COMPARISON OF THE HUMANISTIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL (E-BOOK) METHODS IN TEACHING THE FAIRY TALES TO THE PRESCHOOLERS

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 76 - 91, 12.03.2021

Abdülkadir Kabadayı Fatma Doğan Kirişçigil

Abstract

The aim of this research was constituted to compare the effect of humanistic and technological (E-book) methods in teaching fairy tales to five years children who attend the pre-school training institution. For this aim, by giving teaching fairy tales with humanistic and technologic (E-book) methods, it was investigated which method was more effective for the five years children who attended the nursery class of The Çumra Abdullah Tenekeci Elementary School. A total of 42 students from the morning and afternoon group in nursery class joined to research. There were 22 girls and 20 boys students in the group. The research was a planned experimental study. According to this, the children were divided into two groups as experimental group and the control group. The Experimental Group has applied the humanistic teaching method and also Control Group has applied the telling fairy tale with the Technological (E-book) Teaching Method. In analyzing data, the independent test t was used. It was internalized the significance level of 0,05 at the significance control of difference. When asking the questions prepared to measure the levels of fairy tale comprehension and evaluating the endowed answers, between the groups in which humanistic method and technological (E-book) methods were used, it was found a significant difference at learning the fairy tale (p<0,05). The group who received the humanistic method was found to be more successful in realizing the fairy tale than the group who got the technological (E-book) method.

Keywords

Fairy tales, e-books, traditional method, technological method, preschoolers

References

• Ağakay, M.A. (1966). Turkish Dictionary. ANKARA. Turkish Linguistic Society Publications.
• Akyüz, A and Akbaytürk, T. (2006) The models of providing Electronic Book in Consortiums.
• Anameriç, H and Rukancı, F. (2003). The technology of E-book and it is used. Turkish Librarianship, p.147-166.
• Bežilová, V. (2019). The Effect of Storytelling on Longer Vocabulary Retention. Contemporary Research in Education and English Language Teaching, 1(4), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.33094/26410230.2019.14.57.62
• Bilkan, A.F. (2009). Fairy Tale Aesthetic. İstanbul. Timaş Publications.
• Civaroğlu, Ö. (2000). Children’s Literatüre. İstanbul: Esin Publication.
• Çılgınsınar, A.S. (2006). Making the child Open a door of Magic World. National Education Bulletin, 172.
• Day, R. (2001). Reading the Future. Popular Mechanics, 178(4) pp.82-85.
• Demirdöğen, P. (2003). The classification of the books which the children who are between 6 and 15 can read in terms of training and visuality by published National Education Publications, being studied carefully in terms of Tongue and Telling judgmentally. Master Thesis, Department of Turkish Training, Social Knowledge Institution of Seljuk University.
• Derman, S. (2002). Using the fairy tale texts in the native tongue (Turkish) teaching. Master Thesis, Social Knowledge Institution of Seljuk University.
• Diaz, P. (2003) Usability of Hypermedia Educational E-book. D-lib Magazine, 9.
• Glazer, J.I. (1986). Literature for Children. Ohio.
• Gökalp, Z. (2009). Little Magazine (Volume 18). (Prof. Dr. Şahin Filiz, Translation). Yeniden Anadolu ve Rumeli Mudafa-i Hukuk Publications.
• Gönen, M. (1989). The importance of the book and toy in terms of Child Improvement. Education and Science, 13-15.
• Gönen, M. (2005). The role of the children’s books in improving the tongue. Education Magazine in the light of Science and Wisdom.
• Görgü, A. (2006). The contribution of the fairy tales to the improvement of cognitive and Sensual. The second Children’s and Youth’s Literature Symposium. Ankara.
• Gregorio-Rodrigez, C., Llana-Diaz, L.F, and Pareja-Flores, L. F. (2002). A System to Generate Electronic Books on Programming Exercises.
• Güleç, H. (1988). Public Literature. İstanbul: Çizgi Bookshop.
• Güleryüz, H. (2003). Creative Children’s Literature. Ankara. Pegem Publications.
• Kabadayi, A., (2005). A story-based model from Turkey to foster preschool children's communicative input and performance in the process of mother tongue acquisition. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(3): 301-307.Available at: https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2005.6.3.10.
• Kabadayı, A., (2009). Investigation of the contribution of lullabies to child development areas: Konya case. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1): 276-289.
• Kabadayı, A. (2019). Contributions of the Fairy Tales to the Children on the Basis of the Teachers‟ Views. American Journal of Education and Learning, 4(2): 222-233
• Larson, E.C. (2007). A Case Study Exploring The “New Literacies” During a fifth-Grade Electronic Reading Workshop. Kansas State University: Taken from the address of http://www.krex.kstate.edu/dspace/bitsream/2097/352/1/EvaLottaLarson2007.pdf
• Megep. (2008). Child’s Improvement and Education-Turkish Language Activities in private education. Ankara.
• Oğuzkan, A.F. (2000). Children’s Literature. Ankara: State Printing House.
• Önder, I. (2010). Electronic Book Fact and the case in Turkey. Master Thesis, Department of Knowledge and Document, Social Science Institution of Ankara University. Ankara.
• Önder, I. (2011). Publishing of e-Book and Electronic Book in the World. Turkish Librarianship, p. 25(1), pp. 97-105.
• Poftak, A. (2001). Getting a read on e-books. Technology and Learning, p. 21(9).
• Sakaoğlu, S. (1973). The Gümüşhane Fairy Tales, Collection and Analysis of Text. Ankara. Sever, S. (2003). Child and Literature. Ankara. Kök Printing.
• Varış, F. (1994). Access to Education Sciences. Konya. Atlas Bookshop.
• Yavuzer, H. (2000). Children Psychology. Istanbul. Remzi Bookshop.
• Yavuzer, H. (2003). Children Psychology. İstanbul. Remzi Bookshop.
• Yüksel, M. (1987). Relations between Scool Age children’s Publications and Psycho-Social Improvements by content. Symposium Notifications of Children Publications. Ankara. General Directorate of Libraries and Publications .