BibTex RIS Cite

Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants

Year 2016, , 53 - 60, 10.03.2016
https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088

Abstract

The geothermal energy is renewable energy, which is viewed as a promising alternative to fossil energy. This paper conducts a comparative study among double-flash, flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. The mathematical models of three different geothermal power plants are established. And parametric analyses are performed to examine the effect of some key parameters on system performance. The performance of each cycle has been discussed in terms of the net power output, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency. Moreover, genetic algorithm (GA) is used to conduct optimization to obtain the best performance of three different geothermal power plants. Flash-ORC geothermal power plant yields the highest exergy efficiency of 46.121%. Exergy efficiency of Flash-Kalina geothermal power plant is 36.747%, but the inlet pressure of ammonia-water turbine is much higher than that of organic turbine and steam turbine. Double-flash has the lowest exergy efficiency of 31.922%.

Year 2016, , 53 - 60, 10.03.2016
https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Regular Original Research Article
Authors

Liyan Cao This is me

Pan Zhao This is me

Jiangfeng Wang

Yiping Dai This is me

Publication Date March 10, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016

Cite

APA Cao, L., Zhao, P., Wang, J., Dai, Y. (2016). Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 19(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088
AMA Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. March 2016;19(1):53-60. doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088
Chicago Cao, Liyan, Pan Zhao, Jiangfeng Wang, and Yiping Dai. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19, no. 1 (March 2016): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
EndNote Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y (March 1, 2016) Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19 1 53–60.
IEEE L. Cao, P. Zhao, J. Wang, and Y. Dai, “Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants”, International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2016, doi: 10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
ISNAD Cao, Liyan et al. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19/1 (March 2016), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
JAMA Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016;19:53–60.
MLA Cao, Liyan et al. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, 2016, pp. 53-60, doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
Vancouver Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016;19(1):53-60.