Battalgazi ve Yeşilyurt (Malatya) İlçelerinde Buckfast Irkı Arıların Ürün Oluşturmada Polen Tercihlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Bu çalışma 2024 yılında Yeşilyurt ve Battalgazi ilçelerinde kurulan arılıklarda ürettiğimiz bal, propolis, polen ve arı ekmeği ürünlerinde botanik orijin belir-lemesi için gerçekleştirilmiş palinolojik bir araştırmadır. Buna göre her iki ilçe arasında karşılaştırma yapılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler değerlendirildinde sonuçlar şu şekildedir; arı ürünlerinde toplam 24 familyaya ait 36 takson belirlenmiş bun-lardan 28 takson balda, 30 takson propoliste, 30 takson polende, 26 takson da arı ekmeğinde tanımlanmıştır. Başlıca dominant taksonlar balda Astragalus, Cistus, Artemisia, Echium, Onobrychis, Verbascum; propoliste Poaceae, Astragalus, Carduus, Verbascum, Onobrychis, Salix; arı poleninde Echium, Artemisia, Apiaceae; arı ekmeğinde Echium, Artemisia, Poaceae, Onobrychis olarak belir-lenmiştir. Sonuçlar doğrultusunda Battalgazi ilçesine ait arı ürünleri Yeşilyurt ilçesine göre bitkisel çeşitlilik açısından daha zengindir.

Keywords

• Polen
• Malatya
• bal
• propolis
• arı ekmeği

Comparison of Pollen Preferences of Buckfast Race Bees in Formation Bee Products in Battalgazi and Yeşilyurt (Malatya) District

Abstract

This study was conducted in Malatya, one of the provinces most affected by the earthquake centered in Kahramanmaraş on February 6, 2023, to determine the effects of post-earthquake pollution on the plant sources selected by honey bees in composing product and to determine recommendations that can be given to beekeepers in this regard. For this reason, in 2024, a palynological study was conducted to determine the botanical origin of honey, propolis, pollen and bee bread produced in apiaries established in Yeşilyurt, the district most affected by both the earthquake and the construction works carried out afterwards, and in Battalgazi, a relatively more protected region. Accordingly, a comparison was made between the two districts. According to the obtained data, the results are as follows; a total of 36 taxa belonging to 24 families were determined in bee products, 28 taxa of the total were identified in honey, 30 taxa in propolis, 30 taxa in pollen, and 26 taxa in bee bread. The main dominant taxa were determined as Astragalus, Cistus, Artemisia, Echium, Onobrychis, Verbascum in honey; Poaceae, Astragalus, Carduus, Verbascum, Onobrychis, Salix in propolis; Echium, Artemisia, Apiaceae in bee pollen; Echium, Artemisia, Poaceae, Onobrychis in bee bread. When the taxon diversity obtained in the results is examined, it is seen that after the earthquake, the number of plant taxa preferred by honey bees while producing bee products decreased, and it was seen that Yeşilyurt district was more affected by the pollution formed after the earthquake in terms of bee product quality compared to Battalgazi district.

Keywords

• Pollen
• Malatya
• honey
• propolis

References

1. [1] Türk Gıda Kodeksi Bal Tebliği, 2020.
2. [2] Türk Gıda Kodeksi Arı Ürünleri Tebliği (Tebliğ No: 2024/6).
3. [3] M.J. Aira, H. Horn, M.C. Seijo,“Palynological analysis of honeys from Portugal”. Journal of Apicultura Research, v. 37, pp. 247–254, 1998, doi: 10.1080/00218839.1998.11100979
4. [4] A. Bilisik, I.Cakmak, G.Saatcioglu, A. Bicakci, H. Malyer, 2008. “Spectrum of Pollen Collected by Honeybees in Bursa Lowland Area in High Season”, Uludağ Bee Journal, v. 8, c.4, pp.143-148, 2008.
5. [5] M. Çenet, A. Bozdogan, G. Sezer, L. Acar, Z. Ulukanli, “Antimicrobial activities, pollen diversity and physicochemical properties of natural honey from Southeastern Anatolia of Turkey”, Advancements in Life Sciences, v.4., pp. 47-54. 2017.
6. [6] S.M. Mohammad, N. Mahmud-Ab- Rashid, N. Zawawi, 2020. “Botanical Origin and Nutritional Values of Bee Bread of Stingless Bee (Heterotrigona itama) from Malaysia”. Journal of Food Quality, 12 p. 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/2845757
7. [7] R.D. Vargas- Sánchez, M.C. Peñalba-Garmendia, J.J. Sánchez-Escalante, G.R.Torrescano-Urrutia, A. Sánchez-Escalante, “Pollen profile of propolis produced on the eastern edge of the Sonoran Desert in central Sonora, Mexico”, Acta Botanica Mexica, v. 114, pp. 69-86, 2016. doi: 10.21829/abm114.2016.1103
8. [8] I. Ramos ve C. Ferreras, “Pollen and sensorial characterization of different honeys from El Hierro (Canary Islands)”. Grana, v. 45, pp. 146-159. 2006. doi: 10.1080/00173130600578658.

