Constructing Connectivity, Building Trust: The Evolving Dynamics of China-Bangladesh Relations

Abstract

This study examines how regional connectivity has become a pivotal force shaping the economic trajectory of emerging states, with Bangladesh standing at a particularly consequential crossroads. As global and regional powers invest in new corridors, ports, and transport networks, connectivity is no longer merely an infrastructural matter it is a political and developmental choice that influences how nations imagine their futures. China’s involvement, however, is deeply intertwined with its broader geopolitical ambitions, making the Sino-Bangladesh partnership both economically promising and strategically complex. Major projects such as the Padma Bridge and the Karnaphuli Tunnel exemplify the tangible benefits of BRI-linked investments, yet they also underscore the evolving geopolitical landscape in South Asia. This study, grounded in extensive secondary research, critically examines the dual nature of China’s engagement in Bangladesh balancing economic cooperation with strategic calculation. It explores key questions: What are the competing strategic interests of China and India in Bangladesh? Is China a reliable strategic ally or merely a transactional partner? The research assesses both the opportunities and risks embedded in BRI participation and outlines potential strategies for Bangladesh to assert its agency while avoiding overdependence on any single geopolitical actor. The study concludes by advocating for a nuanced, pragmatic foreign policy that prioritizes national interest and long-term sustainability in regional connectivity efforts.

Keywords

• BRI
• Geopolitics
• Economic Diplomacy
• Regional Connectivity
• Bilateral Relations

Constructing Connectivity, Building Trust: The Evolving Dynamics of China-Bangladesh Relations

Abstract

Bu çalışma, bölgesel bağlantısallığın yükselen devletlerin ekonomik yönelimini şekillendiren belirleyici bir güç hâline nasıl geldiğini incelemekte; Bangladeş’in ise bu süreçte özellikle kritik bir kavşakta durduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Küresel ve bölgesel güçlerin yeni koridorlara, limanlara ve ulaşım ağlarına yatırım yaptığı bir ortamda, bağlantısallık artık yalnızca altyapısal bir mesele değildir; ulusların geleceklerini nasıl tahayyül ettiklerini etkileyen siyasal ve kalkınmacı bir tercihtir. Ancak Çin’in bu alandaki rolü, daha geniş jeopolitik hedefleriyle derinden iç içe geçmiş durumdadır; bu da Çin–Bangladeş ortaklığını hem ekonomik açıdan umut vadeden hem de stratejik açıdan karmaşık kılmaktadır. Padma Köprüsü ve Karnaphuli Tüneli gibi büyük ölçekli projeler, Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi (BRI) bağlantılı yatırımların somut faydalarını örneklerken, aynı zamanda Güney Asya’daki değişen jeopolitik manzarayı da gözler önüne sermektedir.Kapsamlı ikincil araştırmalara dayanan bu çalışma, Çin’in Bangladeş’teki angajmanının ikili doğasını—ekonomik iş birliği ile stratejik hesap arasında denge kurma çabasını—eleştirel biçimde incelemektedir. Şu temel sorular ele alınmaktadır: Bangladeş bağlamında Çin ve Hindistan’ın rekabet eden stratejik çıkarları nelerdir? Çin güvenilir bir stratejik müttefik midir, yoksa yalnızca işlemsel bir ortak mıdır? Araştırma, BRI’ye katılımın içerdiği fırsatları ve riskleri değerlendirirken, Bangladeş’in herhangi bir tek jeopolitik aktöre aşırı bağımlılıktan kaçınarak kendi öznelliğini nasıl güçlendirebileceğine dair olası stratejileri de ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, sonuç olarak, bölgesel bağlantısallık çabalarında ulusal çıkarı ve uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirliği önceleyen, incelikli ve pragmatik bir dış politika yaklaşımını savunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi (BRI)
• jeopolitik
• ekonomik diplomasi
• bölgesel bağlantısallık
• ikili ilişkiler

References

1. Ahmed, T. (2025). Enabling sustained labour rights in Bangladesh: Institutional reforms. The Business Standard. https://www.tbsnews.net/supplement/enabling-sustained-labour-rights-bangladesh-institutional-reforms-1056251
2. Ali, M., Faqir, K., Haider, B., Shahzad, K., & Nosheen, N. (2022). Environmental implications of the Belt and Road for South Asia. Frontiers in Public Health. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.876606/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.876606
3. Akter, S. N., Bi, S., Qiu, X., & Sarker, M. N. I. (2023). Technological prospects of Belt and Road Initiative in Bangladesh. Heliyon, 9(7), e17549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17549
4. Alden, C. (2007). China in Africa. Zed Books.
5. Amin, A. (2025). Sino-Indian rivalry in the Indo-Pacific and Bangladesh’s geostrategic moment. Asia and Africa Today, 4(5), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00144-1
6. Anas, O. (2020). The evolution of Turkey’s Asia policy in historical and contemporary perspectives. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 14(3), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2020.1808379
7. Anwar, A. (2022, August 18). China–Bangladesh relations: A three-way balance between China, India, and the US. Mercator Institute for China Studies. https://merics.org/en/china-bangladesh-relations-three-way-balance-between-china-india-and-us
8. Asian Strategic Leadership Institute. (2022). China–Myanmar economic corridor: Strategic implications for Bay of Bengal geopolitics. ASLI Centre for Public Policy Studies.

9. Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association. (2023). Trade and industry statistics. https://www.bgmea.com.bd
10. Bhattacharjee, J. (2018). Decoding the China–Bangladesh relationship. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/41935-decoding-china-bangladesh-relationship/
11. Bhattacharjee, K. (2020). Sheikh Hasina did not meet the Indian envoy despite requests: Dhaka Daily. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sheikh-hasina-did-not-meet-indian-envoy-despite-requests-dhaka-daily/article32187068.ece
12. Bhuiyan, M. S. (2024). Understanding Bangladesh–China relations from “win–win” cooperation to strategic partnership. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2630531324500021
13. Bose, S. (2022). The Chittagong Port: Bangladesh’s trump card in its balancing diplomacy. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/bangladeshs-trump-card-in-its-diplomacy-of-balance/
14. BRI. (2019). The Belt and road initiative: Progress, contributions and prospects, 1st ed., pp. 1–69, Foreign Language Press.
15. Brewster, D. (2019). Bangladesh’s road to the BRI. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/bangladesh-s-road-bri
16. China’s Foreign Ministry. (2024). Nations reap benefits from BRI projects. Gov.cn. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202412/02/content_WS674d469fc6d0868f4e8ed961.html
17. Devonshire-Ellis, C. (2020). Opportunities for Bangladesh exporters as China reduces tariffs to zero on 97% of all products. China Briefing. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/opportunities-for-bangladesh-exporters-as-china-reduces-tariffs-to-zero-on-97-of-all-products/ Dunford M., Liu W. (2019). Chinese perspectives on the belt and road initiative. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(1), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy032
18. Enderwick, P. (2018). The economic growth and development effects of China’s one belt, one road initiative. Strategic Change, 27(5), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2229
19. Export Promotion Bureau Bangladesh. (2024). Export statistics report. Government of Bangladesh. https://epb.gov.bd
20. Feingold, S. (2023). China’s Belt and Road Initiative turns 10. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/11/china-belt-road-initiative-trade-bri-silk-road/
21. Ge, P. (2024). Selective industrial policy and overcapacity: Evidence from China’s heavy industries. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 200, 106907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.106907
22. Han Z., & Paul T. V. (2020). China’s rise and balance of power politics. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 13(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz018 Web of Science.
23. Haque, E. (2018). The impact of One Belt One Road initiative in the garment sector of Bangladesh. International Journal of Advanced Research, 6, 747–761. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/6491
24. Horn S., Reinhart C. M., Trebesch C. (2021). China's overseas lending. Journal of International Economics, 133, 103539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103539
25. Islam, N. (2025). China’s assistance for Bangladesh’s river management: Good or bad? Prothom Alo. https://en.prothomalo.com/opinion/op-ed/6sk1labq18
26. Jervis R. (2017). Perception and misperception in international politics (new ed.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77bx3
27. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S., Jr. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company.
28. Kobayashi, Y., & King, J. (2022). Myanmar’s strategy in the China–Myanmar Economic Corridor: A failure in hedging? International Affairs, 98(3), 1013–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac049
29. Karrar, H. H., & Mostowlansky, T. (2020). The belt and road as political technology: Power and economy in Pakistan and Tajikistan. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(5), 834–839. https://doi. org/10.1177/2399654420911410f
30. Lall S. V., Lebrand M. (2020). Who wins, who loses? Understanding the spatially differentiated effects of the belt and road initiative. Journal of Development Economics, 146, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102496
31. Li, Xiang, Mengqi Shao, and May Tan-Mullins, 'China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Debates, Impacts, and Trends' (2021), in Nalanda Roy (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies (New York, NY, online edn, Oxford Academic, (2017 ), https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.674
32. Li J., Liu B., Qian G. (2019). The belt and road initiative, cultural friction and ethnicity: Their effects on the export performance of SMEs in China. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.004
33. Mahmud, K. U. (2024). BRI and beyond: Strengthening Bangladesh-China relations amid political change. The Business Standard. https://www.tbsnews.net/thoughts/bri-and-beyond-strengthening-bangladesh-china-relations-amid-political-change-1023916
34. Malik, T. H. (2022). The Belt and Road Initiative, joint intellectual capital development towards industry value added of a partner economy. International Journal of Chinese Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X221144900
35. Malik, T. H., Xiang, T., & Huo, C. (2021). The transformation of national patents for high-technology exports: Moderating effects of national cultures. International Business Review, 30(1), 101771. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101771
