Highly Efficient Energy Integration: Thermodynamic Analysis of Heat Recovered from SOFC Through S-CO2 And Kalina Cycles

Year 2024, Volume: 27 Issue: 4, 43 - 55, 01.12.2024

Ahmet Elbir

https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1486368

Abstract

This study focuses on the implementation of a highly efficient energy integration using solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology. A detailed thermodynamic analysis of the integration of heat energy obtained from SOFC into the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (S-CO2) cycle and the Kalina cycle aims to assess its effectiveness, sustainability, and economic performance in energy systems. The study presents a thermodynamic analysis encompassing the integration of SOFC technology into an energy system, as well as the integration of the heat energy obtained into the S-CO2 cycle, Kalina cycle, and hot water production. The high energy efficiencies, low carbon emissions, and economic advantages individually achieved by SOFC, S-CO2 cycle, and Kalina cycle are significantly enhanced when integrated into a cohesive system. The integrated system analysis results show an energy efficiency of 89.1%, an exergy efficiency of 64.6%, and an exergetic sustainability index of 0.83, demonstrating that this integration provides an energy solution with high efficiency, sustainability, and a low carbon footprint. Thermodynamic analyses were performed using the EES (Engineering Equation Solver) software. The main contribution of this study is the introduction of innovative approaches to energy efficiency and exergy analysis. The system achieves high energy efficiency through the integration of SOFC and the Kalina cycle. Particularly, optimizing the thermal management of the SOFC and utilizing the ammonia-water mixture more efficiently in the Kalina cycle brings significant improvements in the system's energy and exergy efficiency. These analyses demonstrate higher efficiency and sustainability compared to existing systems, emphasizing the originality of this approach.

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cell, Supercritical CO2, Kalina cycle, Energy analysis, Exergy analysis

