Mutluluk Ekonomisi Üzerine Ölçek Geliştirme ve Uygulama

Year 2023, , 117 - 136, 29.10.2023

Mehmet Polat

https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1347644

Abstract

Bu çalışma, iki temel amaç üzerine bina edilmiştir. Birincisi, mutluluk ekonomisi bağlamında bir mutluluk ölçeği geliştirmektir. İkincisi, güvenirliği ve uygulanabilirliği ispatlanan mutluluk ölçeğini belirlenen modeller çerçevesinde test etmektir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın ilk aşamasında, ölçek geliştirme aşamaları tek tek takip edilerek açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Analizler neticesinde güven, beklenti, ekonomik kazanç ve yaşam standardı (EKYS) ve öznel iyi oluş (ÖİO) olmak üzere dört faktör elde edilmiştir. İkinci aşamada ise geliştirilen mutluluk ölçeği, Çoklu Grup Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (ÇGYEM) kullanılarak belirlenen iki model kapsamında değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın her iki modelinin neredeyse tüm grup sonuçlarında, bireylerin güven, beklenti ve EKYS düzeylerinin önemli düzeyde ÖİO üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı etkiye sahip olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Özellikle erkeklerin güven ve EKYS düzeylerinin beklentiler üzerinden ÖİO düzeyini önemli düzeyde etkilediği görülmüştür. Çıkan sonuçlara göre araştırma modellerinde yer alan aracı ve bağımsız değişkenlerin yeterli olduğu söylenebilir. Ayrıca bireylerin güven, ekonomik kazanç ve yaşam standartlarının gelecekle ilgili beklentilerini önemli düzeyde etkilediği ve beklentilerinin de mutluluk üzerinde önemli düzeyde belirleyici olduğu sonucu ortaya çıkmaktadır.

Keywords

Mutluluk Ekonomisi, Öznel İyi Oluş, Çoklu Grup Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

Supporting Institution

Araştırmacı, kendi imkanları ile bu çalışmayı yapmıştır.

Scale Development and Application on the Economics of Happiness

Abstract

This study is built on two main aims. The first is to develop a happiness scale in the context of happiness economics. The second is to test the happiness scale, which reliability and applicability have been proven, within the framework of the determined models. In this context, in the first stage of the study, explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted by following the scale development stages one by one. As a result of the analyses, four factors were obtained: trust, expectation, economic earnings and standard of living (EESL), and subjective well-being (SWB). In the second stage, the developed happiness scale was analyzed within the scope of two models determined using the Multi-group Structural Equation Modeling (MSEM). In almost all group results of both study models, it was observed that individuals' trust, expectation, and EESL levels had a significant positive and significant effect on SWB. In particular, it was observed that men's trust and EESL levels significantly affected the level of SWB through expectations. According to the results, it can be said that the mediator and independent variables in the research models are sufficient. In addition, it is concluded that individuals' trust, economic earnings, and living standards significantly affect their expectations about the future, and their expectations are also significant determinants of happiness.

