A Multidimensional Analysis of Corporate Reputation Perceptions among the Most Beloved Brands in Türkiye

Year 2026, Issue: 72, 162 - 185, 24.03.2026

Güliz Müge Akpınar

https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1836688

https://izlik.org/JA53UB85LH

Abstract

This study comparatively examines corporate reputation perceptions of Migros, Trendyol, and Yemeksepeti—three brands randomly selected from among the companies featured in MediaCat’s Lovemarks research, which identifies the most favored and emotionally resonant brands in Türkiye. The study investigates how corporate reputation perceptions differ among these brands across four dimensions—social responsibility, vision and leadership, product and service quality, and financial performance—and explores the extent to which consumer behaviors, including brand usage frequency and spending level, influence these perceptions. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire based on the Corporate Reputation Quotient (RQ) scale developed by Fombrun, Gardberg, and Sever (2000). The sample comprised individuals aged 18 and older who had logged into the Migros, Trendyol, or Yemeksepeti mobile application at least once in the preceding month and had used it for shopping or service purposes. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were employed. Following a screening process in which one ineligible response was removed, analyses were conducted on a final sample of 555 participants. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0, with descriptive statistics, ANOVA, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis applied. The findings reveal that corporate reputation perceptions differ significantly even among the most favored brands. Trendyol received more favorable evaluations on the vision and leadership and product and service quality dimensions, while Migros distinguished itself on the social responsibility dimension. Brand usage frequency was positively associated with stronger overall corporate reputation perceptions. Although spending level showed no significant relationship with overall corporate reputation, it was positively associated with perceptions of financial performance.

Keywords

Corporate Reputation , Digital Consumer Experience , Brand Usage Frequency , Consumer Behavior , Corporate Communication

Türkiye’nin En Sevilen Markalarında Kurumsal İtibar Algılarının Çok Boyutlu Analizi

https://izlik.org/JA53UB85LH

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de tüketicilerin en sevdiği ve duygusal bağ kurduğu markaları belirleyen MediaCat tarafından yayımlanan Lovemarks araştırmalarında yer alan markalar arasından kura yöntemiyle rastgele seçilen Migros, Trendyol ve Yemeksepeti’ne yönelik kurumsal itibar algılarını karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektedir. Araştırmanın amacı, sevilen markalar arasında kurumsal itibar algısının sosyal sorumluluk, vizyon ve liderlik, ürün ve hizmet kalitesi ile finansal performans boyutlarında nasıl farklılaştığını ortaya koymak ve ayrıca marka kullanım sıklığı ile kişisel harcama düzeyi gibi tüketici davranışlarının itibar algısı üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın verileri, Fombrun, Gardberg ve Sever (2000) tarafından geliştirilen Kurumsal İtibar Katsayısı (RQ) ölçeği temel alınarak hazırlanan anket formu aracılığıyla, son bir ay içinde Migros, Trendyol ve Yemeksepeti mobil uygulamalarına en az bir kez giriş yaparak bu uygulamaları alışveriş veya hizmet amacıyla kullanan 18 yaş ve üzeri tüketicilerden amaçlı ve kartopu örnekleme yöntemleriyle toplanmıştır. Ön değerlendirme sonrasında uygun olmayan bir katılımcı çıkarılmış ve analizler 555 kişilik nihai örneklem üzerinden yürütülmüştür. Veriler SPSS 26.0 programı ile analiz edilmiş, betimleyici istatistiklere ek olarak ANOVA, korelasyon ve çoklu regresyon analizleri uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, sevilen markalar arasında dahi itibar boyutlarının anlamlı biçimde farklılaştığını göstermektedir. Trendyol’un özellikle vizyon ve liderlik ile ürün ve hizmet kalitesi boyutlarında daha olumlu değerlendirildiği, Migros’un ise sosyal sorumluluk boyutunda öne çıktığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca marka kullanım sıklığının genel kurumsal itibar algısını anlamlı biçimde güçlendirdiği tespit edilmiştir. Buna karşın kişisel harcama düzeyi ile genel kurumsal itibar algısı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamış, ancak harcama düzeyinin markanın finansal performans algısıyla pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Kurumsal İtibar , Dijital Tüketici Deneyimi , Marka Kullanım Sıklığı , Tüketici Davranışı , Kurumsal İletişim

