Measuring Animal Welfare Performance in Cattle Farms with the PROMETHEE Method

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 548 - 561, 29.12.2025

Esra Yavuz

https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.1759570

Abstract

Animal welfare has become an increasingly important concept in modern livestock farms, both from an ethical and production perspective. This study aimed to evaluate animal welfare performance in cattle farms using the PROMETHEE II method, a multi-criteria decision-making method. Five key criteria were identified: animal space, nutrition, housing, health, and behavioral observations, and seven different cattle farms were analyzed based on these criteria. Criteria weights were calculated, and farms were ranked according to their net flux values. The findings revealed significant differences in animal welfare levels across farms. Furthermore, it was concluded that the PROMETHEE II method offers an effective and systematic approach for assessing the multidimensional and complex issue of animal welfare.

Keywords

Animal welfare , cattle farms , PROMETHEE II , multi-criteria decision making , agricultural management

Sığır İşletmelerinde Hayvan Refahı Performansının PROMETHEE Yöntemi ile Ölçülmesi

Abstract

Hayvan refahı, modern hayvancılık işletmelerinde hem etik hem de üretimsel açıdan giderek daha fazla önem kazanan bir kavram haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, sığır işletmelerinde hayvan refahı performansının çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden biri olan PROMETHEE II yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında hayvan başına düşe alan, beslenme, barınma, sağlık ve davranışsal gözlem gibi beş temel kriter belirlenmiş ve bu kriterler doğrultusunda yedi farklı sığır işletmesi analiz edilmiştir. Kriter ağırlıkları hesaplanmış ve işletmeler net akı değerlerine göre sıralanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, hayvan refahı düzeyinin işletmeden işletmeye anlamlı farklılıklar gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, PROMETHEE II yönteminin hayvan refahı gibi çok boyutlu ve karmaşık bir konunun değerlendirilmesinde etkili ve sistematik bir yaklaşım sunduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

PROMETHEE II , Hayvan refahı , sığır işletmeleri , çok kriterli karar verme , tarım işletmeciliği

References

• [1] Şahin, M. and Ercan, E. (2010). Use of Cubic Spline Regressions in Modeling Lactation Curves in Dairy Cattle. KSÜ Journal of Natural Sciences, 13(2), 17-22.
• [2] Brans, J. P., Vincke, P. and Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European journal of operational research, 24(2), 228-238.
• [3] Abdullah, L., Chan, W. and Afshari, A. (2019). Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: a comparative result based on preference functions. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(2), 271-285.
• [4] Tuğrul, F. (2022a). An Evaluation of Supermarkets From the Lens of Multiple Criteria: The Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method, Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 5(4), 146-150.
• [5] Tuğrul, F. (2022b). An Innovative Application on Supermarket Selection Through Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method, Sakarya University Journal of Science, 26(5), 2029-2039.
• [6] Gök, Y., Şahin, M. and Yavuz, E. (2021). Comparative Investigation of Individual Lactation Curve Models in Some Cattle Breeds. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature. 24(5), 1118-1125.
• [7] Soydan, E., Ocak, N. and Onder, H. (2009). Conception of Jersey cattle in Turkey. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41(4), 623-628.
• [8] Taherdoost, H. and Madanchian, M. (2023). Using PROMETHEE method for multi-criteria decision making: applications and procedures. Iris Journal of Economics & Business Management, 1(1).
• [9] Tuğrul, F., Çitil, M., Karasolak, B. and Dağlı, M. (2020). Interpretation of Physical Conditions of Schools with Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making, Journal of Universal Mathematics, 3(1), 46-52.
• [10] Tuğrul, F. and Çitil, M. (2022). Application of Mathematical Modeling in Multi Criteria Decision Making Process: Intuitionistic Fuzzy PROMETHEE, Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Modelling, 5(2), 48-56.
• [11] Bogdanovic, D., Nikolic, D., & Ilic, I. (2012). Mining method selection by integrated AHP and PROMETHEE method. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 84, 219-233.
• [12] Gul, M., Celik, E., Gumus, A. T., & Guneri, A. F. (2018). A fuzzy logic based PROMETHEE method for material selection problems. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 68-79.
• [13] Feng, F., Xu, Z., Fujita, H. and Liang, M. (2020). Enhancing PROMETHEE method with intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(7), 1071-1104.
• [14] Önder, H. 2018. Nonparametric statistical methods used in biological experiments. BSJ Eng Sci, 1(1), 1-6.
• [15] Süzulmuş, S. and Polat, Y. (2022). Ranking of Cattle Farms According to Animal Welfare Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. Iksad Publications.
• [16] Liu, H. C., Li, Z., Song, W. and Su, Q. (2017). Failure mode and effect analysis using cloud model theory and PROMETHEE method. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 66(4), 1058-1072.
• [17] Beycioğlu, T. and Kıllı, F. (2025). Investigation of Agronomic and Physiological Performances of Different Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varieties in Denizli Ecology. International Journal of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, 9(2), 617-626.
• [18] Önder, H. and Tırınk, C. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis for Genomic Selection Studies in Animal Science. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 12(3), 1849-1856.