Imagining the Impossible: Revolutionary Critical Pedagogy Against the 21st Century American Imperium

Year 2006, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 21 - 46, 01.12.2006

Valerie Scatamburlodannibale

Abstract

This article examines some of the major Marxist-humanist themes that animate the revolutionary critical pedagogy delineated by Peter McLaren in recent years. Among these themes are radical universalism, an interrogation of the capitalization and commodification of human labor, and the interrelatedness of American imperialism and neoliberal globalized capitalism. It argues that McLaren’s scholarship provides progressive educationalists with an alternative to those “post-alized” and liberal humanist versions of critical pedagogy that have virtually abandoned all forms of class analysis. It contends that revolutionary critical pedagogy offers a much-needed narrative capable of challenging the most recent manifestations of empire, wars of aggression, and exploitative capitalist relations

References

• Ahmad, A. (1998). The communist manifesto and the problem of universality. Monthly Review, 50(2): 12-23.
• Ahmad, A. (1997). Culture, nationalism and the role of intellectuals. In E. M. Wood, & J. B. Foster (Eds.), In defence of history: Marxism and the postmodern agenda (pp. 51-64). New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Amin, S. (1998). Spectres of capitalism: A critique of current intellectual fashion. New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Arnove, A. (May/June 2006). The new white man's burden. International Socialist Review, (47), 39-43.
• Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: Free Press.
• Beinart, P. (2006). The good fight: Why liberals--and only liberals--can win the war on terror and make America great again . New York: Harper Collins.
• Bernstein, R. (1992). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity . Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Bloch, E. (1995). The principle of hope, volume one [Das Prinzip Hoffnung] . Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Boot, M. (May 5, 2003). American imperialism? no need to run away from label. [Electronic version]. USA Today, pp. 1-3. Retrieved July 18, 2006, from www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2003-05-05-boot_x.htm database.
• Casali, A., & Freire Ana Maria Araujo. (2005). Peter McLaren: Creative dissent. In M. Pruyn, & L. M. Huerta-Charles (Eds.), Teaching Peter McLaren: Paths of dissent (pp. 20-29). New York: Peter Lang.
• Cole, M. (2005). The 'inevitability of globalized capital' versus the 'ordeal of the undecidable': A marxist critique. In M. Pruyn, & L. M. Huerta-Charles (Eds.), Teaching Peter McLaren: Paths of dissent (pp. 101-125). New York: Peter Lang.
• Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high-technology capitalism. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
• Eagleton, T. (1997). Where do postmodernists come from?. In E. M. Wood, & J. B. Foster (Eds.), In defense of history: Marxism and the postmodern agenda (pp. pp. 17-25). New York: MOnthly Review Press.
• Eagleton, T. (1996). The illusions of postmodernism . Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
• Foster, J. B. (2006). Naked imperialism: The U.S. pursuit of global dominance . New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Foster, J. B. (2002). It is not a postcapitalist world, nor is it a post-marxist one. Monthly Review, 54(5): 42-47.
• Foster, J.B., & McChesney, R. (2004). Pox Americana: Exposing the American empire. New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things. New York: Vintage Books.
• Friedman, T. L. (1999, March 28). A manifesto for the fast world. [Electronic version]. New York Times, pp. 1-16. Retrieved June 27, 2006, from www.globalpolicy.org/nations/fried99.htm database.
• Galeano, E. (2003). Terror in disguise. The Progressive, February 2003 pp. 18-19.
• Gimenez, M. (2001). Marxism and class, gender and race: Rethinking the trilogy. Race, Gender & Class, 8(2): 23-33.
• Greider, W. (1998). One world, ready or not: The manic logic of global capitalism. New York: Touchstone.
• Hartman, T. (2004). Unequal protection: The rise of corporate dominance and the theft of human rights. New York: Rodale.
• Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
• Harvey, D. (1998). The practical contradictions of marxism. Critical Sociology, 24(1 &2), 1-36.
