Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Uluslararası Göçün Yerelde Çok Düzeyli Yönetişimi: Sultanbeyli Belediyesi Örneği

Abstract

Birleşmiş Milletler 2030 Gündemi kapsamında bir yol haritası sunan Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları’nın (SKA) temelindeki Kimseyi Geride Bırakma (Leave No One Behind) ilkesi son yılların en önemli kamu politika alanlarından biri olan göç yönetişiminin de bütüncül ve kapsayıcı bir nitelikte olması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir. Bu çalışma sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve göç ilişkisinin daha iyi anlaşılması ve bu bağlamda yerel yönetimlerin atabilecekleri adımlara yönelik bir iyi uygulama örneği sunan İstanbul Sultanbeyli Belediyesini incelemektedir. Çalışmada öncelikle çok düzeyli göç yönetişimi açısından Küresel Amaçlar kapsamında yerel yönetimleri ilgilendiren maddeler ele alınmaktadır. Bu açıdan belediyeler kapsamlı işbirliği, yerelleşme ve uyum konularında SKA’ların yerel düzeyde başarıya ulaşması ve kalkınmaya duyarlı göç politikaları geliştirilmesinde önemli birer aktör olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Nitel araştırma bulgularına dayanan ve Sultanbeyli Belediyesinin sunduğu hizmetleri SKA’lar ve bu amaçların yerine getirilmesi yönünde belirlenen göstergeler çerçevesinde değerlendiren çalışmamız, belediyenin benimsediği “kalkınma odaklı işbirliği” yaklaşımının Türkiye’de geliştirilebilecek çok düzeyli göç yönetişimi modeline örnek olabilecek nitelikte olduğunu savunmaktadır.

Keywords

• göç yönetişimi
• sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları
• yerel yönetimler
• çok düzeyli yönetişim
• göçmen

Supporting Institution

Yazarlar bu çalışma için herhangi bir finansal destek alınmadığını beyan etmiştir.

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmada etik ilke ve standartlara uyulduğu beyan edilmiştir. Bu çalışma ve çalışmada kullanılacak veri toplama araçları ve yöntemlerine ilişkin bilgiler Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Etik Kurulu tarafından 22.12.2021 tarihinde 2021.12 numaralı toplantıda incelenmiştir ve verdiği karara göre etiğe aykırı herhangi bir bulguya rastlanmamıştır.

Multi-Level Local Governance of International Migration for Sustainable Development: The Case of Sultanbeyli Municipality

Abstract

The central “leave no one behind” principle of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) points out that governance of migration, one of the most critical public policy field of recent years, should also be holistic and inclusive, encompassing all groups. This study examines Istanbul Sultanbeyli Municipality with the purpose of unpacking a good practice example for a better understanding of the migration-sustainable development nexus and the steps local governments can take in this context. The study initially discusses the SDGs and relevant targets that concern local governments in terms of multi-level migration governance. In this respect, municipalities emerge as critical actors for the success of SDGs at the local level and the formulation of development-sensitive migration policies through fostering cooperation, localization and adaptation. Based on qualitative research findings and the assessment of Sultanbeyli Municipality’s services within the framework of SDGs, we argue that the “development-oriented cooperation” approach adopted by the municipality has the potential to set an example for a multi-level migration governance model that can be further developed in Türkiye.

Keywords

• migration governance
• sustainable development goals
• local governments
• multi-level governance
• migrant

References

1. Açıkgöz, M. (2021). Göç, kentleşme ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları: Yerelleştirme için bir rehber. RESLOG, Marmara Belediyeler Birliği.
2. Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S., & Seyfang, G. (2003). Governance for sustainability: Towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decisionmaking. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(6), 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35289
3. Ahouga, Y. (2018). The local turn in migration management: The IOM and the engagement of local authorities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(9), 1523–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1368371
4. Alexander, M. (2003). Local policies toward migrants as an expression of Host-Stranger relations: A proposed typology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(3), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830305610
5. Barderi, D. de T. (2018). Antirumours handbook 2018. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/anti-rumours-handbook-a-standardised-methodology-for-cities-2018-/168077351c
6. Council of Europe. (2021). Anti-rumours. https://www.coe.int/en/web/interculturalcities/anti-rumours
7. Dünya Yerel Yönetim Demokrasi Akademisi Vakfı [WALD]. (2021). IV. Mülteciler alanında belediyeler arası koordinasyon toplantısı, kapsayıcılık: Ortak sorunlar, ortak çözümler. https://www.wald.org.tr/tr/bizden-haberler/iv-multeciler-alaninda-belediyeler-arasi-koordinasyon-toplantisi--1536
8. Euro Cities. (2018, October). Cities and migrants III: Implementing the integrating cities charter. https://integratingcities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/3rd_Integrating_Cities_Report_October_2018_FINAL.pdf