36. McBride, J., Berman, N., & Chatzky, A. (2023). China’s massive Belt and Road Initiative. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative
37. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
38. Ministry of External Affairs. (2024). Bilateral brief – India–Bangladesh relations. Government of India. https://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/India-Bangladesh2024.pdf
39. Mostofa, M. (2025). Bangladesh in the USA–China–India triangle: Strategic autonomy and pragmatic diplomacy. Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies. ttps://bipss.org.bd/pdf/Bangladesh%20in%20the%20USA-China-India%20Triangle_Mohosina%20Mostofa.pdf
40. Observatory of Economic Complexity. (2024). Bangladesh–China trade (April 2024). https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/bgd
41. Ramachandran, S., (2019). How Bangladesh learned to love the Belt and Road. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2019/07/how-bangladesh-learned-to-love-the-belt-and-road/
42. Rahman, M. M. (2024). China's investment in Bangladesh: Backdrop of debt trap diplomacy. International Journal of Applied Research and Sustainable Sciences, 2(10), 841–854.https://doi.org/10.59890/ijarss.v2i10.2637
43. Rasool, A. (2022). Belt and Road Initiative’s regional impact: Lessons from South Asia. Journal of Indian and Asian Studies, 3(1), 2250003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2717541322500036
44. Razzaq, A., An, H., & Delpachitra, S. (2021). Does technology gap increase FDI spillovers on productivity growth? Evidence from Chinese outward FDI in Belt and Road host countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121050
45. Rizve, S. (2024). China–Bangladesh military exercises signal shifting geopolitical landscape. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2024/05/china-bangladesh-military-exercises-signal-shifting-geopolitical-landscape/
46. Salam, M. F. (2026). Between giants and tides: Bangladesh’s struggle for space in the Bay of Bengal and Indo-Pacific politics. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 22(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2026.22.1.10
47. Salam, M. F., Bhuiyan, M. S., & Nitu, N.-E. (2020). China’s approach towards Bangladesh: Development partner or claw of subjugation? Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 3(2), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.03.02.183
48. Salam, M. F., Mia, M. R., Lamisha, S. A., & Hemel, M. B. U. (2024). Embracing opportunities: Bangladesh’s foreign policy amid geopolitical challenges. Malaysian Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 96–122. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjir.vol12no1.6
49. Shawon, A. A. (2023). Bangladesh’s first submarine base starts operation on Monday. Dhaka Tribune. https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/307145/bangladesh%E2%80%99s-first-submarine-base-starts-operation
50. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2023). Trends in international arms transfers, 2022. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2023/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-international-arms-transfers-2022
51. Smith, J. M. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic implications and international opposition. https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-strategic-implications-and-international-opposition
52. The Business Standard. (2024). Safeguarding country’s economic interest easier if govt has legitimacy: Wahiduddin Mahmud. https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/safeguarding-countrys-economic-interest-easier-if-govt-has-legitimacy-wahiduddin-mahmud
53. The Daily Star. (2019). Belt and Road Initiative: Perspective from Bangladesh. https://www.thedailystar.net/round-tables/news/belt-and-road-initiative-perspective-bangladesh-1782928
54. T. V. Paul. (2024). The Sino-Indian rivalry and balance-of-power theory: Explaining India’s underbalancing. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 11(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970241282065
55. Urban, W. (2025, March). China’s Belt and Road Initiative revisited (FIW Policy Brief No. 66). FIW.
56. United Nations. (2024). UN COMTRADE database. https://comtrade.un.org
57. Wade, R. H. (2010). Industrial policy and the developmental state: New directions after the global crisis. Global Policy, 14(S1), 5–18.
58. Wahed, M. S., & Rahman, M. (2018). China’s outward foreign direct investment to Bangladesh: Perspectives of the host country stakeholders. Strategic Change, 27(5), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2230
59. Wang, R., & Liang, T. (2024). The “Belt and Road” Initiative and China’s sporting goods exports: Basic characteristics and policy evaluation. Heliyon, 10(13), e33189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33189
60. World Bank. (2023). Bangladesh development update: Trade and competitiveness. https://www.worldbank.org Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill. Xi Jinping. (2023, October 18). Building an open, inclusive and interconnected world for common development: Keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the Third Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202310/18/content_WS652fc328c6d0868f4e8e064e.html Yasmin, L. (2023). Understanding Bangladesh–China relations: Analysing the roles of individual and domestic factors, regional politics, and global perspectives. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 12(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2023.2300109