THE DIMENSIONS OF REFLECTION: A CONCEPTUAL AND CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS

Abstract

In the article, authors identify some of the problems in the present notions of reflective teaching. The authors argue that none of these conceptions deal with reflection itself in a reflexive way. They tend to use theories of reflection as a canopy for their own "middle level" theorizing about reflective teaching. First, the authors consider the development of the term and some of its popularization in teacher education. Some problems the authors identify are located in the history of the concept "reflection" and its philosophical underpinnings. Others emerge from particular applications within teacher education itself. Their critique challenges the prevalent conceptions of reflection and proceeds to offer new direction for further reconstruction of the theory and practice of reflective teaching. The final section offers an alternative conceptualization of “reflection” designed to address many of the concerns the authors raise, while acknowledging that some will always need to be addressed as a continual process.

References

1. Apple, Michael W. (1982). Education and Power. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2. Apple, Michael W. (1983). Curricular Form and the Logic of Technical Control. In: Michael W. Apple and Lois Weis, Ideology and Practice in Schooling, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3. Apple, Michael W. (1986). Teachers and Texts. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4. Belenky, Mary Field, et al. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing, New York: Basic Books.
5. Benhabib, Seyla, (1986a). The Generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and Feminist theory. Praxis International 5: 4.
6. Benhabib, Seyla (1986b). Critique, Norm and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, New York, Columbia University Press.
7. Bourdieu, Pierre & Passeron, Jean-Claude (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture, London: Sage.
8. Carr, Wilfred & Kemmis, Stephen (1986). Becoming Critical: Knowledge and Action Research, Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

9. Cruickshank, D.R. (1985). Uses and Benefits of Reflective Teaching. Phi Delta Kappan 66(10), 704-706.
10. Cruickshank, D.R., el al., (1981). Reflective Teaching, Bloomington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa.
11. de Lauretis, Teresa, (1986). Feminist Studies/Critical Studies, Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Dewey, John, (1933). How We Think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago: Henry Regnery and Co.
13. Elliott, John and Adelman, Clem, (1973). Reflecting Where the Action Is: The Design of the Ford Teaching Project. Education for Teaching 92: 8-20.
14. Gilligan, Carol, (1982). In a Different Voice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15. Gore, Jennifer M., (1987). Reflecting on Reflective Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. March-April 33-39.
16. Grant, Carl A., (Ed.), (1984). Preparing for Reflective Teaching, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Grant, Carl A. & Zeichner, Kenneth M., (1984). On Becoming a Reflective Teacher. In: Carl A. Grant, Preparing for Reflective Teaching, Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 1-18.
18. Grundy, Shirley, (1982). Three Modes of Action Research. Curriculum Perspectives 2: 3: 23-34.
19. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I, Boston: Beacon Press.
20. Habermas, J., (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. II, Boston: Beacon Press.
21. Holmes Group (1986). Tomorrow's Teachers, East Lansing, Michigan: The Holmes Group.
22. Hursh, David (1988). Progress and Problems in Becoming Reflective. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April, 1988.
23. Kemmis, Stephen (1983). Action Research and the Politics of Reflection". In: David Boud, Rosemary Keogh, and David Walker, (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, London: Kogan Page: 139-163.
24. Kemmis, Stephen, et al. (1982). The Action Research Reader, Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
25. Komisar, B. Paul and McClellan, James E. (1961). The Logic of Slogans; In: B. Othanel Smith and Robert H. Emis, Language and Concepts in Education, Chicago: Rand McNally: 195-215.
26. Lieberman, Ann and Miller, Lynne (1984). Teachers, Their World, Their Work, Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27. Liston, Daniel P. and Zeichner, Kenneth M. (1987a). Teaching Student Teachers to Reflect, Harvard Educational Review 57: 1: 23-48.
28. Liston, Daniel P. and Zeichner, Kenneth M. (1987b). Critical Pedagogy and Teacher Education. Journal of Education 169: 3: 117-138.
29. Martin, Biddy (1982). Feminism, Criticism, and Foucault. New German Critique 27: 3-30.
30. Martin, Biddy and Mohanti, Chandra Talpada (1986). Feminist Politics: What's Home Got to Do with It? .In: Teresa de Lauretis, Feminist Studies/Critical Studies, Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin Press.
31. Noddings, Nel (1984). Caring, Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Pratt, Minnie Bruce (1984). Identity: Skin Blood Heart. In: Elly Bulkin, et al., Yours in Struggle, N.Y.: Long Haul Press.
33. Schon, Donald A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, New York: Basic Books.
34. Schon, Donald A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Schweichart, Patrocino (1985). What are we doing, really? - Feminist criticism and the problem of theory. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 9: 1-2: 148-164.
36. Stenhouse, Lawrence (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development, London: Heinemann.
37. van Manen, Max (1977). Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical. Curriculum Inquiry 6:3: 205-228.
38. Zeichner, Kenneth M. (1980). The student teaching seminar: a vehicle for the development of reflective teachers", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Washington, D.C., February, 1980.
39. Zeichner, Kenneth M. (1981-1982). Reflective Teaching and Field-based Experience in Teacher Education. Interchange 12: 4: 1-22.
40. Zeichner, Kenneth M. and Liston, Daniel P. (1985). Varieties of Discourse in Supervisory Conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education 1: 2: 155-174. Notes
41. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
42. Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April, 1988. The present paper benefited from
43. the thoughtful and caring comments of Michael Apple and Fazal Rizvi. Authors’ Details
44. *Susan Noffke is an associate professor at the department of Curriculum and Instruction in the
45. University of Illnois. She has done historical/conceptual work in social studies as well as some
46. analysis of her own practice as a social studies teacher educator, both of these with a particular
47. eye toward issues of anti-racist education.
48. **Marie Brennan is the Dean of Education and Head of School at the University of South
49. Australia. Prior to this appointment in 2002, her previous academic jobs were at the University
50. of Canberra, Central Queensland University and Deakin Universities. Her research interests
51. include policy, education reform, student participation and action research.
52. Appendix: The Dimensions of Reflection