Politikada Yeni Ruhban Sınıfı: Siyasa ve İkna Uzmanları Olarak Politik Profesyoneller

Year 2016, Issue: 42, 173 - 190, 22.07.2016

Fatih Keskin

Abstract

Profesyonellik ve profesyoneller uzun zamandır farklı disiplinlerin ilgisini çekmiştir. Günümüzde de modern demokrasilerin ve politika biliminin en önemli etoslarından biridir. Politik alanda ilk kez Max Weber tarafından meslekten politikacı tipini tanımlamak üzere kullanılmıştır. Bu ilk dönem profesyonellere, 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren ekonomik alanda edindikleri deneyimleri politikaya uyarlayan, pazarlama stratejisine denk düşen bir politika kavrayışını yaygınlaştıran yeni türden profesyoneller eklenmiştir. Genel olarak politika bilimi profesyonelleri, politik kararların ve uygulamaların meşruluğunun seçimler dışındaki ikinci kaynağı saymış, iki ana paradigma etrafında tartışmıştır. Çoğulculuk egemen yaklaşım olma özelliğini sürdürse de, politik profesyonellerin incelenmesi konusunda eleştirel kuram daha doğru bir çözümleme çerçevesi sunmaktadır.

Keywords

Profesyonellik, Politik Profesyoneller, Politik Partilerin Krizi, Medyatikleşme, Güncellenmiş Teknokrasi Kuramı

New Clerical Class in the Politics: Political Professionals as Experts of Policy and Persuasion

Abstract

Professionalism and professionals attracted the attention of various disciplines for a long time. They are also one of the most important ethos of modern democracies and political science. In the political field, the term of professionals was first used by Max Weber to define the type of politician by profession. Since the second half of the 20th century, this first period notion of professionals embraced a new type of professionals who had adapted their experiences which gained in the economic field to the politics and had spreaded a new understanding of politics which is equivalent to marketing strategy. In general, political science considered the professionals as the second source of political decisions and practices following the elections. Moreover, political science discussed this issue around two main paradigms. Even if the Pluralism remains the dominant approach, critical theory offers a more accurate analysis framework in the study of political professionals.

Keywords

Professionalism, Political Professionals, The Crises of the Political Parties, Mediatization, Updated Technocracy Theory

