A GEOGRAPHICAL PERSPECTIVE TO RELIGIONS’ APPROACH TO NATURE

Abstract

This article illustrates a geographical perspective through approaching the na-ture/culture relationship from various religions’ worldviews. Tangible changes in nature such as greenhouse gas emission, acid deposition, deforestation and ozone layer depletion could be immensely felt. Over the past few decades, these issues related to nature have received intense attention, both in academia and non-academic areas. These substantial changes directly result from the dualistic relationship between humans and non-human beings since the Enlightenment period. Therefore, this article proposes why we should consider a religious-based solution for environmental problems through considering different reli-gions’ approaches to nature. It analyses religions in three sub-categories as mon-otheist religions, Eastern religions and indigenous religions and shows how var-ious religions approach the relationship between nature, humans and culture. Consequently, it tries to contribute to human geography in general and to geog-raphies of religions, a sub-branch of human geography in particular, by under-standing the impacts of religion on the ongoing discussions of nature in human geography.

Keywords

• Religion
• Nature
• Nature/culture dualism
• Geographies of religion
• Monotheist religions
• Eastern religions
• Indigenous religions.

DİNLERİN DOĞAYA YAKLAŞIMINA COĞRAFİ BİR BAKIŞ AÇISI

Abstract

Bu makale doğa/ kültür ilişkisine çeşitli dinlerin perspektifinden yaklaşarak coğ-rafi bir bakış açısı sunmaktır. Doğadaki sera gazi salınımı, asit birikimi, orman-sızlaştırma, ozan katının incelmesi gibi değişiklikler somut bir şekilde hissedil-mektedir. Bu somut değişimler, Aydınlanma döneminden itibaren insanın insan dışı varlıklarla kurduğu dualistik ilişkinin doğal bir sonucudur. Doğa ile ilgili meseleler son birkaç on yıldır gerek akademide gerekse akademi dışı alanlarda yoğun bir ilgi görmüştür. Bu yüzden bu makale, farklı dinlerin doğa yaklaşımla-rını ele alarak doğa problemlerine din perspektifli bir çözüm önerisi getirilmesi gerektiğini önermektedir. Dinleri monoteist, Doğu dinleri ve yerli dinler olarak üç kategoride analiz edip, çeşitli dinlerin doğa, insan ve kültür ilişkisine nasıl yaklaştığını göstermektedir. Özetle bu makale, beşerî coğrafyada var olan doğa tartışmalarına din faktörünün etkisini anlamaya çalışarak genel olarak beşerî coğ-rafyaya özel olarak da beşerî coğrafyanın bir alt dalı olan dinler coğrafyasına katkı sunmaya çalışır.

Keywords

• Din
• Doğa
• Kültür-doğa düalizmi
• Dinler coğrafyası
• Monoteist dinler
• Doğu dinleri
• Yerli dinler
• Çevresel problemler

References

1. Adorno, T. W., ve Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment (Vol. 15). Verso.
2. Aḥmad, Ḫuršīd. (1976). Islam: Its meaning and message. Islamic council of Europe.
3. Alley, K. D. (2000). Separate domains: Hinduism, politics, and environ-mental pollution. Hinduism and Ecology: The Intersection of Earth, Sky, and Water, 355–387.
4. Attfield, R. (2000). Christianity and nature. A Companion to Environmen-tal Philosophy, 96–110.
5. Braun, B. (2002). The intemperate rainforest: Nature, culture, and power on Canada’s west coast. U of Minnesota Press.
6. Castree, N. (1995). The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode, 27, 12–12.
7. Castree, N. (2000). Marxism and the production of nature. Capital & Class, 24(3), 5–36.
8. Chidester, D. (2018). 1. Animism. In Religion (pp. 23–29). University of California Press.

