Ozone Diplomacy, Ozone Regime Negotiations and Arctic

Abstract

The most successful environmental regime negotiation was on the depletion of the ozone layer. As a result, it is necessary to briefly review the background of the ozone negotiations in terms of ozone science, agenda formation, and actors. This chapter follows the progression of ozone diplomacy over the decades, beginning with the 1985 Vienna Convention and leading to the 1987 Montreal Protocol and beyond. It also touches briefly on the effects of power and knowledge factors on ozone negotiations. The chapter closes with how the ozone regime has adopted new scientific knowledge and has been transformed by transnational epistemic communities and coalitions. This brief assessment of ozone negotiation processes provides a balanced account of science and policy and their interaction shaping the development of the ozone regime.

Keywords

• Ozone Depletion
• Ozone Hole
• Arctic
• Environmental Regime Negotiations
• Environmental Diplomacy

References

1. Abbasi, A. and Tasneem Abbasi, Ozone Hole: Past, Present, Future, New York: Springer, 2017.
2. Anand, Ruchi. International Environmental Justice: A North-South Dimension, Burlington, VT : Ashgate, 2004.
3. Andersen, Stephen O and K. Madhava Sarma. 2002. Protecting the Ozone Layer: The United Nations History, Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications, 2002.
4. Bartlett, Robert V., Priya A. Kurian and Madhu Malik. International Organizations and Environmental Policy, New York: Praeger, 1995.
5. Bayramoğlu, Banu. Ecological Threats and International Cooperation for A Common Future: The Case of Ozone Depletion, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Bilkent University, January 1993.
6. Benedick, Richard E. “Protecting the Ozone Layer: New Directions in Diplomacy’, ed. Jessica Tuchman Matthews, Preserving the Global Environment: The Challenge of Shared Leadership New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1991. 120-154.
7. Benedick, Richard E. 1998. Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet, Enlarged Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
8. Biswas, Asit K. The Ozone Layer: Proceedings of the Meeting of Experts Designated by Governments, Intergovernmental and Nongovernmental Organizations on the Ozone Layer Organized

