Devletin Hacmini Belirleyen Faktörler: Ampirik bir Analiz

Year 2017, , 81 - 92, 05.09.2017

Nazlı Keyifli Sacit Hadi Akdede

https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.327876

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu
çalışmanın amacı ülkeler arasındaki devletin boyutundaki faklılıkları ortaya
koyacak çeşitli politik, ekonomik ve demografik faktörleri belirlemektir.
Çalışmada, Dünya Bankası’nın veri tabanında bulunan 81 ülkenin 1990-2015 dönemi
yıllık verileri kullanılarak söz konusu değişkenler ile devletin ekonomik hacmi
arasındaki ilişki panel veri analiz yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Devletin
boyutunu ölçmede devletin nihai tüketim harcamalarının gayri safi yurt içi
hasılaya oranı ölçüm birimi olarak kullanılmıştır. Başlıca bulgularımız
şunlardır. Politik kutuplaşma (political polarizaiton), gelir eşitsizliği,
nüfus yoğunluğu, kişibaşı gayri safi yurtiçi hasıla büyümesi, ülkenin federal
bir yapıda olması ile devletin boyutu arasında anlamlı ve negatif bir ilişki, demokrasi,
siyasi ayrışma (fractionalizaiton) ve dini ayrışma (religious
fractionalizaiton) ile devletin boyutu arasında ise anlamlı ve pozitif bir
ilişki vardır.

Keywords

Kamu Büyüklüğü, Politik Kutuplaşma, Panel Veri

Determinants of Government Size: An Empirical Analysis

Abstract

The
purpose of the study is to identify various political, economic and demographic
factors that will set out the differences in the size of government across
countries. In this study, the effect of political, economic and demographic
factors on government size will be analyzed by using panel data analysis method
by using 1990-2015 data of the 81 countries included in the World Bank
Database. In order to measure the size of government, namely, the dependent
variable is government final consumption expenditure as a share of the gross
domestic product. Our main findings are as follows. Between political
polarization, income inequality, population density, per capita gross domestic
product growth, the countries' federal structure and the size of government
have a meaningful and negative relationship while democracy, fractionalization,
religious fractionalization and the size of government have a significant and
positive relationship.

Keywords

Government Size, Political Polarization, Panel Data

References

• Adserà, A., Boix, C. & Payne, M. (2003). “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government”, Journal of Law Economics and Organization, Vol. 19 (2), pp. 445-490.
• Afonso, A. & Jalles, J.T. (2016). “Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality”, Empirica, 43(1), pp.83-109.
• Akbulut, H. (2015). “Kamu Sektörünün Hacmi: Trükiye-Avrupa Birliği Karşılaştırması”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 48 (3), ss.41-59.
• Alesina, A., Baqir, R. & Easterly, W. (1999). “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (4), pp.1243-1284.
• Annet, A. (2000). “Social Fractionalization, Political Instability, and the Size of Government”, Washington:IMF.
• Bawn, K. & Rosenbluth, F. (2006). “Short versus long coalitions: electoral accountability and the size of the public sector”, American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), pp.251-265.
• Blais, A., Blake, D. & Dion, S. (1993). “Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies”, American Journal of Political Science, 37 (1), pp.40-62.
• Dash, B., B. & Raja, A., V. (2012). “Political Determinants of the Allocation of Public Expenditures: A Study of the Indian States”, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy,Working Paper No.2012-101, pp. 4-27.
• Gramc, B. (2007). “Factor of the size of government in developed countries”, Prague Economic Papers, 16 (2), pp.130-142.
• Hausman, J., A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, No: 46 (2), pp. 1251-1271.
• Hsiao, C. (2007). “Panel Data Analysis-Advantages and Challenges”, 16 (1), pp.1-22.
• Husted, T., A. &Kenny, L.,W. (1997). “The Effecr of the Expansion of the Voting Franchise on the Size of Government”, Journal of Political Economy, 105 (1), pp.54-82.
• Lindqvist, E. & Östling, R. (2010). “Political Polarization and the Size of Government”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 104 (3), pp. 543-565.
• Melzer, A., H. & Richard, S., F. (1981). “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government”, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (5), pp.914-927.
• Mukherjee, B. (2003). “Political Parties and the Size of Governmet in Multiparty Legislatures Examining Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 36 (6), pp. 699-728.
• Pevcin, P. (2004). “Cross-Country Differences in Governmet Sector Activities”, Zb.Rad.-Sveuc.u Rij.,Ekon,fak.,god., Vol. 22 (2), pp. 41-59.
• Pluemper, T. & Martin, C., W. (2003). “Democracy, Government Spending, and Economic Growth: A Political-Economic Explanation of the Barro-effect”, Public Choice, 117 (1-2), pp.27-50.
• Posner, R. A. (1971). “Taxation by Regulation”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), pp.22-50.
• Ricciuti, R. (2004). “Political fracmentation and fiscal outcomes”, Public Choice, 118 (3), pp.365-388.
• Rodrik, D. (1998). “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Government?”, Journal of Political Economy, 106 (5), pp.997-1032.
• Tatoğlu, Y., F. (2013). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı, 2. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
• Wooldridge, M., J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge: The MIT Press.