Comparative Descriptive Economic Analysis of Greenhouse Vegetable Production, AI Adoption, and Food Safety Across Selected Countries and Regions

Year 2026, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 103 - 130, 21.03.2026

Gjovalin Gjeloshı Eriona Deda , Ardit Bobı Amidin Shala

https://doi.org/10.21600/ijoks.1897207

https://izlik.org/JA48XY78NW

Abstract

This study presents a comparative descriptive analysis of greenhouse vegetable production across seven countries and regions: Albania, Turkey (Antalya), Greece (Crete/Central Macedonia), Italy (Sicily/Puglia), Egypt, Jordan, and the Kurdish Region (Iraq). Key indicators include greenhouse area (ha), vegetable production (million tons), Agri-Tech and AI adoption, and food safety regulation. Data were compiled from national and international sources, including INSTAT, TÜİK, Eurostat, FAO, and regional reports. Results reveal substantial disparities in scale, productivity, technological integration, and regulatory compliance. Turkey (Antalya) dominates in both greenhouse area and total production, supported by advanced Agri-Tech adoption and strong food safety regulations. Italy exhibits very advanced technological integration, achieving high production efficiency with comparatively smaller area, while Greece demonstrates effective productivity and regulatory compliance despite limited greenhouse infrastructure. Egypt achieves high total production with moderate technological adoption, highlighting efficient use of available resources. Smaller and emerging regions—Albania, Jordan, and the Kurdish Region—maintain limited scale, low-to-moderate technology adoption, and moderate or developing food safety standards, indicating high growth potential through targeted investment and modernization. Integrated analysis underscores the positive correlation between technology adoption, production efficiency, and regulatory strength, while highlighting that large-scale infrastructure alone does not guarantee optimal productivity. These findings provide insights into regional strengths, technological gaps, and regulatory challenges in greenhouse vegetable production, offering guidance for policymakers, investors, and agricultural stakeholders seeking to enhance productivity, food quality, and global market competitiveness.

Keywords

Greenhouse vegetable production , AI adoption , Agri-Tech , food safety regulation , cross-country comparison , emerging regions , Kurdish Region

Ethical Statement

This study is based solely on secondary data obtained from publicly available sources, including national statistical agencies and international organizations. No primary data were collected, and no human or animal subjects were involved; therefore, ethical approval was not required. All data were analyzed objectively and reported transparently. The authors declare no conflicts of interest and confirm that all sources have been properly cited in accordance with academic integrity standards.

Supporting Institution

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. No institutional or external financial support was provided for the preparation of this study.

Project Number

1

Thanks

Authors for contributions

References

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Deda, E., Brajshori, B., & Krasniqi, D. (2020). Economic indicators of labor market and governmental policies to be taken for their improvement: The case of Albania. Journal of Educational and Social Research, *10*(5), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0086
• Deda, E., Pacukaj, E., & Vardari, A. (2021). Improving education quality and economic growth in Albania. Journal of Educational and Social Research, *11*(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0054
• European Commission. (2021). EU food safety regulatory framework. Brussels, Belgium: Publications Office of the European Union.
• European Commission. (2023). Food safety and trade: EU standards and compliance. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://food-safety.ec.europa.eu
• Eurostat. (2021). Greenhouse infrastructure, production, and regulatory standards in Europe. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
• Eurostat. (2024). Agricultural production and greenhouse data. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
• FAO. (2021). FAOSTAT: Crop production and technology adoption. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
• FAO. (2024). Greenhouse vegetable production efficiency and resource use. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.fao.org
• Gjeloshi, G., & Deda, E. (2026). Sustainable development of the tourism sector in Albania: A priority for economic growth – A descriptive analysis of tourist flows by travel purpose. European Journal of Ecology, Biology and Agriculture, *3*(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejeba.2026.3(2).08
• INSTAT. (2021). Greenhouse area and agricultural statistics in Albania. Tirana, Albania: Albanian Institute of Statistics. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.instat.gov.al
• INSTAT. (2024). Agricultural production report 2023. Tirana, Albania: Albanian Institute of Statistics. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.instat.gov.al
• Jordan Department of Statistics. (2024). Agricultural and greenhouse production statistics. Amman, Jordan: Jordan Department of Statistics. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://dosweb.dos.gov.jo
• Kurdistan Regional Government [KRG]. (2024). Regional agriculture and greenhouse report. Erbil, Iraq: Kurdistan Regional Government. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://gov.krd
• Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2022). Application of AI and precision agriculture in greenhouse vegetable production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, *198*, 107005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107005
• OECD. (2023). Digital agriculture and productivity in controlled environments. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.oecd.org/agriculture
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
• Sejdiu, S., Rexha, B., & Deda, E. (2023). The development of the tourism sector, important for the socio-economic development of the country. Journal of Educational and Social Research, *13*(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0072
• TÜİK. (2021). Regional vegetable production and Agri-Tech adoption in Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.tuik.gov.tr
• TÜİK. (2024). Agricultural statistics and greenhouse production report 2023. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.tuik.gov.tr
• WHO. (2023). Food safety governance and standards for international trade. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.who.int
• World Bank. (2023). Agricultural structural transformation and investment opportunities. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved March 21, 2026, from https://www.worldbank.org
• Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, H. (2020). Smart greenhouse technology and AI adoption for enhanced vegetable production. Agricultural Systems, *181*, 102824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102824