BibTex RIS Cite

Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions

Year 2015, , 171 - 178, 06.08.2015
https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000071903

Abstract

Sugarcane-based ethanol in Colombia has a prospective opportunity to explore the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass taking into account that a large amount of generated residues (between 50 and 100 t/ha) are left on the field after green harvesting. The use of sugarcane green harvesting residues for ethanol production could be considered as a feasible solution but it is facing high supply costs. A bottom-up engineering cost model was used to estimate the green harvesting residues supply cost for three collection strategies. The model took into account the investment and operation costs of the residues collection, processing, delivery, and machineries including depreciations, repair and maintenance, and labor cost. Overall energy consumptions and life-cycle GHG emissions of the three strategies were analyzed. The integral harvesting showed the best performance in costs (6.01 USD/dry-t), energy consumptions (125.32 MJ/dry-t), and GHG emissions (7.74 kg CO2-eq/dry-t), followed by the baled and chopped residues.

References

  • A. Ajanovic, Biofuels versus food production: Does biofuels production increase food prices?, Energy 36, 2070-2076, 2011. y A. Bonomi, Improving second generation ethanol production through optimization of first generation production process from sugarcane, Energy. 43, 246-252, 2012.
  • IEA Bioenergy, Gaps in the research of 2nd generation transportation biofuels. Energy Systems Analysis, 17 December http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publica tion/2nd_Biofuel_Gen.pdf. [Online]. Available: crops: A case study of US corn and Brazilian sugarcane, Energy policy 38, 547-561, 2010.
  • J. Allen, M. Browne, A. Hunter, J. Boyd y H. Palmer, Logistics management and costs of biomass fuel supply, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 28, 463-477, 1998.
  • NREL, Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover, NREL, Golden Colorado, 2002.
  • IEA, World Energy outlook 2010, OECD/International Energy Agency, Paris, 2010.
  • L. G. Amş, Optimization model for allocating transport and harvesting equipment within a sugarcane supply system (In Spanish), VIII Congreso de la Asociación Colombiana de Técnicos de la Caña de Azşcar, 2009.
  • Centro Nacional de Productividad, The Cauca Valley sugar conglomerate, Colombia (In Spanish), Natural resources clusters, Santiago de Chile, United Nations - ISSN: 1680-8754, 47, 2002.
  • S. Gaucher, P.-Y. Gal y G. Soler, Modelling supply chain management in the sugar industry, Proc S Afr Sug Technol Assis. 77, 542 - 554, 2003.
  • J. S. Torres y F. Villegas, Management and use of crop residues in Green harvesting (In Spanish), In CENICAÑA: Crop management for green cane harvesting, Cali, 82 – 165, 2006.
  • 178 / Vol. 18 (No. 3)
  • Int. Centre for Applied Thermodynamics (ICAT)
Year 2015, , 171 - 178, 06.08.2015
https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000071903

Abstract

References

  • A. Ajanovic, Biofuels versus food production: Does biofuels production increase food prices?, Energy 36, 2070-2076, 2011. y A. Bonomi, Improving second generation ethanol production through optimization of first generation production process from sugarcane, Energy. 43, 246-252, 2012.
  • IEA Bioenergy, Gaps in the research of 2nd generation transportation biofuels. Energy Systems Analysis, 17 December http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publica tion/2nd_Biofuel_Gen.pdf. [Online]. Available: crops: A case study of US corn and Brazilian sugarcane, Energy policy 38, 547-561, 2010.
  • J. Allen, M. Browne, A. Hunter, J. Boyd y H. Palmer, Logistics management and costs of biomass fuel supply, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 28, 463-477, 1998.
  • NREL, Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover, NREL, Golden Colorado, 2002.
  • IEA, World Energy outlook 2010, OECD/International Energy Agency, Paris, 2010.
  • L. G. Amş, Optimization model for allocating transport and harvesting equipment within a sugarcane supply system (In Spanish), VIII Congreso de la Asociación Colombiana de Técnicos de la Caña de Azşcar, 2009.
  • Centro Nacional de Productividad, The Cauca Valley sugar conglomerate, Colombia (In Spanish), Natural resources clusters, Santiago de Chile, United Nations - ISSN: 1680-8754, 47, 2002.
  • S. Gaucher, P.-Y. Gal y G. Soler, Modelling supply chain management in the sugar industry, Proc S Afr Sug Technol Assis. 77, 542 - 554, 2003.
  • J. S. Torres y F. Villegas, Management and use of crop residues in Green harvesting (In Spanish), In CENICAÑA: Crop management for green cane harvesting, Cali, 82 – 165, 2006.
  • 178 / Vol. 18 (No. 3)
  • Int. Centre for Applied Thermodynamics (ICAT)
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Invited ECOS Papers
Authors

Jairo Lozano Moreno

Mitra Delivand This is me

Francois Marechal

Publication Date August 6, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015

Cite

APA Lozano Moreno, J., Delivand, M., & Marechal, F. (2015). Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 18(3), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000071903
AMA Lozano Moreno J, Delivand M, Marechal F. Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions. International Journal of Thermodynamics. August 2015;18(3):171-178. doi:10.5541/ijot.5000071903
Chicago Lozano Moreno, Jairo, Mitra Delivand, and Francois Marechal. “Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 18, no. 3 (August 2015): 171-78. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000071903.
EndNote Lozano Moreno J, Delivand M, Marechal F (August 1, 2015) Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions. International Journal of Thermodynamics 18 3 171–178.
IEEE J. Lozano Moreno, M. Delivand, and F. Marechal, “Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions”, International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 171–178, 2015, doi: 10.5541/ijot.5000071903.
ISNAD Lozano Moreno, Jairo et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 18/3 (August 2015), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000071903.
JAMA Lozano Moreno J, Delivand M, Marechal F. Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2015;18:171–178.
MLA Lozano Moreno, Jairo et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions”. International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 18, no. 3, 2015, pp. 171-8, doi:10.5541/ijot.5000071903.
Vancouver Lozano Moreno J, Delivand M, Marechal F. Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2015;18(3):171-8.