BibTex RIS Cite

A RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF INNOVATION DETERMINANTS ON EXPORT PERFORMANCE

Year 2018, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 897 - 917, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018445661

Abstract

The aim of the study reveals what are the determinants of innovation that impact on countries’ export performance. In this context, data from 36 countries in the European Innovation Scoreboard between the years 2008-2015 have been analyzed by panel data analysis in the study. According to the study results, there is a positive relationship between innovation and export performance. Moreover, it is inferred that human resources, intellectual assets, innovators, linkages and entrepreneurships are determinants of innovation which is effective on export performance. The study contributes to from the point of view the impact of innovation on export performance and what is the effect of these variables in literature

References

  • Amable, B., & Verspagen, B. (1995). The role of technology in market shares dynamics. Applied Economics, 27, 197-204.
  • Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-468.
  • Basile, R. (2001). Export behavior of italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: The role of innovation. Research Policy, 30, 1185-1201.
  • Becker, S. W., & Whisler, T. L. (1967). The innovative organization: A selective view of current theory and research. The Journal of Business, 40(4), 462-469.
  • Cumming, B. S. (1998). Innovation overview and future challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 21-29.
  • Çetinkaya Bozkurt, Ö., & Kalkan, A. (2014). Business strategies of SME’s, innovation types and factors influencing their innovation: Burdur model. Ege Academic Review, 14(2), 189-198.
  • Çütcü, İ., & Çelik, M. (2016). İnovasyonun tekstil ihracatına etkisi: Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgesi uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(5), 15-42.
  • Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “organizational lag”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
  • Elçi, Ş. (2006). İnovasyon: Kalkınmanın ve rekabetin anahtarı. Ankara: Nova Basın Yayın Dağıtım.
  • European Commission & Innometrics (2008). European ınnovation scoreboard 2008 comparative analyses of ınnıvation performance. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission & Innometrics (2009). Innovation union scoreboard 2009.Belgium: Cholore Free Paper.
  • European Commission & Innometrics (2010). Innovation union scoreboard 2009. Belgium: Cholore Free Paper.
  • European Commission (2011). Innovation union scoreboard 2011. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2012). Innovation union scoreboard 2012. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2013). Innovation union scoreboard 2013. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2014). Innovation union scoreboard 2014. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2015). Innovation union scoreboard 2015. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • Fisher, M. M., Frohlıch, J., & Gassler, H. (1993). An exploration into the determinants of patent activities: Some empirical evidence for Austria. Regional Studies, 28(1), 1-12.
  • Flynn, M., Dooley, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Cormican, K. (2003). Idea management for organizational innovation. International Journal of Innovaiton Management, 74 (4), 417-442.
  • Greenhalgh, C. (1990). Innovation and trade performance in the United Kingdom. The Economic Journal, 100(400), 105-118.
  • Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hughes, K. (1986). Exports and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hulst, N. V., Mulder, R., & Soete, L. (1991). Exports and technology in manufacturing industry. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127 (2), 246-264.
  • Işık, C., & Keskin, G. (2013). Bilgi ekonomilerinde rekabet üstünlüğü oluşturulması açısından inovasyonun önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 41- 57.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. 5. Baskı, Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Karaata, S. (2012). İnovasyonun ölçümünde yeni arayışlar. Rekabet Forumu Raporu, 1, 1-19.
  • Kasza, A. (2004, June).Innovation networks, policy networks and regional development in transition economies: a conceptual review and research perspectives. paper for EPSNET Conference.
  • Kumar, N., & Siddharthan, N. S. (1994). Technology, firm size and export behavior in developing countries. Journal of Developing Studies, 32, 288-309.
  • Lachenmaier, S., & Wossmann, L. (2006). Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Economic Papers, 58, 317-350.
  • Lambooy, J. (2005). Innovation and knowledge: Theory and regional policy. Europen Planning Studies, 13(8), 1137-1151.
  • Montobbio, F., & Rampa, F. (2005). The impact of technology and structural change on export performance in nine developing countries. World Development, 33(4), 527-547.
  • Narula, R., & Wakelin, K. (1998).Technological competitiveness, trade and foreign direct ınvestment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9, 373-387.
  • OECD (2006). Economic policy performance: Going for growth.ttp://www.keepeek.com/ Digital-Asset Management/oecd/economics/ economic -policy-reforms-2006_growth- 2006-en#page20 (Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2016)
  • OECD. (2007). Innovation and growth: Rationale for an innovation strategy. Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2016, http://www.oecd. org/science/inno/39374789.pdf
  • Pla-Barber, J., & Alegre, J. (2007). Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry. International Business Review, 16, 275-293.
  • Szeto, E. (2000). Innovation capacity: Working towards a mechanism for improving innovation within an inter-organizational network. The TQM Magazine, 12(2), 149-157.
  • Parthasarthy, R., & Hammond, J. (2002). Product innovation input and outcome: Moderating effects of the innovation process. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 75-91.
  • Rothman, J., Erlich, J., & Teresa, J. G. (1976). Promoting innovation and change in organizations and communities: A planning manual. New York: Wiley.
  • Sanyal, P. (2004). The role of innovation and opportunity in bilateral OECD trade performance. Review of World Economics, 140(4), 634-664.
  • Stone, A., Rose, S., Lal, B., & Shipp, S. (2008). Measuring innovation and intangibles: A business perspective. Washington: Science & Technology Policy Institute.
  • Tekin, E., & Hancıoğlu, Y. (2017). The effects on innovation on export in developing countries. Innovation and Global Issues in Social Sciences Congress, April 27-29, Patara, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 169-183.
  • Udwadia, F. E. (1990). Creativity and innovation in organizations: Two models and managerial implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 38(1), 65-80.
  • Uzay, N., Demir, M., & Yıldırım, E. (2012). İhracat performansı açısından teknolojik yeniliğin önemi: Türkiye imalat sanayi örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(1), 147-160.
  • Verspagen, B., & Wakelin, K. (1997). Trade and technology from a Schumpeterian perspective. International Review of Applied Economics, 11(2), 181-194.
  • Velmurugan, J. M., Kalaiselvan, D., Rameswari, P., & Sankar, K. (2013). Innovation and entrepreneurship in a global economy. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(2), 1-9.
  • Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26, 829-841.
  • Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2010). Innovation index and the innovation capacity of nations. Futures, 42, 247-253.
  • Yalçınkaya, Y. (2010). Bilginin farkındalık ve farklılığında organizasyonların gelecek alanı: İnovasyon. Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 24(3),373-403.
  • Yıldırım, S. (2011). İnovasyonun makroekonomik belirleyicileri. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(13), 53-68.
  • Yıldırım, E. & Kesikoğlu, F. (2012). Ar-Ge harcamaları ile ihracat arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri: Türkiye örneğinde panel nedensellik testi kanıtları. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 32(1), 165-180.

