Discourse Particles in Sorani Kurdish

Öz

Discourse particles constitute an important part of spoken language; they have a wide range of pragmatic functions in interactional contexts. The object of the present paper is to introduce Kurdish discourse particles, clarify their functions in different discourse contexts, and briefly sketch some aspects of their grammatical properties. I will focus on Sorani Kurdish since this dialect has a rich inventory of discourse particles that have not so far been investigated. I will show that the majority of these particles convey multiple functions and display a great degree of free syntactic distribution, a noteworthy point. In addition to expounding upon their syntactic position, I will inquire into the types of sentences in which they can occur (declarative, interrogative, and imperative). Furthermore, I will argue that individual discourse particles can appear adjacent to each other to give rise to new combinations, and in some cases the order of the components participating in the combination can be reversed and still remain as acceptable forms. Finally, I will explore the interrogative contexts in which discourse particles can occur, and also distinguish between two types of particles that can affect the interrogative utterance in different ways.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sorani Kurdish
• discourse particles
• pragmatic function
• interactional context
• syntactic position
• sentence type

References

1. Barnes, B. K., 1995. Discourse Particles in French Conversations. The French Review, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 813–821. https://doi.org/1995
2. Bartkova, K., Bastien, A., & Dargnat, M., 2016. How to be a discourse particle? Paper presented at Proceedings of Speech Prosody. pp. 858–863.
3. Bayer, J., & Obenauer, H.-G., 2011. Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 449–491. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.013
4. Beata, G., 2009. Sentence-types, discourse particles and intonation in Hungarian. Paper presented at Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung. Stuttgart, Germany. 157–170.
5. Buscha, A., & Szilvia, S., 2011. B Grammatik: Übungsgrammatik Deutsch als Fremdsprache (1. ed.). Schubert.
6. Çabuk, S., 2020. Discourse particles in Kurmanjî Kurdish-Turkish contact. International Journal of Multilingualism, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1454450
7. Coniglio, M., 2009. Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 18, pp. 91–129.
8. Diewald, G., 2006. Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In: K. Fischer, ed. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Leiden: Brill.

9. Döring, S. and Repp, S., 2020. The modal particles ja and doch and their interaction with discourse structure: Corpus and experimental evidence. In: S. Featherston, R. Höring, S. von Wietersheim and S. Winkler, eds. Experiments in Focus: Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17.56.
10. Egg, M., 2012. Discourse particles at the semantics-pragmatics interface. In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss, eds. Modality and Theory of Mind elements across languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 297-334.
11. Fraser, B., 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V
12. Fraser, B., 1996. Pragmatic Markers. Pragmatics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra Grosz, P., 2016. Discourse particles. In: L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullmann and T. Ede Zimmermann, eds. The Companion to Semantics. Wiley Blackwell, pp, 1-29
13. Gyuris., B., 2009. Sentence-types, discourse particles and intonation in Hungarian. Paper presented at Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung. Stuttgart, Germany. 157–170.
14. Karaj, D. M., 2021. Indonesian discourse particles in conversations and written text. Wacana Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 319–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v22i2.909
15. Kim, M. S., Rhee, S., & Young Smith, H., 2021. The Korean discourse particle kulssey across discrete positions and contexts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 182, pp. 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.002
16. Massam, D., Starks, D., & Ikiua, O., 2006. On the Edge of Grammar: Discourse Particles in Niuean. Oceanic Linguistics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 191–205.
17. Sabir, P. H. S., & Jawad, H. F., 2019. Adversative Discourse Markers in Kurdish Literary Texts. English Language Teaching, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 154–168. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p154
18. Siebold, K., 2021. German dann _ From adverb to discourse marker. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 175, pp. 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.010
19. Stede, M., & Schmitz, B., 2000. Discourse Particles and Discourse Functions. Machine Translation, vol. 15, pp. 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011112031877
20. Thackston, W. M., 2006. Sorani Kurdish. A Reference Grammar with Selected Readings. Harvard University Press.
21. Trotzke, A., & Mayol, L., 2021. Catalan focus markers as discourse particles. Journal of Linguistics, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0022226720000481
22. Wakefield, J. C., & Lee, H. Y., 2019. The Grammaticalization of Indirect Reports: The Cantones Discourse Particle wo5. In: A. Capone, M. Garcia-Carpintero, and A. Falzone, eds. Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages. Berlin: Springer, pp. 333-344
23. Yeganeh, M. T., & Gheitasi, M., 2014. Markers and their functions: A case study of three discourse markers in Ilami Kurdish. Global Journal of Sociology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–21.
24. Zimmermann, M., 2011. Discourse particles. In: P. Portner, C. Maienborn and K. von Heusinger, eds. Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 2012-2038