9. European Commission. (2019). INTED-Integration Through Dialogue and Education. https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/integration-practice/inted-integration-through-dialogue-and-education_en
10. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Siragusa, A., Stamos, I., Bertozzi, C., & Proietti, P. (2022). European handbook for SDG voluntary local reviews: 2022 edition. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/355330
11. European Committee for Social Cohesion [CDCS]. (2004). A new strategy for Social Cohesion: Revised strategy for Social Cohesion. 1–28. https://www.coe.int/t/dg3/socialpolicies/socialcohesiondev/source/RevisedStrategy_en.pdf
12. Global Compact for Migration. (2022). UN Refugees and Migrants. https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/migration-compact
13. Global Compact for Migration. (2018, July 11). Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (Final Draft). https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/sites/default/files/180711_final_draft_0.pdf
14. Global Migration Group. (2013). Exploitation and abuse of international migrants, particularly those in an irregular situation: A human rights approach [Thematic Paper]. https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/2013/2013_GMG_Thematic_Paper.pdf
15. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649
16. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G., & Schakel, A. (2019). Multilevel governance. https://hooghe.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/11492/2020/11/2020_hooghe-marks-schakel_multilevel-governance_reduced-size-Caramani.pdf
17. Human Rights Watch. (2015, November 08). When I picture my future, I see nothing: Barriers to education for Syrian Refugee children in Turkey. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/11/08/when-i-picture-my-future-i-see-nothing/barriers-education-syrian-refugee-children
18. International Organization for Migration [IOM]. (2018). Migration and the 2030 Agenda: A guide for practitioners. https://publications.iom.int/books/migration-and-2030-agenda-guide-practitioners
19. International Organization for Migration & Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü. (2019, May-July). Baseline assessment in Istanbul province analysis report. https://dtm.iom.int/system/tdf/reports/IST_Baseline_Assessment_Phase5_ENG_29012020.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=7733
20. Jeffery, C. (2000). Sub-national mobilization and European Integration: Does it make any difference? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00206
21. Jessop, B. (2000). The Crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 323–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00251
22. Jordan, A. (2001) The European Union: An evolving system of multi-level governance … or government? Policy and Politics, 29(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573012501305
23. Küresel Amaçlar. (2015). 4 Nitelikli Eğitim. Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Küresel Amaçlar. https://www.kureselamaclar.org/amaclar/nitelikli-egitim
24. Leibfried, S., & Pierson, P. (1995). European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration. Brookings Institution.
25. Memişoğlu, F., & Yavçan, B. (2022). Beyond ideology - a comparative analysis of how local governance can expand national integration policy: The case of Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(3), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1819780
26. Memişoğlu, F., & Yiğit, C. (2019). Uluslararası göç ve kalkınma: Teori ve güncel meseleler. Yıldız Social Science Review. 5(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.595809
27. Mülteciler Derneği. (2023a). Hakkımızda. https://multeciler.org.tr/hakkimizda
28. Mülteciler Derneği. (2023b). Projelerimiz. https://multeciler.org.tr/projelerimiz
29. Mülteciler Derneği. (2023c). Kadın Konuk Evi. https://multeciler.org.tr/kadin-konuk-evi
30. Mülteciler Derneği. (2023d). Çogem Anaokulu. https://multeciler.org.tr/multeciler-anaokulu
31. Mülteciler Derneği. (2023e). Eğitim ve Mentörlük Birimi. https://multeciler.org.tr/egitim-ve-mentorluk-birimi
32. Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149.
33. Özipek, B. B. (2019). Sultanbeyli Belediyesi örneğinde başarılı göç yönetişimi. Sağlık Düşüncesi ve Tıp Kültürü Platformu. https://www.sdplatform.com/Dergi/1237/Sultanbeyli-Belediyesi-orneginde-basarili-goc-yonetisimi.aspx
