BibTex RIS Cite

DETERMINANTS OF TOURIST INFLOWS IN TURKEY: EVIDENCE FROM PANEL GRAVITY MODEL

Year 2010, Volume: 6 Issue: 11, 33 - 46, 01.06.2010

Abstract

Turkey is one of the foremost destinations in the world and today, tourism sector has gained importance in the Turkish economy. With a tourism revenue of 16.9 billion USD, Turkey has placed 9th among the top 10 highest revenue earned countries. Nevertheless, it cannot be said that Turkey fully uses her tourism potential which stems from her geographical and historical wealth. Therefore, in order to develop the sector in a most planned and controlled manner, it is important to determine the factors which have impact on Turkey’s tourist inflows. In this paper, we aimed to investigate these effective factors based on a panel gravity model framework for the period of 1992-2007. Though the results are highly sensitive to the specification of the model both in terms of the significance and sign of the coefficients, all variables i.e. the economic size, population and distance seem to have significant effect on tourist inflows

References

  • Antonucci, Daniele and Stefano Manzocchi (2005), “Does Turkey have a Special Trade Relation with the EU? A Gravity Model Approach”, http://papers.ssrn.com /sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=609881 (14.7.2009).
  • Aslan, Alper, Muhittin Kaplan and Ferit Kula (2008), “International Tourism Demand for Turkey: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No.10601.
  • Bahar, Ozan (2006), “The Effect of Tourism Sector on the Economic Growth of Turkey: VAR Analysis Approach”, Celal Bayar University, FEAS, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 13 (2), pp.137-150 (In Turkish).
  • Batra, Amita (2004), India’s Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach, Working Paper No.151, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
  • Bos, J.W.B. ve M. van de Laar, (2004),Explaining Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: An Extended Gravity Approach, DNB Working Papers, 008, Netherlands Central Bank.
  • Bussiére, Matthieu and Bernd Schnatz (2006), Evaluating China’s Integration in World Trade with a Gravity Model Based Benchmark, Working Paper No.693, European Central Bank.
  • Durbarry, Ramesh (2000), “Tourism Expenditure in the UK: Analysis of Competitiveness Using a Gravity-based Model”, Christel DeHaan Tourism and Research Institute, Nottingham University, Research Paper, No. 2000/1.
  • Egger, Peter (2000), “A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation”, Economics Letters, 66, pp.25-31.
  • Egger, Peter (2005), “Alternative Techniques for Estimation of Cross-Section Gravity Models”, Review of International Economics, (13) 5, pp.881-891.
  • Eita, Joel H. ve Andre C. Jordaan (2007), “Estimating the Tourism Potential in Namibia”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No.5788, p.26
  • Gil-Pajera, Salvador, Rafael Llorca-Vivero and Jose A. Martinez-Serrano (2007), “The Effect of EMU on Tourism”, Review of International Economics, 15 (2).
  • Gündüz, Lokman and Abdulnaser Hatemi-J (2005), “Is the Tourism-led Growth Hypothesis Valid for Turkey?”, Applied Economics Letters, 12, pp.499-504.
  • Halıcıoğlu, Ferda (2004) “An ARDL Model of International Tourist Flows to Turkey”, Global Business and Economics Review 2004 Anthology, pp.614-624.
  • İçöz, Orhan., Turgut Var and Metin Kozak (1998) “Tourism Demand in Turkey”, Annals of Tourism Research, 25, pp.236-240.
  • Kaplan, Muhittin and Tuncay Çelik (2008), “The Impact of Tourism on Economic Performance: The Case of Turkey”, International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 2 (1), pp.13-18.
  • Karagöz, Murat, Ali Şen and Ali Koçyiğit (2007), “The Impact of External Shocks on Tourism Sector: The Case of Turkey”, Acta Turistica, 19 (1), pp.30-44.
  • Karagöz, Kadir (2008), “Tourism Potential of Turkey: Gravity Model Approach”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19 (2), pp. 1-8 (In Turkish).
  • Kozak, Nazmi, M.A. Kozak and M. Kozak (2000) General Tourism: Principles and Concepts, Turhan Publishing, Ankara (In Turkish).
  • Matias, Alvaro (2004), “Economic Geography, Gravity and Tourism Trade: The Case for Portugal”, A Paper Submitted to the I. Congress on Tourism Economics, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, 28-29 May 2004.
  • Porojan, A. (2000), Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited, University of Derby.
  • Simwaka, K. (2006), “Dynamics of Malawi’s Trade Flows: A Gravity Model Approach”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No.1122.
  • Tosun, Cevat (1999), “An Analysis of Contributions of International Inbound Tourism to the Turkish Economy”, Tourism Economics, 5, pp.217-250.
  • Tosun, Cevat (2001), “Challenges of Sustainable Development in the Developing World: The Case of Turkey”, Tourism Management, 22, pp.289-303.
  • Tosun, Cevat, D.J. Timothy and Y. Öztürk (2003), “Tourism Growth, National Development and Regional Inequality in Turkey”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11, pp.133-161.
  • UNWTO (United Nations – World Tourism Organization) (2009), Tourism Highlights – 2009 Edition.
  • Yıldırım, Jülide and Nadir Öcal (2004), “Tourism and Economic Growth in Turkey”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 15 (52-53), pp.131-141.
  • Zortuk, Mahmut (2009), “Economic Impact of Tourism on Turkey’s Economy: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 25, pp.232-239.
  • Appendix: Countries Included in the Sample.
  • Albania China Iceland Mexico Singapore
  • Argentina Colombia India Australia Austria Denmark Bangladesh Egypt
  • Belgium Finland Japan Brazil
  • Bulgaria Germany Lebanon Portugal Venezuela
  • Canada Greece Luxemburg Chile Hungary
  • Netherland Spain New Zealand Czech Rep. Iran Ireland
  • Israel Norway Switzerland Italy Sweden Pakistan
  • Philippines K. Poland U. S. A. France Jordan Romania Malaysia S. Arabia

