Research Article

Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles

Volume: 26 Number: 4 December 1, 2023
EN

Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles

Abstract

The energy and exergy evaluation of simple gas turbine (SGT), gas turbine with air bottoming cycle (GT-ABC), and partial oxidation gas turbine (POGT) are studied. The governing equations for each cycle are solved using energy equation Solver (EES) software. The characteristics performance for selected cycles are discussed and verified with that obtained for available practical cycles (SGT, GT-ABC, POGT). The present results show a good agreement with the practical one. The effects of significant operational parameters, turbine inlet temperature (TIT), compression ratio (CR), and compressor inlet temperature (CIT), on the specific fuel consumption, energy and exergy efficiencies are discussed. According to the findings, a reduction in CIT and a rise in TIT and CR led to enhance energy and exergy efficiency for each configuration with different ranges. Results revealed that the GT-ABC and POGT cycles are more efficient than those of SGT at the same operational parameters. The energy and exergy efficiencies are 38.4%, 36.2% for SGT, 40%, 37.8 % for GT-ABC, and 41.6%, 39.3% for POGT. The POGT cycle has a better energy and exergy performance at a lower pressure ratio than the SGT and GT-ABC.

Keywords

References

  1. J. A. M. da Silva, S. Ávila Filho, and M. Carvalho, “Assessment of energy and exergy efficiencies in steam generators,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 3217–3226, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0704-6.
  2. M. N. Ibrahim, T. K., Mohammed, M. K., Awad, O. I., Abdalla, A. N., Basrawi, F., Mohammed, “A comprehensive review on the exergy analysis of combined cycle power plants,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 90, no. April, pp. 835–850, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.072.
  3. A. G. Memon, R. A. Memon, K. Harijan, and M. A. Uqaili, “Thermo-environmental analysis of an open cycle gas turbine power plant with regression modeling and optimization,” Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 81–88, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2014.03.023.
  4. Ş. Balku, “Analysis of combined cycle efficiency by simulation and optimization,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 148, pp. 174–183, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.032.
  5. O. J. Khaleel, F. Basim Ismail, T. Khalil Ibrahim, and S. H. bin Abu Hassan, “Energy and exergy analysis of the steam power plants: A comprehensive review on the Classification, Development, Improvements, and configurations,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 101640, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.11.009.
  6. D. M. Mitrović, B. V. Stojanović, J. N. Janevski, M. G. Ignjatović, and G. D. Vučković, “Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam boiler,” Thermal Science, vol. 22, pp. S1601–S1612, 2018, doi: 10.2298/TSCI18S5601M.
  7. G. R. Ahmadi and D. Toghraie, “Energy and exergy analysis of Montazeri Steam Power Plant in Iran,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 56, pp. 454–463, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.074.
  8. O. K. Singh, “Assessment of thermodynamic irreversibility in different zones of a heavy fuel oil fired high pressure boiler,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 829–840, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10973-015-4959-4.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics, Energy Systems Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

September 26, 2023

Publication Date

December 1, 2023

Submission Date

March 21, 2023

Acceptance Date

September 11, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 26 Number: 4

APA
Elwardany, M., Nassib, A. E.- moneim M., & Mohamed, H. A. (2023). Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 26(4), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1268823
AMA
1.Elwardany M, Nassib AE moneim M, Mohamed HA. Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2023;26(4):57-67. doi:10.5541/ijot.1268823
Chicago
Elwardany, Mohamed, Abd El-moneim M. Nassib, and Hany A. Mohamed. 2023. “Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 26 (4): 57-67. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1268823.
EndNote
Elwardany M, Nassib AE- moneim M, Mohamed HA (December 1, 2023) Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles. International Journal of Thermodynamics 26 4 57–67.
IEEE
[1]M. Elwardany, A. E.- moneim M. Nassib, and H. A. Mohamed, “Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles”, International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 57–67, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.5541/ijot.1268823.
ISNAD
Elwardany, Mohamed - Nassib, Abd El-moneim M. - Mohamed, Hany A. “Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 26/4 (December 1, 2023): 57-67. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1268823.
JAMA
1.Elwardany M, Nassib AE- moneim M, Mohamed HA. Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2023;26:57–67.
MLA
Elwardany, Mohamed, et al. “Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles”. International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 26, no. 4, Dec. 2023, pp. 57-67, doi:10.5541/ijot.1268823.
Vancouver
1.Mohamed Elwardany, Abd El-moneim M. Nassib, Hany A. Mohamed. Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2023 Dec. 1;26(4):57-6. doi:10.5541/ijot.1268823

Cited By