AKILLI KENTLER VE YAŞAM LABORATUVARLARI (LIVING LABS): BAŞAKŞEHİR YAŞAM LABORATUVARI ÖRNEĞİNDE BİR İNCELEME

Year 2020, Volume: 16 Issue: 4, 954 - 975, 31.12.2020

Levent Memiş Hülya Küçük Bayraktar

https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.853565

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Çalışmanın konusunu yaşam laboratuvarlarının (YL) bir örneğini teşkil eden Başakşehir Yaşam
Laboratuvarı (BYL) oluşturmaktadır. BYL, örnek olay araştırma tasarımı kapsamında, genel düzeyde yapı
ve işleyiş olarak incelenmektedir. Araştırmanın genel sonuçlarına göre, BYL’nin oluşumu, güçlü başkan
modelinin etkisi altında Başakşehir Belediye Başkanı’nın girişimiyle 2011 yılında kurulumu gerçekleşmiş
ve 2014 yılında aktif faaliyete geçmiştir. BYL’nin bütçesi Başakşehir Belediyesi (BB) tarafından
karşılanmakta ve yönetimi, özel sektöre yıllık olarak ver-ilmektedir. BYL’nin sunduğu imkânlar, fiziksel
ortamdaki çalışmaları öne çıkarmakta ve çeşitli çabaların sergilendiği görülmektedir. Diğer taraftan
BYL’nin bulunduğu yerleşim alanının dışına da (il içi ve il dışı) yansımaları olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca
bu iş birliği süreçlerinde eğitim kurumlarının varlığı dikkat çekmektedir. Sonuç olarak BYL, bazı sorun
alanlarını barındırmakla birlikte, örnek bir uygulamaya karşılık gelmektedir.

