BibTex RIS Cite

On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison among Three Global Losses Formulations

Year 2002, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 177 - 188, 01.12.2002
https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP

Abstract

The objectives of energy systems diagnosis are: i) identifying components responsible for highest losses increments in comparison with design conditions, ii) quantifying energy-efficiency recovery when design conditions are restored in a particular system component. In this paper the energy diagnosis of an existing steam power plant is faced on the basis of three different formulae expressing global losses.

A simulation model of a real 320 MW steam power plant has been implemented with a commercial modular energy systems simulation software (Aspen+). The functional decay of different components of the plant has been simulated using the model. The results show that the components actually responsible for the additional power losses can be identified and the effect of restoring design conditions can be quantified in most cases with sufficient approximation by using the General Formula for the Efficiency or the Lost work Impact Formula (developed in the ambit of thermoeconomics).

Year 2002, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 177 - 188, 01.12.2002
https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Authors

Mauro Reini This is me

Rodolfo Taccani

Publication Date December 1, 2002
IZ https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP
Published in Issue Year 2002 Volume: 5 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Reini, M., & Taccani, R. (2002). On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison among Three Global Losses Formulations. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 5(4), 177-188. https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP
AMA 1.Reini M, Taccani R. On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison among Three Global Losses Formulations. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2002;5(4):177-188. https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP
Chicago Reini, Mauro, and Rodolfo Taccani. 2002. “On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison Among Three Global Losses Formulations”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 5 (4): 177-88. https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP.
EndNote Reini M, Taccani R (December 1, 2002) On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison among Three Global Losses Formulations. International Journal of Thermodynamics 5 4 177–188.
IEEE [1]M. Reini and R. Taccani, “On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison among Three Global Losses Formulations”, International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 177–188, Dec. 2002, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP
ISNAD Reini, Mauro - Taccani, Rodolfo. “On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison Among Three Global Losses Formulations”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 5/4 (December 1, 2002): 177-188. https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP.
JAMA 1.Reini M, Taccani R. On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison among Three Global Losses Formulations. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2002;5:177–188.
MLA Reini, Mauro, and Rodolfo Taccani. “On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison Among Three Global Losses Formulations”. International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 5, no. 4, Dec. 2002, pp. 177-88, https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP.
Vancouver 1.Reini M, Taccani R. On Energy Diagnosis of Steam Power Plants: A Comparison among Three Global Losses Formulations. International Journal of Thermodynamics [Internet]. 2002 Dec. 1;5(4):177-88. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA52SC22AP