TÜRKİYE’YE YÖNELİK TURİST AKIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ: PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİNDEN BULGULAR

Year 2010, Volume: 6 Issue: 11, 33 - 46, 01.06.2010

Abstract

Turkey is one of the foremost destinations in the world and today, tourism sector has gained importance in the Turkish economy. With a tourism revenue of 16.9 billion USD, Turkey has placed 9th among the top 10 highest revenue earned countries. Nevertheless, it cannot be said that Turkey fully uses her tourism potential which stems from her geographical and historical wealth. Therefore, in order to develop the sector in a most planned and controlled manner, it is important to determine the factors which have impact on Turkey’s tourist inflows. In this paper, we aimed to investigate these effective factors based on a panel gravity model framework for the period of 1992-2007. Though the results are highly sensitive to the specification of the model both in terms of the significance and sign of the coefficients, all variables i.e. the economic size, population and distance seem to have significant effect on tourist inflows.

References

  • Antonucci, Daniele and Stefano Manzocchi (2005), “Does Turkey have a Special Trade Relation with the EU? A Gravity Model Approach”, http://papers.ssrn.com /sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=609881 (14.7.2009).
  • Aslan, Alper, Muhittin Kaplan and Ferit Kula (2008), “International Tourism Demand for Turkey: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No.10601.
  • Bahar, Ozan (2006), “The Effect of Tourism Sector on the Economic Growth of Turkey: VAR Analysis Approach”, Celal Bayar University, FEAS, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 13 (2), pp.137-150 (In Turkish).
  • Batra, Amita (2004), India’s Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach, Working Paper No.151, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
  • Bos, J.W.B. ve M. van de Laar, (2004),Explaining Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: An Extended Gravity Approach, DNB Working Papers, 008, Netherlands Central Bank.
  • Bussiére, Matthieu and Bernd Schnatz (2006), Evaluating China’s Integration in World Trade with a Gravity Model Based Benchmark, Working Paper No.693, European Central Bank.
  • Durbarry, Ramesh (2000), “Tourism Expenditure in the UK: Analysis of Competitiveness Using a Gravity-based Model”, Christel DeHaan Tourism and Research Institute, Nottingham University, Research Paper, No. 2000/1.
  • Egger, Peter (2000), “A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation”, Economics Letters, 66, pp.25-31.
  • Egger, Peter (2005), “Alternative Techniques for Estimation of Cross-Section Gravity Models”, Review of International Economics, (13) 5, pp.881-891.
  • Eita, Joel H. ve Andre C. Jordaan (2007), “Estimating the Tourism Potential in Namibia”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No.5788, p.26
  • Gil-Pajera, Salvador, Rafael Llorca-Vivero and Jose A. Martinez-Serrano (2007), “The Effect of EMU on Tourism”, Review of International Economics, 15 (2).
  • Gündüz, Lokman and Abdulnaser Hatemi-J (2005), “Is the Tourism-led Growth Hypothesis Valid for Turkey?”, Applied Economics Letters, 12, pp.499-504.