İNOVASYON BELİRLEYİCİLERİNİN İHRACAT PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2018, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 897 - 917, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018445661

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı ülkelerin ihracat performansı üzerinde etkili olan inovasyon belirleyicilerinin neler olduğunu ortaya koymaktır. Bu kapsamda çalışmada Avrupa İnovasyon Karnesi’nde yer alan 36 ülkenin 2008-2015 yılları arasındaki verileri panel veri analizi ile incelenmiştir. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre, inovasyon ile ihracat performansı arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca ihracat performansı üzerinde daha fazla etkili olan inovasyon belirleyicilerinin insan kaynağı, araştırma sistemleri, fikri varlıklar ile bağlantılar ve girişimcilik olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışma inovasyonun ihracat performansına etkisini ve bu etkiye sebep olan değişkenlerin neler olduğunu görmek açısından literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır.

References

  • Amable, B., & Verspagen, B. (1995). The role of technology in market shares dynamics. Applied Economics, 27, 197-204.
  • Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-468.
  • Basile, R. (2001). Export behavior of italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: The role of innovation. Research Policy, 30, 1185-1201.
  • Becker, S. W., & Whisler, T. L. (1967). The innovative organization: A selective view of current theory and research. The Journal of Business, 40(4), 462-469.
  • Cumming, B. S. (1998). Innovation overview and future challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 21-29.
  • Çetinkaya Bozkurt, Ö., & Kalkan, A. (2014). Business strategies of SME’s, innovation types and factors influencing their innovation: Burdur model. Ege Academic Review, 14(2), 189-198.
  • Çütcü, İ., & Çelik, M. (2016). İnovasyonun tekstil ihracatına etkisi: Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgesi uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(5), 15-42.
  • Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “organizational lag”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
  • Elçi, Ş. (2006). İnovasyon: Kalkınmanın ve rekabetin anahtarı. Ankara: Nova Basın Yayın Dağıtım.
  • European Commission & Innometrics (2008). European ınnovation scoreboard 2008 comparative analyses of ınnıvation performance. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission & Innometrics (2009). Innovation union scoreboard 2009.Belgium: Cholore Free Paper.
  • European Commission & Innometrics (2010). Innovation union scoreboard 2009. Belgium: Cholore Free Paper.
  • European Commission (2011). Innovation union scoreboard 2011. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2012). Innovation union scoreboard 2012. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2013). Innovation union scoreboard 2013. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2014). Innovation union scoreboard 2014. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • European Commission (2015). Innovation union scoreboard 2015. Belgium: Publications Office.
  • Fisher, M. M., Frohlıch, J., & Gassler, H. (1993). An exploration into the determinants of patent activities: Some empirical evidence for Austria. Regional Studies, 28(1), 1-12.
  • Flynn, M., Dooley, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Cormican, K. (2003). Idea management for organizational innovation. International Journal of Innovaiton Management, 74 (4), 417-442.
  • Greenhalgh, C. (1990). Innovation and trade performance in the United Kingdom. The Economic Journal, 100(400), 105-118.
  • Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hughes, K. (1986). Exports and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hulst, N. V., Mulder, R., & Soete, L. (1991). Exports and technology in manufacturing industry. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127 (2), 246-264.
  • Işık, C., & Keskin, G. (2013). Bilgi ekonomilerinde rekabet üstünlüğü oluşturulması açısından inovasyonun önemi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 41- 57.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. 5. Baskı, Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Karaata, S. (2012). İnovasyonun ölçümünde yeni arayışlar. Rekabet Forumu Raporu, 1, 1-19.
