EN
TR
The Impact of Sustainable Marketing Approaches on Brands
Abstract
Issues regarding the swift transformations in the environment, climate, and society have rendered the concept of sustainability, centered on human needs, one of the most significant subjects of discourse today. The rise in environmental awareness has heightened consumers' attention to problems like environmental protection and the preservation of natural resources for future generations. Brands recognizing this predicament have commenced the production of eco-friendly products and sustainable packaging, while also implementing other sustainability initiatives to mitigate their environmental consequences. This circumstance has facilitated the birth of new concepts, like sustainable marketing, sustainable consumption, and sustainable branding for both corporations and individuals. Sustainability entails the responsibility to safeguard natural resources essential for future generations while addressing the requirements of the present population. This principle advocates for corporations to function with consideration for environmental and social responsibility. Furthermore, brands often incorporate sustainability narratives into their marketing communications. These messages serve not just to inform and raise customer awareness but also to enhance brand image and foster brand loyalty. Brands' sustainability initiatives positively impact consumer segments with heightened environmental and social awareness, particularly Generation Z. Nonetheless, the literature often underscores that a deficiency in transparency within sustainability discourses may foster the perception of "greenwashing," so undermining brand reputation. Consequently, it is imperative for companies to engage in these discourses consistently and transparently. This research analyzes the sustainability strategies of brands and provides specific examples of sustainability initiatives. The research findings indicate that businesses have initiated creative projects, particularly in environmental sustainability, although require additional advancement in social and economic sustainability.
Keywords
References
- [1] Bansal P., Roth K. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal. 2000; 43(4): 717.
- [2] Carroll A.B., Shabana K.M. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010; 12(1): 85.
- [3] Brundtland G.H., Ed. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
- [4] Elkington J. Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line Of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone; 1999.
- [5] Hart S.L. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy Of Management Review. 1995; 20(4): 986.
- [6] Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review. 2011; 89(1–2): 62.
- [7] Searcy, Cory. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda." Journal of Business Ethics 107, no. 3 (2012): 239.
- [8] Gladwin, Thomas N., James J. Kennelly, and Tara S. Krause. "Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research." Academy of Management Review 20, no. 4 (1995): 874.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Energy Systems Engineering (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 31, 2025
Submission Date
August 5, 2025
Acceptance Date
October 3, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Number: Special Issue