PROAKTİF KİŞİLİK İLE PROAKTİF ÇALIŞMA DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNDE PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRMENİN ETKİSİ

Year 2017, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 425 - 438, 01.04.2017

İlknur Uncuoğlu Yolcu Ahmet Ferda Çakmak

https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2017228692

Cited By: 13

Abstract

Bu çalışmada proaktif kişiliğe sahip çalışanların proaktif çalışma davranışıgöstermelerinde psikolojik güçlendirmenin rolü araştırılmıştır. Çalışma Türkiye’deki KalkınmaAjanslarında görev yapan personelin proaktif kişilik yapılarının kişilerin proaktif çalışmadavranış göstermelerindeki etkisinde psikolojik güçlendirmenin anlamlı bir rolü olup olmadığınıbelirlemek amacı gütmektedir. Bu amaca yönelik olarak Kalkınma Ajansları çalışanlarındanveriler anket yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Oluşturulan modelde yer alan değişkenlerin doğrudanve düzenleyici etkilerini tespit etmek amacıyla hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır.Gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda proaktif kişiliğin proaktif çalışma davranışı ile olumluilişki içerisinde olduğu; psikolojik güçlendirmenin bu ilişkide düzenleyici etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.2

Keywords

Proaktif Kişilik, Proaktif Çalışma Davranışı, Psikolojik Güçlendirme

MEDIATING EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGIC EMPOWERMENT WORKERS IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF PROACTIVE PERSONALITY AND PROACTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

Abstract

In this study, the role of psychologic empowerment on workers’ proactive personality affecting proactive work behavior is investigated. The study aims to examine whether proactive personality structure of employees working for Development Agencies in Turkey has any effect on proactive work behavior, psychological empowerment perception of people. In line with this aim, data from Development Agencies is collected with survey method. Hierarchical regression analysis is used to define the direct and mediating effects of the variables in the model. As result, it is reviled that proactive personality and proactive work behavior has a positive relationship, moreover, psychological empowerment has a mediating effect on this relationship

Keywords

Proactive Personality, Proactive Work Behavior, Psychological Empowerment

References

• Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 207-242.
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
• Bateman, T., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates, Journal of Organizational Behavior.
• Bolino, M. C., Valcea, S., & Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentiallynegative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 325-345.
• Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory andpractice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
• Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents, Journal of Applied Psychology.
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
• Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 63- 75.
• Çelik, H. E., & Yılmaz, V. (2013). LISREL 9.1 ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi, temel kavramlar- uygulamalar-programlama. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580-590.
• Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B.M. Staw & R.I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133–187.
• Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63.
• Frese, M., & Fay, D. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliabilityand validity in two german samples, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
• Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review, 12(3), 472-485.
• Güney, S. (2006). Davranış bilimleri, Gözden Geçirilmiş 3. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Hui, C., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (1999). A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader-member exchange, and perceived job mobil ity on in-role and extra- role performance: A Chinese case. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 3-21.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2016). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (Vol. 7). Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
• LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–868.
• Luth, M. T. (2012). The bright and dark sides of empowerment: Linking psychological empowerment and job stressors to proactive and counterproductive work behaviors, (Doctoral dissertation), University of Kansas.
• Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403-419.
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662.
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work, Journal of Applied Psychology.
• Tabachnick, B. G, & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (Fourth Edition). Boston: Ally And Bacon.
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinates of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 137, 580- 607.
• Searle, T., P. (2011). A multilevel examination of proactive work behaviors: Contextual and individual differences as antecedents. In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy.
• Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L. & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success, Personnel Psychology 2001, 54.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the work place: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. Handbook of organizational behavior, 54-72.
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15 (4), 666-681.
• Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2010). Çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve iş stresinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş performansına etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 183-206.