles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3 (11), 22-27.
Katzy, B.R. & Bücker, C. (2015). The organization of living labs: Coordinating activities for regional innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5 (9), 23-28.
Kviselius, N. Z., Ozan, H., Edenius, M. & Andersson, P. ( ? ): The evolution of living labs – Propositions for Improved Design and Further Research. 842-856, Erişim Tarihi: 22. 04. 2019, https://www. researchgate.net/publication/228653862_The_Evolution_of_Living_Labs-Propositions_for_ Improved_Design_and_Further_Research.
Leminen, S. & Westerlund, M. (2015). Incremental and radical service innovation in living labs. In MehdiKhosrow-Pour (ChiefEds.), Economics: Concepts, methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 445-459), United States:IGI Global.
Leminen, S. (2015). Living labs as ope nınnovation networks: Networks, roles and innovation outcomes (Doctoral Dissertations). Aalto University, School of Science Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Erişim Tarihi 16. 04. 2019, https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/17899.
Leminen, S., Nyström, A.-G., Westerlund, M. & Kortelainen, M. J. (2016). The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31 (6), 743-757. Lin, W. Y., Lin, C. T., Wang, Y. H. & Chen, R. T. (2012). The transformation of users in living lab construction: The case of eco-city living lab. International Journal of Automationand Smart Technology (AUSMT), 2 (3), 231-240.
Marvin, S., Bulkeley, H., Mai, L., McCormick, K. & Palgan, Y. V. (Eds.) (2018). Urban living labs: Experimenting with city futures (pp. 1-17), New York:Routledge.
Menny, M. (2016). Users as co-creators? an analysis of user ınvolvement in urban living labs. Thesis for the Fulfilment of the Master of Science in Environmental Management and Policy Lund, Sweden, Erişim Tarihi 10. 04. 2019, https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8893215.
Menny, M., Palgan, Y. V. & McCormick, Kes (2018). Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creat, GAIA 27/S1, 68–77.
McLoughlin, S., Maccani, G., Prendergast, D. & Donnellan, B. (2018). Living labs: A bibliometric analysis. Hawaii International Conference on SystemSciences (HICSS), Hawaii.
Mengual, M. P., Jonas, J. M., Schmitt-Rüth, S. & Danzinger, F. (2018). Tools for collaborating and interacting in living labs – An exploratory case study on JOSEPHS. ServDes2018, Erişim Tarihi: 14. 04. 2019, http://www.servdes.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/25.pdf.
Nesti, G. (2017). Co-production for Innovation: The Urban living lab experience, policy and society. Policy and Society, 37 (3), 1-16.
Öztürk, A. İ. (2019). Başlangıçtan Bugüne İstanbul’un Belediyeleri. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık. Paskaleva, K. A. (2011). Thesmartcity: A nex us for open innovation?. Intelligent Buildings International, 3 (3), 153-171.
Puerari, E., de Koning, J. I. J. C., vonWirth, T., Karré, P. M., Mulder, I. J. & Loorbach, D. A. (2018). Cocreation dynamics in urban livinglabs. Sustainability, 10, 1-18.
Rodrigues, M.& Franco, M. (2018). Importance of livinglabs in urban entrepreneurship: A Portuguesecasestudy. Journal of CleanerProduction, 180, 780-789.
Sadioğlu, U. & Erdinçler, R. E. (2018). Akıllı kentler ve Türk kentleri için politika önerileri. İçinde A. Mengi ve D. İşçioğlu (Ed.), Küreselleşme sürecinde yerel hizmet yerel siyaset (s.81-101), Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
Schuurman, D., De Marez, L. & Ballon, P. (2013). Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3 (11), 28-36.
Schuurman, D., De Marez, L. & Ballon, P. (2016). The impact of living lab methodology on open innovation contributions ando utcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6 (1), 7-16.
Scholl, C. & Kemp, R. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1 (4), 89–102.
Sharp, D. & Salter, R. (2017). Direct impacts of an urban living lab from the participants’ perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability, 9, 1-15.
Smas, L., Schmitt, P., Perjo, L. & Tunström, M. (2016). Positioning urban labs – a New Form of Smart Governance?. Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, 919-923, Erişim Tarihi: 01. 05. 2019.https://repository. corp.at/179/.
Steen, K. & van Bueren, E. (2017). Urban living labs: A living lab way of working. Erişim Tarihi 20. 04. 2019, https://amsterdamsmartcity.com/projects/a-living-lab-way-of-working.
Ståhlbröst, A., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. & Eriksson, C. I. (2015). Stakeholders in smart city living lab processes. Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico, Erişim Tarihi: 26. 04. 2019, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1006027/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Ståhlbröst, A. (2013). A living lab as a service: Creating value formicro-enterprisest hrough collaboration and innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3, 11, 37-42.
Westerlund, M., Leminen, S. & Rajahonka, M. (2018). A topic modelling analysis of living labs research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8 (7), 40-51.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Levent Memiş This is me
0000-0002-5438-691X
Türkiye

Hülya Küçük Bayraktar This is me
0000-0003-2885-8386
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 31, 2020

Submission Date

January 9, 2020

Acceptance Date

September 11, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 16 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.853565

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA74FC27TN

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Memiş, L., & Küçük Bayraktar, H. (2020). AKILLI KENTLER VE YAŞAM LABORATUVARLARI (LIVING LABS): BAŞAKŞEHİR YAŞAM LABORATUVARI ÖRNEĞİNDE BİR İNCELEME. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat Ve İşletme Dergisi, 16(4), 954-975. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.853565

AKILLI KENTLER VE YAŞAM LABORATUVARLARI (LIVING LABS): BAŞAKŞEHİR YAŞAM LABORATUVARI ÖRNEĞİNDE BİR İNCELEME

AKILLI KENTLER VE YAŞAM LABORATUVARLARI (LIVING LABS): BAŞAKŞEHİR YAŞAM LABORATUVARI ÖRNEĞİNDE BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Kentlerin Çocuklarından Çocukların Kentlerine: "Çocuk Dostu Akıllı Kentler"

AKILLI ŞEHİRLERDE VATANDAŞ KATILIMI: SİSTEMATİK BİR LİTERATÜR ANALİZİ

LIVING LABS EXPERIENCES IN TURKEY: EXAMPLES OF BAŞAKŞEHİR AND BODRUM

Citizen Participation in A Smart City: The Seoul Case