References

• Alnıaçık, E. (2011). Tüketici temelli kurumsal itibarın ölçümü: Deneysel bir çalışma. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 223–239.
• Alnıaçık, Ü., Alnıaçık, E., & Genç, N. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kurumsal itibar algısı: Bir alan araştırması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 33–46.
• Anselmsson, J., & Johansson, U. (2014). A two‐dimensional framework for understanding consumer attitudes toward corporate brand associations. Corporate Reputation Review, 17(2), 115–131.
• Aula, P., & Mantere, S. (2013). Strategic reputation management. Routledge.
• Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (1999). Corporate identity and corporate communications: Creating strategic advantage. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 171–177.
• Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26–38.
• Bartikowski, B., & Walsh, G. (2011). Investigating mediators between corporate reputation and customer citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 39–44.
• Berens, G., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Corporate associations in the academic literature: Three main streams of thought. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(2), 161–178.
• Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
• Caruana, A., & Ewing, M. T. (2010). How corporate reputation, quality, and value influence online loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1103–1110.
• Christodoulides, G., Michaelidou, N., & Siamagka, N. T. (2019). Measuring perceived brand authenticity: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 100, 302–313.
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10(2), 123–137.
• Cravens, K. S., & Oliver, E. G. (2006). Employees: The key link to corporate reputation management. Business Horizons, 49(4), 293–302.
• Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.
• Eberl, M., & Schwaiger, M. (2005). Corporate reputation: Disentangling the effects on financial performance. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8), 838–854.
• Ergen, A. (2019). Kurumsal finansal sağlamlık ve tüketici güveni: Türkiye örneği. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 11(22), 112–129.
• Fetscherin, M. (2019). CEOs and consumer brand relationships: An empirical examination of the CEO–brand image link. Journal of Business Research, 101, 445–458.
• Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press.
• Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation Quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255.
• Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. FT Press.
• Fournier, S., & Alvarez, C. (2012). Brands as relationship partners: Warmth, competence, and in-between. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 177–185.
• Geçikli, F., Erciş, M. S., & Okumuş, M. (2016). Kurumsal itibarın bileşenleri ve parametreleri üzerine deneysel bir çalışma: Türkiye’nin öncü kurumlarından biri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(4), 1549–1562.
• Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R., & Goldsmith, E. B. (2015). Consumer characteristics influencing the effectiveness of comparative price advertising. Business Research, 68(3), 602–610.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2001). Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand? Harvard Business Review, 79(2), 128–134.
• Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2017). Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance. Journal of Brand Management, 21(9), 704–717.
• Helm, S. (2007). The role of corporate reputation in determining investor satisfaction and loyalty. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(1), 22–37.
• Kadıbeşegil, S. (2006). İtibar yönetimi. MediaCat Yayınları.
• Keller, K. L. (2020). Strategic brand management (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Kim, H., & Lennon, S. J. (2013). Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers’ emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(1), 33–56.
• Kim, S., & Ferguson, M. A. (2019). Are high-fit CSR programs always better? Effects of corporate reputation and CSR fit on consumer responses. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 439–459.
• Klaus, P., & Maklan, S. (2013). Towards a better measure of customer experience. International Journal of Market Research, 55(2), 227–246.
• Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203–217.
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
• Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 153–184.
• MediaCat. (2024). MediaCat Lovemarks 2024: Tüm liste. https://mediacat.com/mediacat-lovemarks-2024-tum-liste/
• Men, L. R., & Jiang, H. (2016). Cultivating quality employee–organization relationships: The interplay among internal reputation, workplace communication, and engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(2), 118–135.
• Men, L. R., & Stacks, D. (2013). The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation. Journal of Communication Management, 17(2), 171–192.
• Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Raithel, S., & Schwaiger, M. (2015). The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 945–956.
• Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033–1049.
• Roberts, K. (2005). Lovemarks: The future beyond brands. PowerHouse Books.
• Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.
• Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.
• Theng So, J., Parsons, A. G., & Yap, S.-F. (2013). Corporate branding, emotional attachment and brand loyalty: The case of luxury fashion branding. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(4), 403–423.
• Turban, D. B., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 733–751.
• Veloutsou, C., & Moutinho, L. (2009). Brand relationships through brand reputation and brand tribalism. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 314–322.
• Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357–387.
• Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007). Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 127–143.
• Wartick, S. (2002). Measuring corporate reputation: Definition and data. Business & Society, 41(4), 371–392.
• Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm(7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.