  • Halıcıoğlu, Ferda (2004) “An ARDL Model of International Tourist Flows to Turkey”, Global Business and Economics Review 2004 Anthology, pp.614-624.
  • İçöz, Orhan., Turgut Var and Metin Kozak (1998) “Tourism Demand in Turkey”, Annals of Tourism Research, 25, pp.236-240.
  • Kaplan, Muhittin and Tuncay Çelik (2008), “The Impact of Tourism on Economic Performance: The Case of Turkey”, International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 2 (1), pp.13-18.
  • Karagöz, Murat, Ali Şen and Ali Koçyiğit (2007), “The Impact of External Shocks on Tourism Sector: The Case of Turkey”, Acta Turistica, 19 (1), pp.30-44.
  • Karagöz, Kadir (2008), “Tourism Potential of Turkey: Gravity Model Approach”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19 (2), pp. 1-8 (In Turkish).
  • Kozak, Nazmi, M.A. Kozak and M. Kozak (2000) General Tourism: Principles and Concepts, Turhan Publishing, Ankara (In Turkish).
  • Matias, Alvaro (2004), “Economic Geography, Gravity and Tourism Trade: The Case for Portugal”, A Paper Submitted to the I. Congress on Tourism Economics, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, 28-29 May 2004.
  • Porojan, A. (2000), Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited, University of Derby.
  • Simwaka, K. (2006), “Dynamics of Malawi’s Trade Flows: A Gravity Model Approach”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No.1122.
  • Tosun, Cevat (1999), “An Analysis of Contributions of International Inbound Tourism to the Turkish Economy”, Tourism Economics, 5, pp.217-250.
  • Tosun, Cevat (2001), “Challenges of Sustainable Development in the Developing World: The Case of Turkey”, Tourism Management, 22, pp.289-303.
  • Tosun, Cevat, D.J. Timothy and Y. Öztürk (2003), “Tourism Growth, National Development and Regional Inequality in Turkey”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11, pp.133-161.
  • UNWTO (United Nations – World Tourism Organization) (2009), Tourism Highlights – 2009 Edition.
  • Yıldırım, Jülide and Nadir Öcal (2004), “Tourism and Economic Growth in Turkey”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 15 (52-53), pp.131-141.
  • Zortuk, Mahmut (2009), “Economic Impact of Tourism on Turkey’s Economy: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 25, pp.232-239.
  • Appendix: Countries Included in the Sample.
  • Albania China Iceland Mexico Singapore
  • Argentina Colombia India Australia Austria Denmark Bangladesh Egypt
  • Belgium Finland Japan Brazil
  • Bulgaria Germany Lebanon Portugal Venezuela
  • Canada Greece Luxemburg Chile Hungary
  • Netherland Spain New Zealand Czech Rep. Iran Ireland
  • Israel Norway Switzerland Italy Sweden Pakistan
  • Philippines K. Poland U. S. A. France Jordan Romania Malaysia S. Arabia
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

M. Ozan Saray This is me

Kadir Karagöz This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 6 Issue: 11

Cite

APA Saray, M. O., & Karagöz, K. (2010). DETERMINANTS OF TOURIST INFLOWS IN TURKEY: EVIDENCE FROM PANEL GRAVITY MODEL. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat Ve İşletme Dergisi, 6(11), 33-46.