9. Demeritt, D. (1994). Ecology, objectivity and critique in writings on na-ture and human societies. Journal of Historical Geography, 20(1), 22–37.
10. Duncan, J. (2009). Coffee, Disease, and the “Simultaneity of Stories-So-Far” in the Highlands of 19th-Century Ceylon. Spatialising Politics: Culture and Geography in Postcolonial Sri Lanka, Edited by Cathrine Brun and Tariq Jazeel, 44–71.
11. Earhart, H. B. (2004). Japanese religion: Unity and diversity.
12. Faulstich, P. (1986). Pictures of the dreaming: Aboriginal rock art of Aus-tralia. Archaeology, 39(4), 18–25.
13. Ginn, F., ve Demeritt, D. (2009). In Nature: A contested concept. Sage London.
14. Golshani, M. (2000). Islam and the sciences of nature: Some fundamental questions. Islamic Studies, 39(4), 597–611.
15. Gordon, D. M., ve Krech III, S. (2012). Indigenous knowledge and the environment in Africa and North America. Ohio University Press.
16. Haraway, D. (2013). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
17. Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Harvey, D. J., Merry, A. H., Royle, L., Campbell, M. P., ve Rudd, P. M. (1996). Justice, nature ve the geography of difference.
19. Hiebert, T. (1996). The Yahwist’s landscape: Nature and religion in early Israel. Oxford University Press.
20. Hope, M., ve Young, J. (1994). Islam and ecology. CrossCurrents, 180–192.
21. Hussey, C. (2019). The picturesque: Studies in a point of view. Routledge.
22. Kiple, K. F. (2007). A movable feast: Ten millennia of food globalization. Cambridge University Press.
23. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Harvard University Press.
24. Madera, L. M. (2009). Visions of Christ in the Amazon: The gospel ac-cording to ayahuasca and Santo Daime. Journal for the Study of Religion, Na-ture ve Culture, 3(1).
25. Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions: Or, how Europe-an universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism. University of Chi-cago Press.
26. Merrick, H. (2017). Naturecultures and feminist materialism. In Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment (pp. 101–114). Routledge.
27. Morrissey, J., Nally, D., Strohmayer, U., ve Whelan, Y. (2014). Key con-cepts in historical geography. Sage.
28. Mulcock, J. (2001). Ethnography in awkward spaces: An anthropology of cultural borrowing. Practicing Anthropology, 23(1), 38–42.
29. Narayanan, V. (1997). ‘ One Tree Is Equal to Ten Sons’: Hindu Respons-es to the Problems of Ecology, Population, and Consumption. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 65(2), 291–332.
30. Narayanan, V. (2018). Hinduism. In Her Voice, Her Faith (pp. 11–57). Routledge.
31. Nasr, S. H. (1990). Islam and the environmental crisis. Islamic Quarterly, 34(4), 217.
32. Otim, J. J. (1992). The taproot of environmental and development crisis in Africa. ACLCA.
33. Ouis, S. P. (1998). Islamic Ecotheology Based On The Qur’ān. Islamic Studies, 37(2), 151–181.
34. Poceski, M. (2007). Ordinary mind as the way: The Hongzhou School and the growth of Chan Buddhism. Oxford University Press.
35. Poceski, M. (2014). Buddhism in Chinese History. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism, 40–62.
36. Rose, D. B. (1988). Exploring an Aboriginal land ethic. Meanjin, 47(3), 378–387.
37. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism: Western concepts of the Orient. New York: Pantheon.
38. Sarpong, P. K. (1989). African Traditional Religion and Peace (with Spe-cial Reference to Ashanti) in Peace and Religions. Studia Missionalia, 38, 351–370.
39. Schmidt, A. (1974). The concept of nature in Marx. Verso Trade.
40. Schmithausen, L. (1997). The early Buddhist tradition and ecological eth-ics. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 4(1), 1–74.
41. Smith, N. (2010). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the produc-tion of space. University of Georgia Press.
42. Sponsel, L. E. (1986). Amazon ecology and adaptation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15(1), 67–97.
43. Stump, R. W. (2008). The geography of religion: Faith, place, and space. Rowman ve Littlefield Publishers.
44. Tang, W. (2016). Religion and Society in China and Taiwan. In Chinese Political Culture (pp. 314–335). Routledge.
45. Toynbee, A. J., ve Ikeda, D. (1976). The Toynbee-Ikeda Dialogue Man Himself Must Choose.
46. Trigger, D., ve Mulcock, J. (2005). Forests as Spiritually Significant Plac-es: Nature, Culture andBelonging ‘in Australia. The Australian Journal of An-thropology, 16(3), 306–320.
47. Tucker, M. E., ve Berthrong, J. (1998). Confucianism and ecology. Har-vard University.
48. Tutua-Nathan, T. (1992). Maori tribal rights to ownership and control: The geothermal resource in New Zealand. Applied Geography, 12(2), 192–198.
49. Weber, M., ve Kalberg, S. (2013). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge.
50. Williams, R. (1980). Problems in materialism and culture: Selected es-says. Verso.
51. Wilson, A. (1991). The culture of nature: North American landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez. Between the lines.