9. by the United Nations Environment Programme in Washington D.C., 1-9 March 1977, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979.
10. Carter, Neil. The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy, 2nd ed., (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
11. Chasek, Pamela and Lynn M. Wagner. The Road from Rio: Lessons Learned from Twenty Years of Multilateral Environmental Negotiations, Appendix: Summaries of Selected Multilateral Environmental Agreements, New York: RFF Press, 2012.
12. Chasek, Pamela. Earth Negotiations: Analyzing Thirty Years of Environmental Diplomacy, New York: United Nations University Press, 2001.
13. Chasek, Pamela. “Lessons Learned in Multilateral Environmental Negotiations”, Improving Global Environmental Governance: Best Practices for the Architecture and Agency, eds. Noricha Kanie, Steinar Andresen and Peter M. Haas, New York: Routledge, 2014: 56-82.
14. Chasek, Pamela S., David L. Downie and Janet Welsh Brown, “Ozone Depletion”, The Globalization Reader, eds. Frank J. Lechner and John Boli, (West Sussex, UK: John Wiley&Sons, 2015): 526-530.
15. Chasek, Pamela S., David L. Downie and Janet Welsh Brown, Global Environmental Politics, 7th ed., New York: Routledge, 2018.
16. DeSombre, Elizabeth R. Global Environmental Institutions, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 2017.
17. EPA, EPA Strategic Plan: 2003-2008-Direction for the Future, (September 2003), https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=100048XS.TXT
18. Falkner, Robert. Business Power and Conflict in International Environmental Politics, New York, Palgrave, (2008): 71.
19. Greene, Owen. “The System for Implementation Review in the Ozone Regime”, The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice,
20. eds. David G. Victor, Kal Raustiala, and Eugene B. Skolnikoff, (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998): 89-136.
21. Grundmann, Reiner. Transnational Environmental Policy: Reconstructing Ozone, New York: Routledge, 2001.
22. Haas, Peter M. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination”, International Organization, vol.46, no.1, (Winter 1992): 1-35.
23. Haas, Peter M. “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone”, International Organization, vol.46, no.1, (Winter 1992): 187-224.
24. Haas, Peter M. “Epistemic Communities and the Dynamics of International Environmental Cooperation”, in Regime Theory and International Relations, ed. Volker Rittberger, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993): 168-202.
25. Haas, Peter M Stratospheric Ozone: Regime Formation in Stages, Polar Politics: Creating International Environmental Regimes, eds. Oran R. Young and Gail Osherenko, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, (1993): 152-185.
26. Hammitt, James K. “CFCs: A Look Across Two Continents”, Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe, eds. Winston Harrington,
27. Richard D. Morgenstern and Thomas Sterner (Washington D.C., USA: Resources for the Future, 2004): 158-173.
28. Hampson, Fen Osler and Michael Hart. Multilateral Negotiations: Lessons from Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
29. Hayse, Dennis. “Highest Disregard”, Mother Jones, vol. 14, no. 10, (December 1989): 33-48.
30. Johnson, Stanley. UNEP: The First 40 Years, Nairobi: UNEP; 2012.
31. Jurgielewicz, Lynne M. Global Environmental Change and International Law: Prospects for Progress in the Legal Order, Lanham: University Press of America, 1996.
32. Mullin, Richard P. “What Can Be Learned from DuPont and the Freon Ban: A Case Study”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 40, no. 3, (Oct. 2002): 207-218.
33. Özçelik, Sezai. “Climate Change Negotiations Positions of the United States, the European Union, and G-77/China before and after the Kyoto Treaty: 1995-2002”, Enerji ve Diplomasi Dergisi, cilt 1, sayı 2, (Yaz 2015): 34-60.
34. Özçelik, Sezai. “Uluslararası Çevre Rejimleri ve Görüşmeleri Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme: Yapısalcı, Kurumsal, Bilişsel ve Görüşme Teorileri”, Eskişehir OsmanGazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, cilt: 7, sayı: 1, (Nisan 2012): 231 – 250. Özçelik, Sezai. “Uluslararası Çevre Rejimleri ve Aktörler: Devletler, Hükümet-Dışı Aktörler, Uluslararası Örgütler, Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları ve Çok Uluslu Şirketler”,
35. der. Gökhan Orhan, Semra Cerit Mazlum ve Yasemin Kaya, Uluslararası Çevre Rejimleri, Bursa: Dora Yayınları, (2017): 31-67.
36. Özçelik, Sezai ve Ayşe Dilek Öğretir. “ The University Students Understanding and Perceptions of the Climate Change or Global Warming: Survey Results”, Akdeniz University,
37. 4th International, International Relations Congress Department of International Relations, ‘Features of Current International Relations’, May 26th, 2017 Friday.
38. Parson, Edward A. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Technology, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2003.
39. Porter, Gareth, Brown, Janet Welsh and Chasek, Pamela. Global Environmental Politics, 3rd ed, Boulder: Westview Press, 2000.
40. Rowlands, Ian H. The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.
41. Sitaraman, Srini. “Evolution of the Ozone Regime: Local, National, and International Influences”, The Environment, International Relations and U.S. Foreign Policy, ed. Paul G. Harris, Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, (2001): 111-133.
42. Sjostedt, Gunnar. “Issue Clarification and the Role of Consensual Knowledge in the UNCED Process”, Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons Learned From the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED),
43. eds. Bertram I. Spector, Gunnar Sjostedt, and William Zartman, (London: Graham Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, 1994): 63-86.
44. Skodvin, Tora. “The Ozone Regime, Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement, eds. Steinar Andresen, Tora Skodvin, Arild Underdal, and Jorgen Wettestad, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000): 122-145.
45. Soroos, Marvin S. and Lev Markovich Soroko. The Endangered Atmosphere: Preserving a Global Commons, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1997.
46. Sprinz, Detlef and T.Vaahtoranta. “The Interest-Based Explanation for International Air Pollution Control”, ed. Arild Underdal, The Politics of International Environmental Management, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers,1998.
47. Stevenson, H. and Dryzek, J. S., Democratizing Global Climate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
48. Stolarski, Richard S. “Ozone Depletion”, World Atlas of Atmospheric Pollution, ed. Ranjeet S. Sokhi, London: Anthem Press, (2008): 67-76.
49. Szell, Patrick. “Negotiations on the Ozone Layer”, International Environmental Negotiation, ed. Gunnar Sjostedt, New York: Sage Publications, (1993): 31-48.
50. Tabin, Shagoon. Global Warming: The Effects of Ozone Depletion, New Delhi: A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, 2008.
51. Tolba, Mostafa K. and Iwona Rummel-Bulska. Global Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating Environmental Agreements for the World, 1973-1992, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
52. Uberoi, N.K. Environmental Management, 2nd ed ., New Delhi: Excel Books, 2003.
53. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Changing Degrees: Steps to Reduce Greenhouse Gases, OTA,-O-482, Washington D.C.: US Government Printing Office, February 1991.
54. Yoshida, Osamu. The International Legal Regime for the Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone Layer, (Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2018.
55. Young, Oran R. “The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment”, International Environmental Governance, ed. Peter M. Haas , New York: Routledge, 2016: 89-116.
56. Wettestad, Jorgen. “The Vienna Convention and Montreal Protocol on Ozone-Layer Depletion”, Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, eds. Edward L Miles, et.al., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (2002): 149-172.