References

• Abbott, A. (1988), The System of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago Press.
• Alisch, L. Michael, Baumert, J. ve Beck, K. (Hg.) (1990), Professionswissen und Professionalisierung, Technische Universität, Braunschweig.
• Altheide, D. L.- Snow, R.P. (1988), “Toward a theory of mediation”, A. Anderson, James (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 11, CA, Newbury Park, s. 194-223.
• Beyme, K. von (1992), “Der Begriff der politischen Klasse-Eine neue Dimension der Elitenforschung?”, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol 33, s. 4-32.
• Bourdieu, P. (2001), Das politische Feld. Zur Kritik der politischen Vernunft, UVK, Konstanz.
• Bourdieu, P. ve Wacquant, L. (2006), Reflexive Anthropologie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
• Burke, E. (1967), Betrachtungen über die französische Revolution, Übers. v. Friedrich Gentz [1790], Frankfurt a. M.
• Borchert, J. (2003), Die Professionalisierung der Politik, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/ Main.
• Brown, M.B.- Lentsch, J. ve Weingart, P. (2006), Politikberatung und Parlament, Verlag Barbara Budrich, Opladen.
• Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. ve Farr, M. J. (Ed.) (1988), The Nature of Expertise, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
• Chomsky, N. (1971), American Power and the New Mandarins, Vintage, New York.
• Dalton, R. J. (1996), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
• Dingwall, P. ve Lewis, P. (Ed.) (1983), The Sociology of Professions, Basingstoke/ London.
• Domhoff, W. G. (1987), “Where Do Government Experts Come From?”, Domhoff, William- Dye, Thomas (Ed.), Power Elites and Organizations, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, s. 189-200.
• Dye, T. (1987), “Organizing for Policy Planning: The View from the Brookings Institution”, Domhoff, William- Dye, Thomas (Ed.), Power Elites and Organizations, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, s. 169-188.
• Ericsson, K. A. ve Smith, J. (Ed.) (1991), Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
• Field, G. L. ve Higley, J. (1973), Elites and Non-Elites: The possibilities and their Side Effects, MA: Warner Modular Publications, Andover.
• Fischer, F. (1996), Technocracy and Politics of Expertise, Sage Publications, London.
• Freidson, E. (1986), Professional Powers. A Study of the Instirutionalization of Formal Knowledge, Chicago/London.
• Gehne, D. H. ve Spier, T. (2010), Krise oder Wandel der Parteiendemokratie, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
• Golsch, L. (1998), Die politische Klasse im Parlament, Nomos Verlag, Baden- Baden.
• Goode, W. J. (1957), “Community within a community: The professions”, American Sociological Review, 22, s. 194-200.
• Gouldner, A. W. (1980), Die Intelligenz als neue Klasse, Frankfurt am Main/New York.
• Habermas, J. (1997). Kamusallığın Yapısal Dönüşümü, çev. Tanıl Bora-Mithat Sancar, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Hitzler, R. (1994), “Wissen und Wesen des Experten”, Hitzler, Ronald- Honer, Anne- Mäder, Christoph (Hg.), Expertenwissen, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, s. 13-30.
• Holtz-Bacha, C. (2007), “Professionalisation of politics in Germany”, Mancini, P.- Negrine, R.- Holtz-Bacha, C.- Papathanassopoulos, S. (Ed.), The professionalisation of political communication, Intellect Books, Bristol, Chicago, s. 63-79.
• Hughes, E. C. (1965), “Professions”, Kenneth, S. L. (Ed.), The professions in America, Houghton, Boston Mifflin, s. 1-14.
• Johnson, T. (1977), “The professions in the class structure”, Scase, R. (Ed.), Industrial society, George Allen & Unwin, London, s. 93-108.
• Kepplinger, H. M. (1999), “Die Mediatisierung der Politik”, Wilke, Jürgen (Hg.), Massenmedien und Zeitgeschichte, UVK Medien, Konstanz, s. 55-63.
• Keskin, F. (2011), Politik Profesyoneller ve Uzmanlar, DeKi Yayınevi, Ankara.
• Kirchheimer, O. (1965), “Der Wandel des westeuropäischen Parteiensystems”, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 6/1, s. 20-41.
• Klingemann, H.- Stöss, D. R. ve Wessels, B. (Hrsg.) (1991), Politische Klasse und politische Institutionen, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
• Köker, E. (1998), Politikanın İletişimi İletişimin Politikası, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.
• Lapp, R. E. (1965), The new priesthood: The scientific elite and the usesof power, Harper&Row, New York.
• Larson, M. S. (1977), The rise of professionalism, University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Luhmann, N. (1996), Die Realität der Massenmedien, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
• Mancini, P. (2009), “ Politik Profesyonellikte Yeni Ufuklar”, Keskin, Fatih- Özdemir, Pınar (der.), Halkla İlişkiler Üzerine, Dipnot Yayınları, Ankara, s. 279-302.
• Mayhew, L. H. (1997), The New Public, Cambridge University Press.
• Mazzoleni, G.- Schulz, W. (1999), “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy?”, Political Communication,16, s. 247-261.
• Mazzoleni, G. ve Schulz, W. (2009), “ Politikanın Medyatikleşmesi: Demokrasiye Bir Meydan Okuyuş Mu?”, Keskin, Fatih- Özdemir, Pınar (der.), Halka İlişkiler Üzerine, Dipnot Yayınları, Ankara, s. 253-279.
• Mieg, H. A. ve Pfadenhauer, M. (Hg.) (2003), Professionelle Leistung – Professional Performance, UVK, Konstanz. Mills, C. W. (1974), İktidar Seçkinleri, (Çev. Ünsal Oskay), Bilgi Yayınevi, Ankara.
• Mintzel,A.(1984),Die Volkspartei, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
• Mosca, G. (1939), The Ruling Class, McGraw Hill, New York.
• Panebianco, A. (1988), Political Parties: Organization and Power, Cambridge Studies in Modern Political Economies.
• Papathanassopoulos, S.- Negrine, R.- Mancini, P. ve Holtz-Bacha, C. (der.) (2007), The Professionalisation of Political Communication, Intellect, Bristol.
• Parsons, T. (1951), The social system, Free Press, New York.
• Parsons, T. (1968), “Professions”, L. Sills, David (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Volume 12, The Free Press, New York, s. 536-547.
• Patzelt, W. J. (2014), Abgeordnete und ihr Beruf: Von wahren Vorurteilen und falschen Vorverurteilungen, Springer VS, Wiesbaden.
• Pfadenhauer, M. (2003), Professionalität, Leske+Budrich, Opladen.
• Pfadenhauer, M. (Hg.) (2005), Professionelles Handeln,VS, Wiesbaden.
• Rattner,J.veDanzer,G.(2007), Politik und Psychoanalyse, Königshausen&Neumann, Würzburg.
• Roqueplo, P. (1995), “Scientific Expertise among Political Powers, Administrations and Public Opinion”, Science and Public Policy, 22/3, s. 175-183.
• Sarcinelli, U. (1998), “Mediatisierung”, Jarren, Otfried – Sarcinelli, Ulrich- Saxer, Ulrich (Hg.), Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft. Ein Handbuch mit Lexikonteil, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, Wiesbaden, s. 678-679.
• Sauer, M. (2000), Gesellschaftliche Steuerungschancen durch Elitenintegration?, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.
• Schmidt, M. G. (1989), “Allerweltsparteien und Verfall der Opposition - Ein Beitrag zu Kirchheimers Analysen westeuropäischer Parteiensysteme”, Luthardt, Wolfgang- Söllner, Alfons (Hg.), Verfassungsstaat, Souveränität, Pluralismus. Otto Kirchheimer zum Gedächtnis, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, s. 173-181.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1950), Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie, 2. erw. Aufl., Bern.
• Schüttemeyer, S. S. (1998), Fraktionen im Deutschen Bundestag. Empirische Befunde und theoretische Folgerungen, Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden.
• Schütz, A. ve Luckmann, T. (1979), Strukturen der Lebenswelt, Band 1, Frankfurt a.M.
• Şahan, S. (2013), Seçim Kampanyalarında Profesyonelleşme: Türkiye’de Seçim Kampanya Uzmanları ve Lider Danışmanları, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Halkla İlişkiler ve Tanıtım Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Tenscher, J. (2003), Professionalisierung der Politikvermittlung? Politikvermittlungsexperten im Spannungsfeld von Politik und Massenmedien, Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden.
• Tokgöz, O. (2008), Siyasal İletişimi Anlamak, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
• Vowe, G. (2006), “Mediatisierung der Politik? Ein theoretischer Ansatz auf dem Prüfstand”, Publizistik, 51, s. 437-455.
• Wagner, Peter (1990), Sozialwissenschaften und Staat, Campus, Frankfurt/Main.
• Weber, M. (2006), Sosyoloji Yazıları, (Çev. Taha Parla), 8. Baskı, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Wessels, B. (1992), “Zum Begriff der ‘politischen Klasse’”, GMH, 9/92, s. 541- 549.