  • Kasza, A. (2004, June).Innovation networks, policy networks and regional development in transition economies: a conceptual review and research perspectives. paper for EPSNET Conference.
  • Kumar, N., & Siddharthan, N. S. (1994). Technology, firm size and export behavior in developing countries. Journal of Developing Studies, 32, 288-309.
  • Lachenmaier, S., & Wossmann, L. (2006). Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Economic Papers, 58, 317-350.
  • Lambooy, J. (2005). Innovation and knowledge: Theory and regional policy. Europen Planning Studies, 13(8), 1137-1151.
  • Montobbio, F., & Rampa, F. (2005). The impact of technology and structural change on export performance in nine developing countries. World Development, 33(4), 527-547.
  • Narula, R., & Wakelin, K. (1998).Technological competitiveness, trade and foreign direct ınvestment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9, 373-387.
  • OECD (2006). Economic policy performance: Going for growth.ttp://www.keepeek.com/ Digital-Asset Management/oecd/economics/ economic -policy-reforms-2006_growth- 2006-en#page20 (Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2016)
  • OECD. (2007). Innovation and growth: Rationale for an innovation strategy. Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2016, http://www.oecd. org/science/inno/39374789.pdf
  • Pla-Barber, J., & Alegre, J. (2007). Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry. International Business Review, 16, 275-293.
  • Szeto, E. (2000). Innovation capacity: Working towards a mechanism for improving innovation within an inter-organizational network. The TQM Magazine, 12(2), 149-157.
  • Parthasarthy, R., & Hammond, J. (2002). Product innovation input and outcome: Moderating effects of the innovation process. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 75-91.
  • Rothman, J., Erlich, J., & Teresa, J. G. (1976). Promoting innovation and change in organizations and communities: A planning manual. New York: Wiley.
  • Sanyal, P. (2004). The role of innovation and opportunity in bilateral OECD trade performance. Review of World Economics, 140(4), 634-664.
  • Stone, A., Rose, S., Lal, B., & Shipp, S. (2008). Measuring innovation and intangibles: A business perspective. Washington: Science & Technology Policy Institute.
  • Tekin, E., & Hancıoğlu, Y. (2017). The effects on innovation on export in developing countries. Innovation and Global Issues in Social Sciences Congress, April 27-29, Patara, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 169-183.
  • Udwadia, F. E. (1990). Creativity and innovation in organizations: Two models and managerial implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 38(1), 65-80.
  • Uzay, N., Demir, M., & Yıldırım, E. (2012). İhracat performansı açısından teknolojik yeniliğin önemi: Türkiye imalat sanayi örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(1), 147-160.
  • Verspagen, B., & Wakelin, K. (1997). Trade and technology from a Schumpeterian perspective. International Review of Applied Economics, 11(2), 181-194.
  • Velmurugan, J. M., Kalaiselvan, D., Rameswari, P., & Sankar, K. (2013). Innovation and entrepreneurship in a global economy. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(2), 1-9.
  • Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26, 829-841.
  • Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2010). Innovation index and the innovation capacity of nations. Futures, 42, 247-253.
  • Yalçınkaya, Y. (2010). Bilginin farkındalık ve farklılığında organizasyonların gelecek alanı: İnovasyon. Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 24(3),373-403.
  • Yıldırım, S. (2011). İnovasyonun makroekonomik belirleyicileri. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(13), 53-68.
  • Yıldırım, E. & Kesikoğlu, F. (2012). Ar-Ge harcamaları ile ihracat arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri: Türkiye örneğinde panel nedensellik testi kanıtları. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 32(1), 165-180.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Erol Tekin This is me

Yasemin Hancıoğlu This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 14 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Tekin, E., & Hancıoğlu, Y. (2018). İNOVASYON BELİRLEYİCİLERİNİN İHRACAT PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat Ve İşletme Dergisi, 14(4), 897-917. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018445661