• Heller, A., & Feher, F. (1991). The grandeur and twilight of radical universalism. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
• Herman, E. (2002, November). The cruise missile left: Aligning with power. Z Magazine, 15 (11). Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://smagsite.zmag.org/Nov2002/Herman1102.htm database.
• Jameson, F. (1998). The cultural turn. London & New York: Verso.
• Jeffery, C. (2006). Poor losers: How the poor get dinged at every turn. Mother Jones, 31(4): 20-21.
• Juhasz, A. (2006). The bush agenda: Invading the world, one economy at a time. New York: Harper Collins.
• Kang, L. (1992). Subjectivity, marxism and cultural theory in china. Social Text, 10(2 & 3), 114-140.
• Kovel, J. (1991). History and spirit: An inquiry into the philosophy of liberation. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
• Lears, J. (2006, June 12). Keeping it real. The Nation, 282(23), 23-25, 28-30.
• Luxemburg, R. (1971). Selected political writings of Rosa Luxemburg. (Ed.) D. Howard. New York & London: Monthly Review Press.
• Lyotard, J. F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Mahajan, R. (2003). Full spectrum dominance: U.S. power in iraq. New York: Seven Stories Press.
• Malik, K. (1997). The mirror of race: Postmodernism and the celebration of difference. In E. M. Wood, & J. B. Foster (Eds.), In defense of history: Marxism and the postmodern agenda (pp. 112-133). New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Mann, M. (2003). Incoherent empire. London & New York: Verso.
• Marcuse, H. (1972). Counter-revolution and revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Marx, K. (1978). Theses on feuerbach. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (Second Edition ed.) (pp. 143-145). New York, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. (Trans.) M. Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• McChesney, R. (1999). Introduction. Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order (pp. 7-16). New York: Seven Stories Press.
• McLaren, P. (2007). Life in schools (5th ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Education.
• McLaren, P. (2006). Rage and hope: Interviews with peter McLaren on war, imperialism, and critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang.
• McLaren, P. (2005). Capitalists & conquerors: A critical pedagogy against empire. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• McLaren, P. (2000). Che guevara, paulo freire, and the pedagogy of revolution. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
• McLaren, P. (1994). Postmodernism and the death of politics: A braziliam reprieve. In P. McLaren, & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Politics of liberation: Paths from Freire (pp. pp. 193-215). London & New York: Routledge.
• McLaren, P., & da Silva, Tomaz Tadeu. (1993). Decentering pedagogy: Critical literacy, resistance and the politics of memory. In P. McLaren, & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo freire: A critical encounter (pp. 47-89). New York: Routledge.
• McLaren, P., & Farahmandpur, R. (2004). Teaching against global capitalism and the new imperialism. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefied Publishers.
• McLaren, P., & Martin, G. (2005). The legend of the bush gang: Imperialism, war, and propaganda. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Capitalists & conquerors: A critical pedagogy against empire (pp. 189-212). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
• McLaren, P., & Scatamburlo-D’Annibale, V. (2004). Paul Willis, class consciousness, and critical pedagogy. In. N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 41-60). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
• McMurtry, J. (2002). Value wars: The global market versus the life economy. London: Pluto Press.
• McNally, D. (2002). Another world is possible: Globalization and anti-capitalism. Winnipeg, Canada: Arbeiter Ring Publishing.
• Meszaros, I. (2001). Socialism or barbarism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Nederveen-Pieterse, J. (1990). Empire and emancipation. London: Pluto Press.
• Noonan, J. (2003). Critical humanism and the politics of difference. Montreal & Kingston: McGill- Queen's University Press.
• O'Neill, J. (1995). The poverty of postmodernism. London & New York: Routledge.