34. Penninx, R. (2009, November). Decentralising integration policies: Managing migration in cities, regions and localities (Policy Network Paper). http://integratingcities2012.eu/documents/(2009%20-%20Penninx)%20Decentralising%20integration%20policies.pdf
35. Peters, G. B., & Pierre, J. (2004). Multi-level governance and democracy: A faustian bargin? In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level Governance (pp. 75–90). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199259259.003.0005
36. Rosenau, J. (1997). Along the domestic–foreign frontier: Exploring governance in a turbulent world. Cambridge University Press.
37. Scholten, P., & Penninx, R. (2016). The multilevel governance of migration and integration. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors (pp. 91–108). Springer.
38. Spindelegger, M. (2020, December 18). A call to recognize local governments in migration governance. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/sponsored-content/a-call-to-recognize-local-authorities-in-migration-governance
39. Sultanbeyli Belediyesi. (2021, Aralık). Sultanbeyli 2030 Gündemi: Kimseyi Geride Bırakma. Sultanbeyli Gönüllü Yerel Değerlendirme Raporu. https://www.sultanbeyli.bel.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2021-sultanbeyli-gonullu-yerel-degerlendirme-raporu-vlr.pdf
40. United Cities and Local Governments. (2019). The localization of the global agendas: How local action is transforming territories and communities (Fifth Global Report on Decentralization and Local Democracy, Gold V 2019). UCLG. https://www.gold.uclg.org/sites/default/files/ENG-GOLD-V-2020.pdf
41. United Cities and Local Governments. (2020). The localization of the global agendas: How local action is transforming territories and communities (Fifth Global Report on Decentralization and Local Democracy: Executive Summary). UCLG. https://www.gold.uclg.org/sites/default/files/ENG-Executive-Summary-2020.pdf
42. United Nations. (2016, February 23). The sustainable development goals and migrants/migration, regarding the UN 2030 sustainable development agenda: Relevant SDGs, implementation actions, realization measurement indicators and rationals for inclusion. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/events/coordination/14/documents/backgrounddocs/GMPA_14CM.pdf
43. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [DESA]. (2014a). Around 2.5 billion more people will be living in cities by 2050, projects new UN report. https://www.un.org/en/desa/around-25-billion-more-people-will-be-living-cities-2050-projects-new-un-report
44. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [DESA]. (2014b, July 10). 2014 revision of the World Urbanization Prospects. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/2014-revision-world-urbanization-prospects.html
45. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [DESA]. (2023a). Goals 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal8
46. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [DESA]. (2023b). 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/goal-10
47. United Nations General Assembly. (2014, December 04). The road to dignity by 2030: Ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet (Synthesis report of the Secretary-General on the post-2015 Agenda). https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/reports/SG_Synthesis_Report_Road_to_Dignity_by_2030.pdf
48. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. [UNHCR]. (2019, July). Working towards durable solutions [Fact Sheet]. UNHCR TURKEY. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2019/10/7.5-UNHCR-Turkey-Working-towards-Durable-Solutions-Fact-Sheet-July-2019-FINALV22.pdf
49. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. [UNHCR]. (2023). Trafficing in persons. https://www.unhcr.org/us/what-we-do/safeguard-human-rights/asylum-and-migration/trafficking-persons
50. Vogler, M., & Rotte, R. (2000). The effects of development on migration: Theoretical issues and new empirical evidence. Journal of Population Economics, 13(3), 485–508.
51. Zincone, G., & Caponio, T. (2006). The multilevel governance of migration. In R. Penninx, M. Berger and K. Kraal (Eds.), The dynamics of international migration andsettlement in Europe (pp. 269–304). IMISCOE Joint Studies. Amsterdam University Press.