9. [9] O. Solak Amet, İ. Çakmak, A. Tosunoğlu, “Pollen Preferences of Honey Bees Apis mellifera L on Marmara Island” Journal of Apitherapy and Nature, v. 6, c. 2, pp. 41–56, Jan. 2023, 10.35206/jan.1377566
10. [10] S. Hoñko ve Z. Jasiñski, “Comparison of different honeybee races under the conditions of south-western Finland”, Journal of Apicultural Science, v.46 c.2, pp.97-106, 2002. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/11.4.848
11. [11] R. Büchler, “Erfahrungen mit der Buckfastbiene II”, Deutsches Bienen-Journal, v.6, c.5, pp. 19-22, 1998.
12. [12] K. Olszewski, “ Assessment of Production Traits in the Buckfast Bee”, Journal of Apicultural Science, v. 53 c.2, pp. 79-90, 2009.
13. [13] Ş. Karakuş, “Malatya İli Florası” PhD. dissertation. Inonu Üniv. Malatya, Türkiye, 2016.
14. [14] B. Yıldız, Z. Bahçecioğlu, T. Arabacı, “Floristic Characteristics of Beydağı (Malatya)”, Turkish Journal of Botany, v.28, c. 4, pp. 391-419, 2004.
15. [15] B. Mutlu, Ş. Karakuş, “Floristic List of Inonu University Malatya Main Campus Area”, Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, v. 43, c.2, pp. 73-89, 2015.
16. [16] J. Louveaux, A. Maurizio, G. Vorwohl, “Methods of Melissopalynology”, Bee World, v.59, pp. 139-154, 1978.
17. [17] O.M. Barth,“Pollen analysis of Brazilian propolis”, Grana, v. 37, c. 2, pp. 97-101,1998, doi: 10.1080/00173139809362650.
18. [18] O.M. Barth, C.F. Pinto Da Luz, “Melissopalynological data obtained from a mangrove area near to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil”, Journal of Apicultural Research, v. 37, c.3, pp. 155-163, 1998, doi: 10.1080/00218839.1998.11100967
19. [19] G. Yıl, S. Karlidag, A. Akyol, A. Koseman, A. B. Uyumlu, M. Yilmaztekin, S. Erdogan, I. Seker, “Pollen And Fungal Spore Composition Varriations Of Honeys According to Different Feeding Methods”, Pakistan Journal of Botany, v. 55 c.1, pp. 237-247, 2023, doi: /10.30848/PJB2023-1(17).
20. [20] G. Yıl ve S. Karlıdağ, “Palynological Analyses of Malatya Propolis Samples”, Manas Journal of Agriculture Veterinary and Life Sciences, v. 13 c. 1, pp. 40-49, 2023. doi: 10.53518/mjavl.1262653.
21. [21] G.Yıl, “Pollen Sources Plants For Honey Bees In Hekimhan & Yesilyurt Districts Of Malatya”, 2. International Scientific and Inovation Congress, 2021, Ankara, Türkiye 22-23/05/2021. P: 80.ISBN: 978-625-7636-87-2
22. [22] G. Yıl, S. Karlıdağ, “Palynological Varities Among Bee Breads Produced By Four Different Bee Races”, Third International Congress on Bee Sciences, Online, 24-26/Nisan/2024. P:72, ISBN: 978-605-71368-8-6
23. [23] K. Köppler, G. Vorwohl, N. Koeniger, “Comparison of pollen spectra collected by four different subspecies of the honey bee Apis mellifera”. Apidologie, v. 38, c.4, pp. 341-353, 2007. doi: 10.1051/apido:2007020
24. [24] R. Villanueva-Gutierrez, & J.J. Quezada-Euán, T. Eltz, “Pollen diets of two sibling orchid bee species, Euglossa, in Yucatán, southern Mexico”, Apidologie. v. 44. pp. 440-446, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0194-9.
25. [25] K. Sorkun ve Ö. İnceoğlu, “İç Anadolu Bölgesi ballarında polen analizi”, Doğa Bilim Dergisi A2, v. 8, c.2, pp. 222-228, 1984.
26. [26] S. Silici ve M. Gökceoglu, “Pollen analysis of honeys from Mediterranean region of Anatolia”, Grana, v. 46, c.1, pp. 57–64, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1080/00173130601138783.
27. [27] H. Tosunoglu, , A. Tosunoğlu, , N. Ergün, A. Biçakçi, “Botanical characterisation of natural honey samples from a high altitudinal region, Gümüşhane, East-Türkiye”, Grana, v.62, c.1, pp. 59-69, 2023, doi:10.1080/00173134.2022.2138532.
28. [28] S. Bayram, F.N. Kaci, N.E. Bayram, A. Gormez, “A mini report on palynological and antibacterial tests of four propolis samples from different regional origins”, Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, v. 16 c.2, pp. 143-148. 2020, doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.687098
29. [29] S. Kolaylı, C. Birinci, , Y. Kara, A. Ozkok, A.E. Tanuğur Samancı, H. Sahin, O. Yildiz, “A melissopalynological and chemical characterization of Anatolian propolis and an assessment of its antioxidant potential” . European Food Research and Technology, v. 249, pp. 1213–1233, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00217-023-04208-x.
30. [30] N. Mayda, A. Özkök, N. E. Bayram, Y. Gercek, K. Sorkun, “Bee bread and bee pollen of different plant sources: determination of phenolic content, antioxidant activity, fatty acid and element profiles”, Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, v. 14, c.4, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11694-020-00427-y.
31. [31] S. Kolayli, G. Okumus Yukunc, Y. Kara, E. Demir Kanbur, Z. Can. A. Ozkok, A.E. Tanugur Samancı, “Bee bread from Anatolia: its chemical composition, phenolic and aromatic profiles, and antioxidant properties”, Journal of Apicultural Research, v. 14, pp, 1-15, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00218839.2024.2352319