References

• Y. Liu, J. Han, and H. You, “Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a CCHP system based on SOFC/GT and transcritical CO2 power/refrigeration cycles,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 230, p. 120686, 2023.
• D. Wang, H. A. Dhahad, M. A. Ali, S. F. Almojil, A. I. Almohana, A. F. Alali, and K. T. Almoalimi, “Environmental/Economic assessment and multi-aspect optimization of a poly-generation system based on waste heat recovery of PEM fuel cells,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 223, p. 119946, 2023.
• Y. Ji-chao and B. Sobhani, “Integration of biomass gasification with a supercritical CO2 and Kalina cycles in a combined heating and power system: A thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis,” Energy, vol. 222, p. 119980, 2021.
• Z. Wang, Y. Ma, M. Cao, Y. Jiang, Y. Ji, and F. Han, “Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, environmental (4E) evaluation and multi-objective optimization of a novel SOFC-ICE-SCO2-HRSG hybrid system for power and heat generation,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 291, p. 117332, 2023.
• Y. Zhou, X. Han, D. Wang, Y. Sun, and X. Li, “Optimization and performance analysis of a near-zero emission SOFC hybrid system based on a supercritical CO2 cycle using solar energy,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 280, p. 116818, 2023.
• W. Liang, Z. Yu, F. Bian, H. Wu, K. Zhang, S. Ji, and B. Cui, "Techno-economic-environmental analysis and optimization of biomass-based SOFC poly-generation system," Energy, vol. 285, Art. no. 129410, Jan. 2023.
• H. R. Abbasi, H. Pourrahmani, and N. Chitgar, “Thermodynamic analysis of a tri-generation system using SOFC and HDH desalination unit,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 18, pp. 12345-12357, 2021.
• N. Chitgar, M. A. Emadi, A. Chitsaz, and M. A. Rosen, “Investigation of a novel multigeneration system driven by a SOFC for electricity and fresh water production,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 196, pp. 296–310, 2019.
• A. Kumar, A. K. Yadav, and S. Sinha, "Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of a Hybrid Power System formed from Solid Oxide Fuel Cell, Gas Turbine, and Organic Rankine Cycle," J. Energy Resour. Technol., vol. 146, pp. 1–30, 2024.
• A. Arsalis and G. E. Georghiou, “A decentralized, hybrid photovoltaic-solid oxide fuel cell system for application to a commercial building,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 3512, 2018.
• P. Ran, X. Zhou, Y. Wang, Q. Fan, D. Xin, and Z. Li, “Thermodynamic and exergetic analysis of a novel multi-generation system based on SOFC, micro-gas turbine, S-CO2 and lithium bromide absorption refrigerator,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 219, p. 119585, 2023.
• J. Pirkandi, M. Ghassemi, M. H. Hamedi, and R. Mohammadi, “Electrochemical and thermodynamic modeling of a CHP system using tubular solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC-CHP),” J. Cleaner Prod., vol. 29, pp. 151–162, 2012.
• Y. Cao, S. Alsharif, E. A. Attia, M. A. Shamseldin, and B. F. Ibrahim, “A conceptual process design towards CO2 emission reduction by integration of solar-based hydrogen production and injection into biomass-derived solid oxide fuel cell,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 164, pp. 164–176, 2022.
• U. Gunes, A. S. Karakurt, and B. Sahin, "The effect of size on entropy generation for waste heat recovery boiler," in Proc. 32nd Int. Conf. Eff., Cost, Optim., Simul. Environ. Impact Energy Syst., 2019, pp. 809–818.
• E. Yücel, B. Doğanay, F. Gökalp, N. Baycık, and Y. Durmuşoğlu, “Kalina çevriminin bir tanker gemisine entegrasyonu ve geminin enerji verimliliğine etkisinin analizi,” Seatific, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–36, Dec. 2021.
• T. Koroglu and O. S. Sogut, “Advanced exergoeconomic analysis of organic rankine cycle waste heat recovery system of a marine power plant,” Int. J. Thermodyn., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 140–151, 2017.
• Y. Ust, A. S. Karakurt, and U. Gunes, “Performance analysis of multipurpose refrigeration system (MRS) on fishing vessel,” Pol. Maritime Res., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 48–56, 2016.
• J. Sieres and J. A. Martínez-Suárez, "Simulation of an integrated hydrogen fuel cell with LIBR-water absorption system for combined production of electricity, cooling and hot water," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics, and Thermodynamics (HEFAT), Pointe Aux Piments, Mauritius, Jul. 2012, pp. 1163–1170.
• R. A. Gaggioli and W. R. Dunbar, “Emf, maximum power and efficiency of fuel cells,” Energy Resour. Technol., vol. 115, pp. 100–104, 1993.
• Y. A. Cengel and M. A. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 8th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
• I. Dincer and M. A. Rosen, Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2012.
• A. Bejan, G. Tsatsaronis, and M. Moran, Thermal Design and Optimization. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
• M. Sharifishourabi, "Energetic and Exergetic Analysis of a Solar Organic Rankine Cycle with Triple Effect Absorption System," M.S. thesis, Eastern Mediterranean Univ. (EMU), Famagusta, Cyprus, 2016.
• J. Jeswiet and S. Kara, “Carbon emissions and CES™ in manufacturing,” CIRP Annals, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 2008.
• International Energy Agency (IEA), “Global Energy & CO2 Data,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/countries. [Accessed: Aug. 2023].
• IRENA, “REmap 2030 commodity prices,” [Online]. Available: https://www.irena.org/-media/Files/IRENA/REmap/Methodology/IRENA_REmap_2030_commodity_prices.xlsx?la=en&hash=505B546E4EE80A557363781E83EA1AE83D9FB256. [Accessed: Aug. 2023].
• A. Hasanzadeh, A. Chitsaz, P. Mojaver, and A. Ghasemi, “Stand-alone gas turbine and hybrid MCFC and SOFC-gas turbine systems: Comparative life cycle cost, environmental, and energy assessments,” Energy Rep., vol. 7, pp. 4659–4680, 2021.
• H. You, Y. Xiao, J. Han, A. Lysyakov, and D. Chen, “Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses and optimization of a solid oxide fuel cell-based trigeneration system,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 15950–15965, 2023.
• E. Gholamian and V. Zare, “A comparative thermodynamic investigation with environmental analysis of SOFC waste heat to power conversion employing Kalina and Organic Rankine Cycles,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 117, pp. 150–161, 2016.
• S. A. Klein, Engineering Equation Solver (EES), F-Chart Software, Version 10.835-3D, 2020.