• Palmer, B. D. (1981). The making of E.P. thompson: Marxism, humanism, and history. Toronto, Ontario: New Hogtown Press.
• Panitch, Leo et al. (2000). Preface. In L. Panitch, & C. Leys (Eds.), Working classes, global realities (pp. viii-xi). New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Petras, J. (2000). A marxist critique of post-marxists. Links (9), June 14, 2000
• Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalization unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st century. New York: Zed Books.
• Rieff, D. (2006). We are the world. The Nation, 283(1): 31-32,-34, 36, 38, 40.
• Roy, A. (2004[a]). An ordinary person's guide to empire. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press.
• Roy, A. (2004[b]). The new American century. The Nation, 278(3): 11-14.
• Saad-Filho, A. (2003). Introduction. In Saad-Filho (Ed.), Anti-capitalism: A marxist introduction (pp. 123-). London: Pluto Press.
• Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Random House.
• Scatamburlo-D'Annibale, V., & Langman, L. (2002). Fanon speaks to the subaltern. In J. Lehman (Ed.), Bringing capitalism back for critique by social theory: Current perspectives in social theory, vol. 21 (pp. 253-284). New York: JAI Publishing.
• Scatamburlo-D'Annibale, V., & McLaren, P. (2004). Class dismissed? historical materialism and the politics of 'difference'. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(2), 183-199.
• Scatamburlo-D'Annibale, V., & McLaren, P. (2003). Operation human freedom. The Hobgoblin: A Journal of Marxist-Humanism, (5): 5-8.
• Scatamburlo-D'Annibale, V., & McLaren, P. (2003). The strategic centrality of class in the politics of 'race' and 'difference'. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies, 3(2), 148-175.
• Singer, D. (1999). Whose millenium: Theirs or ours? . New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Soper, K. (1986). Humanism and anti-humanism. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court.
• Starr, A. (2000). Naming the enemy: Anti-corporate movements confront globalization . London: Zed Books.
• Thompson, E. P. (1979). C. Wright Mills: The responsible craftsman. Radical America, 13(4), 70-71.
• Thompson, E. P. (1978). The poverty of theory. New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Whitney, M. (June 8, 2006). Afghanistan's second intifada. Retrieved June 20, 2006 from www.zmag.org
• Wray, M. (March 1998). Left conservatism: A conference report. Bad Subjects. Retrieved March 19, 1999 from http://english-www.hss.cmu.edu/bs/37/wray/html
• Young, R. (1990). White mythologies: Writing history and the west. London: Routledge. Notes
• i] The “old bearded devil” is a phrase which McLaren has often used to refer to Marx.
• ii] Typical of this posturing is the stance taken by Max Boot, a “scholar” funded by the conservative Olin
• Foundation who proclaimed that the U.S. government should embrace the practice of imperialism and impose
• American “values” on various populations “at gunpoint if need be” (Boot, 2003).
• iii] For a critique of this notion of America’s “good exceptionalism,” see Rieff, 2006. For an example of “liberal”
• narratives about America’s benevolence, see Beinart, 2006.
• iv] This according to the State of Food Insecurity in the World 2005.
• v] I should caution my readers that I do not attempt anything resembling a full-scale treatment of Thompson’s life
• work. Rather, I draw upon Thompson in relation to a discussion of Marxism and political commitment and more
• importantly, the spirit which motivated Thompson to write The Poverty of Theory.
• vi] The accusation of theoreticism is not intended as a form of anti-intellectual posturing. Rather, it is to raise the
• issue of the inadequacy of those forms of theorizing that so monolithically reject any theme even remotely
• associated with the legacy of Marxism and humanism.
• vii] For an elaboration on the distinction between the ‘subject’ and the ‘self,’ see Scatamburlo-D’Annibale & Langman, 2002.
• ix] See, for example, McLaren & da Silva, 1993.
• x] For an elaboration of this line of argument, see Scatamburlo-D’Annibale & McLaren, 2003.
• xi] PNAC stands for the Project for the New American Century. For a brief discussion of PNAC’s aspirations of
• American global rule, see Scatamburlo-D’Annibale & McLaren’s (2003) “Operation Human Freedom.”
• xii] For an extended discussion on Marxian formulations of class, see McLaren & Scatamburlo, 2004.