Keywords

Akıllı Kent, Yaşam Laboratuvarı, Yenilik, Başakşehir

References

• Abeysinghe, Y. N. (2016). Contribution of living labs for territorial development and innovation (Master’sThesis). Tallinn University of Technology School of Information Technologies Department of Software Science, Erişim Tarihi: 10. 04. 2019, https://digi.lib.ttu.ee/i/file. php?DLID=7963&t=1.
• Almirall, E. & Wareham, J. (2011). Living labs: Arbiters of mid and ground-level innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23 (1), 87-102.
• Angelini, L., Carrino, S., Khaled, O. A., Riva-Mossman, S., & Mugellini, E. (2016). Senior living lab: An ecological approach to foster social innovation in an ageing society. Future Internet, 8 (50), 1-19.
• Baccarne, B., Mechant, P., Schuurman, D., Colpaert, P., & De Marez, L. (2014b). Urban socio-technical innovations with and by citizens. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3 (4), 143-156.
• Bakker, F. C., Mensen, M., Harps-Timmermann, A. & Smits, C. (2017). An interdisciplinary community lab to facilitate citizen’s participation and health: An exploratory study in developing lab tools for research, Education and Practice in Nursing, Social Work and Gerontology, Research Day Conference proceedings, 21-29, Erişim Tarihi: 20. 04. 2019, https://issuu.com/enoll/docs/ olld_2017_conference_proceedings_.
• Ballon, P., Hoed, M. V., & Schuurman, D. (2018).The efectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: measuring the impact of living labs. Telematics and Informatics, 35 (5), 1201-1214.
• Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., & Amitrano, C. C. (2017). Co-Governing smart cities through living labs. Top evidences from EU. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, 21-37.
• Brask, M. (2015). The Role of urban living labs in fostering sustainable cities– Insights from Sweden (Thesis For Masters Degree). Environmental Science Applied Climate Change Strategies Lund University, Erişim Tarihi: 10. 04. 2019, https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/ publication/7368853.
• Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., vanSteenbergen, F., & Palgan, Y. V. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17.
• Canzler, W., Engels, F., Rogge, J. C. & Simon, D. (2017). From “living lab” to strategic action field: Bringing Together energy, mobility, and information technology in Germany. Energy Research&Social Science, 27, 25-35.
• Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. & DiFeliciantonio, C. (2018). Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities, 73, 44-50.
• Casciola, L. C. (2016). Increasing diverses take holderin clusion in an urban living lab: An experiment in design activism (Master’sThesis). Aalborg UniversityCopenhagen.
• Coenen, T., van der Graaf, S., & Walravens, N. (2014). Firing up th ecity – a smart city living lab methodology. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3 (4), 1-11.
• Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K. & Tryfonas, T. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information market places: a systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 668 – 677.
• Curtis, S. (2015). An investigation of living labs for sustainability reflections on the living lab methodology, Applied Research in Sustainable Consumption and Production (ARSCP) Master of Science in Environmental Management and Policy Lund, Sweden.
• Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensiveproposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11 (5), 2544-2551.
• Evans, J., Bulkeley, H., Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K. & Curtis, S. (2018). Urban living labs and the politics of sustainability. In K.Ward, A. E.G. Jonas, B. Miller, D. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on spaces of urban politics (pp. 416-425). New York:Routledge.
• Folstad, A. (2008). Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: A literature review. The Electronic Journalfor Virtual Organizationsand Networks, 10, 99-131.
• Folstad, A.& Karahasanović, A. (2015). A guideto online applications for user involvement in living lab innovation. Information Resources Management Association, Economics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (IGI Global), 3, 426-444.
• Franz, Y. (2015). Designing social living labs in urban research. Info, 17, 4, 53-66. Gasco, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 90–98.
• Graczyk, P. (2015). Embedding a living lab approach at the University of Edinburgh. Department for Social Responsibility and Sustainability, Erişim Tarihi: 20. 04. 2019, https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/ atoms/files/embedding_a_living_lab_approach_at_the_university_of_edinburgh.pdf.
• Habibipour, A. (2018). Living lab research: A state-of-the-art review and steps towards a research agenda. Erişim Tarihi 20. 04. 2019, http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1239574 &dswid=-3362.
• Herselman, M., Marais, M. & Pitse-Boshomane, M. (2010). Applying living lab methodology to enhance skills in innovation. eSkillsSummit 2010 Proceedings, 1-7.
• Hossain, M., Leminen, S. & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of CleanerProduction, 213, 976-988.
• Juujärvi, S. & Pesso, K. (2013). Actorroles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3 (11), 22-27.
• Katzy, B.R. & Bücker, C. (2015). The organization of living labs: Coordinating activities for regional innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5 (9), 23-28.
• Kviselius, N. Z., Ozan, H., Edenius, M. & Andersson, P. ( ? ): The evolution of living labs – Propositions for Improved Design and Further Research. 842-856, Erişim Tarihi: 22. 04. 2019, https://www. researchgate.net/publication/228653862_The_Evolution_of_Living_Labs-Propositions_for_ Improved_Design_and_Further_Research.
• Leminen, S. & Westerlund, M. (2015). Incremental and radical service innovation in living labs. In MehdiKhosrow-Pour (ChiefEds.), Economics: Concepts, methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 445-459), United States:IGI Global.
• Leminen, S. (2015). Living labs as ope nınnovation networks: Networks, roles and innovation outcomes (Doctoral Dissertations). Aalto University, School of Science Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Erişim Tarihi 16. 04. 2019, https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/17899.
• Leminen, S., Nyström, A.-G., Westerlund, M. & Kortelainen, M. J. (2016). The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31 (6), 743-757. Lin, W. Y., Lin, C. T., Wang, Y. H. & Chen, R. T. (2012). The transformation of users in living lab construction: The case of eco-city living lab. International Journal of Automationand Smart Technology (AUSMT), 2 (3), 231-240.
• Marvin, S., Bulkeley, H., Mai, L., McCormick, K. & Palgan, Y. V. (Eds.) (2018). Urban living labs: Experimenting with city futures (pp. 1-17), New York:Routledge.
• Menny, M. (2016). Users as co-creators? an analysis of user ınvolvement in urban living labs. Thesis for the Fulfilment of the Master of Science in Environmental Management and Policy Lund, Sweden, Erişim Tarihi 10. 04. 2019, https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8893215.
• Menny, M., Palgan, Y. V. & McCormick, Kes (2018). Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creat, GAIA 27/S1, 68–77.
• McLoughlin, S., Maccani, G., Prendergast, D. & Donnellan, B. (2018). Living labs: A bibliometric analysis. Hawaii International Conference on SystemSciences (HICSS), Hawaii.
• Mengual, M. P., Jonas, J. M., Schmitt-Rüth, S. & Danzinger, F. (2018). Tools for collaborating and interacting in living labs – An exploratory case study on JOSEPHS. ServDes2018, Erişim Tarihi: 14. 04. 2019, http://www.servdes.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/25.pdf.
• Nesti, G. (2017). Co-production for Innovation: The Urban living lab experience, policy and society. Policy and Society, 37 (3), 1-16.
• Öztürk, A. İ. (2019). Başlangıçtan Bugüne İstanbul’un Belediyeleri. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık. Paskaleva, K. A. (2011). Thesmartcity: A nex us for open innovation?. Intelligent Buildings International, 3 (3), 153-171.
• Puerari, E., de Koning, J. I. J. C., vonWirth, T., Karré, P. M., Mulder, I. J. & Loorbach, D. A. (2018). Cocreation dynamics in urban livinglabs. Sustainability, 10, 1-18.
• Rodrigues, M.& Franco, M. (2018). Importance of livinglabs in urban entrepreneurship: A Portuguesecasestudy. Journal of CleanerProduction, 180, 780-789.
• Sadioğlu, U. & Erdinçler, R. E. (2018). Akıllı kentler ve Türk kentleri için politika önerileri. İçinde A. Mengi ve D. İşçioğlu (Ed.), Küreselleşme sürecinde yerel hizmet yerel siyaset (s.81-101), Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
• Schuurman, D., De Marez, L. & Ballon, P. (2013). Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3 (11), 28-36.
• Schuurman, D., De Marez, L. & Ballon, P. (2016). The impact of living lab methodology on open innovation contributions ando utcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6 (1), 7-16.
• Scholl, C. & Kemp, R. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1 (4), 89–102.
• Sharp, D. & Salter, R. (2017). Direct impacts of an urban living lab from the participants’ perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability, 9, 1-15.
• Smas, L., Schmitt, P., Perjo, L. & Tunström, M. (2016). Positioning urban labs – a New Form of Smart Governance?. Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, 919-923, Erişim Tarihi: 01. 05. 2019.https://repository. corp.at/179/.
• Steen, K. & van Bueren, E. (2017). Urban living labs: A living lab way of working. Erişim Tarihi 20. 04. 2019, https://amsterdamsmartcity.com/projects/a-living-lab-way-of-working.
• Ståhlbröst, A., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. & Eriksson, C. I. (2015). Stakeholders in smart city living lab processes. Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico, Erişim Tarihi: 26. 04. 2019, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1006027/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
• Ståhlbröst, A. (2013). A living lab as a service: Creating value formicro-enterprisest hrough collaboration and innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3, 11, 37-42.
• Westerlund, M., Leminen, S. & Rajahonka, M. (2018). A topic modelling analysis of living labs research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8 (7), 40-51.