Research Article

Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm

Volume: 5 Number: 1 May 1, 2023
TR EN

Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm

Abstract

Antagonism, in the language of agonistic democracy, refers to the conflict between opposing parties. These opposing parties do not recognize each other as legitimate voices. In the context of the election in the Philippines, the emergence of this kind of conflict is manifested during the opposing preferences will meet as they will express their political color. There are significant numbers of literature that discussed the nature of antagonistic conflict in the politics of the Philippines. For instance, patron-client describes the dyadic connection between patron and client through a personal relationship. However, this personal relationship is marked by conflict in personal interests. On the other hand, the moralization of politics has a nature of conflict based on two opposing sectors, the mass sphere, and the civil sphere. In which, the divide is determined by the socioeconomic status of the people. Although there are analyses that explain the possible reasons for these political conflicts, they fail to capture the nature of conflict during the election in the Philippines. The conflict will occur when people engage during the election and will be vocal about their preferred candidates. This article will try to explain the nature of conflict during elections using the Agonistic Democracy framework of Chantal Mouffe. Mouffe explains that there is a conflict between opposing parties because neither of the parties recognizes each other as legitimate or important. Rather the conflict is gapped by friend/enemy relation. Using the framework of Chantal Mouffe, this article will argue that the divide neglects the electoral process and undermines the essence of democracy that is manifested in elections. One of the ways to overcome this problem is to recognize the impossibility of eradicating the different preferences of the people in choosing a candidate

Keywords

Supporting Institution

N/A

Project Number

N/A

Thanks

N/A

References

  1. Agoncillo, Teodoro. History of the Filipino People. 903 Quezon Boulevard, Quezon City: R.P. GARCIA Publishing Co.,
  2. Anderson, Benedict. Cacique Democracy in the Philippines: Origins and Dreams. Routledge, 1998.
  3. Aquino, Ranhilio. War of Classes. February 16, 2022. https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/02/16/opinion/columns/war-of-the-classes/1833135?fbclid= IwAR0yFHS3np-VtUQbF-NTcbnX2m8fsN_t7JRfNZwMRMSSD7Sb78VGbz1UTbI.
  4. Arambala, Gerry. “Radical Leadership in Post-Parojinog Ozamis Politics.” European Journal of Research, no. 11-12, (November 2018):82.
  5. Cupin, Bea. In vote-rich Quezon City, Uniteam promises a ‘New Society’ but still no concrete plans. February 15, 2022. https://www.rappler.com/nation/elections/uniteam-bets-promise-new-society-without-concrete-plans-rally-quezon-city/.
  6. Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, “Leni Robredo: The Last Man Standing is a Woman,” Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, April 19, 2020. https://www.freiheit.org/leni-robredo-last-man-standing-woman.
  7. Gomes, Robin. Philippine Election: Bishops urge voters to keep at heart the common good. March 28, 2022. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2022-03/philippines-bishops-pastoral-letter-election-2022-common-good.html.
  8. Gregorio, Xave. Over 1200 Catholic clergy endorse Robredo- Pangilinan in ‘the battle for truth. May 4, 2022. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2022/05/04/2178710/over-1200-catholic-clergy-endorse-robredo-pangilinan-battle-truth.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Political Science

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 1, 2023

Submission Date

November 28, 2022

Acceptance Date

March 11, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Hıpolao, C. (2023). Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. International Journal of Politics and Security, 5(1), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1210896
AMA
1.Hıpolao C. Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. IJPS. 2023;5(1):145-162. doi:10.53451/ijps.1210896
Chicago
Hıpolao, Chrıstıan. 2023. “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”. International Journal of Politics and Security 5 (1): 145-62. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1210896.
EndNote
Hıpolao C (May 1, 2023) Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. International Journal of Politics and Security 5 1 145–162.
IEEE
[1]C. Hıpolao, “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”, IJPS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 145–162, May 2023, doi: 10.53451/ijps.1210896.
ISNAD
Hıpolao, Chrıstıan. “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”. International Journal of Politics and Security 5/1 (May 1, 2023): 145-162. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1210896.
JAMA
1.Hıpolao C. Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. IJPS. 2023;5:145–162.
MLA
Hıpolao, Chrıstıan. “Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm”. International Journal of Politics and Security, vol. 5, no. 1, May 2023, pp. 145-62, doi:10.53451/ijps.1210896.
Vancouver
1.Chrıstıan Hıpolao. Analyzing Antagonism in the Election of the Philippines Using Agonistic Democracy Paradigm. IJPS. 2023 May 1;5(1):145-62. doi:10.53451/ijps.1210896

© intpolsec, 2019

Open access journal | No APCs | Double-blind peer review | CC BY 4.0