Keywords

Happiness Economics, Subjective Well-Being, Multi-group Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Albayrak, G. (2022). Mutluluk ekonomisi ve Türkiye. Turkish Business Journal, 3(5), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.51727/tbj.1122508
• Alesina, A., Di Tella, R. ve MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006
• Alpar, R. (2013). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Detay Yayıncılık.
• Balcı, A. (2020). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802403
• Barry, B. (2000). The loss of happiness in market democracies. Political Science Quarterly, 115(3), 456–457. https://doi.org/10.2307/2658134
• Beja, E. L. (2014). Income growth and happiness: Reassessment of the Easterlin Paradox. International Review of Economics, 61(4), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0211-y
• Beja, E. L. (2017). The asymmetric effects of macroeconomic performance on happiness: Evidence for the EU. Intereconomics, 52(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0670-y
• Berggren, N. ve Bjørnskov, C. (2020). Institutions and life satisfaction. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics (pp. 1–48). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_192-1
• Betsey, S. ve Justin, W. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008(1), 1–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0001
• Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A. ve Fischer, J. A. V. (2010). Formal institutions and subjective well-being: Revisiting the cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.03.001
• Blanchflower, D. G. ve Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00369.x
• Blanchflower, D. G. ve Oswald, A. J. (2005). Happiness and the Human Development Index: The Paradox of Australia. The Australian Economic Review, 38(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8462.2005.00377.x
• Brown, S., Taylor, K. ve Wheatley Price, S. (2005). Debt and distress: Evaluating the psychological cost of credit. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 642–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.01.002
• Büyüköztürk, S. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32(32), 470–483. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10365/126871
• Chamsuk, W., Phimonsath, T. ve Fongsuwan, W. (2014). A structural equation model of factors that affect the ASEAN competitive advantage of the Thai Automotive Parts Industry. Research Journal of Business Management, 9(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjbm.2015.218.232
• Chan, S. M. ve Wong, H. (2022). Housing and subjective well-being in hong kong: A structural equation model. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(3), 1745–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11482-021-10000-4/TABLES/8
• Chen, L.-Y., Oparina, E., Powdthavee, N. ve Srisuma, S. (2022). Robust ranking of happiness outcomes: A median regression perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200, 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.010
• Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150876
• Clark, A. E., Frijters, P. ve Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.1.95
• Clark, A. ve Lelkes, O. (2005). Deliver us from evil: Religion as insurance. PSE Working Papers N2005-43. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00590570
• Croci Angelini, E. ve Michelangeli, A. (2012). Axiomatic measurement of multidimensional well-being inequality: Some distributional questions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(5), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2012.04.006
• Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.53
• Deutsch, K., Yoon, S. Y. ve Goulias, K. (2013). Modeling travel behavior and sense of place using a structural equation model. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.001
• Diener, E. ve Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.653
• Diener, E., Tay, L. ve Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030487
• Doğan, O., Bulut, Z. A. ve Kökalan Çimrin, F. (2015). Bireylerin sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışlarının ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 4(29), 659–678. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/30617
• Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. ve White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001
• Doll, W. J., Xia, W. ve Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524
• Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G. ve Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). Is it culture or democracy? The impact of democracy and culture on happiness. Social Indicators Research, 82(3), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9048-4
• Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth (pp. 89–125). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7
• Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00646
• Easterlin, R. A. ve Angelescu, L. (2009). Happiness and growth the world over: Time series evidence on the Happiness-Income Paradox. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1369806
• Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, İ., Demir, O., Özdamar, K. ve Sanisoğlu, S. Y. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices: Review. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2011-26747
• Fahey, T. ve Smyth, E. (2004). Do subjective indicators measure welfare? Evidence from 33 European societies. European Societies, 6(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000176297
• Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 997–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.003
• Frey, B. S. ve Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00570
• Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H. ve Bühner, M. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3510–3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2
• Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world. In happiness around the world: The Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199549054.001.0001
• Graham, C., Eggers, A. ve Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(3), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.09.002
• Guba, E. G. ve Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology, 30(4), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
• Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.764
• Haucap, J. ve Heimeshoff, U. (2014). The happiness of economists: Estimating the causal effect of studying economics on subjective well-being. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.004
• Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-9993(02)00057-3
• Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well‐being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34–C45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01074.x
• Helliwell, J. F. ve Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well–being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522
• Henson, R. K. ve Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
• Hong, Y., Wang, X., Liu, L., Su, Y., Chen, L., Lian, R. ve Liao, M. (2022). The relationship between social class and subjective well-being: A serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1002585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002585
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. ve Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
• Howard, M. C. (2023). A systematic literature review of exploratory factor analyses in management. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113969
• Hudson, J. (2006). Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos, 59(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00319.x
• Joshanloo, M. (2016). Revisiting the empirical distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 2023–2036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z
• Karaman, H., Atar, B. ve Çobanoğlu Atan, D. (2017). Açımlayıcı faktör analizinde kullanılan faktör çıkartma yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 1173–1193. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.309356
• Li, X. ve Lyu, H. (2022). Social status and subjective well-being in chinese adults: Mediating effect of future time perspective. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(4), 2101–2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-10026-8
• Lim, H.-E., Shaw, D., Liao, P.-S. ve Duan, H. (2020). The effects of income on happiness in East and South Asia: Societal values matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(2), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00088-9
• Louis, V. V. ve Zhao, S. (2002). Effects of family structure, family SES, and adulthood experiences on life satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 23(8), 986–1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251302237300
• Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305774268255
• Mahama, T. A. K. ve Maharjan, K. L. (2018). Generalised ordered model for conceptualising and ascertaining the determinants of livelihood satisfaction in Ghana. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(4), 1195–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9868-8
• Marshall, C. ve G. B. Rossman (2014). Designing qualitative research. New York: Sage.
• Marques, D. R., Gomes, A. A. ve de Azevedo, M. H. P. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis of the portuguese version of the arousal predisposition scale. Current Psychology, 38(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9589-5
• McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods. London: Routledge.
• Mikucka, M., Sarracino, F. ve Dubrow, J. K. (2017). When does economic growth improve life satisfaction? Multilevel analysis of the roles of social trust and income inequality in 46 countries, 1981–2012. World Development, 93, 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.002
• Mo, P. K. H., Wong, E. L. Y., Yeung, N. C. Y., Wong, S. Y. S., Chung, R. Y., Tong, A. C. Y., Ko, C. C. Y., Li, J. ve Yeoh, E. K. (2022). Differential associations among social support, health promoting behaviors, health-related quality of life and subjective well-being in older and younger persons: A structural equation modelling approach. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12955-022-01931-Z/FIGURES/3
• Najaf, P., Thill, J.-C., Zhang, W. ve Fields, M. G. (2018). City-level urban form and traffic safety: A structural equation modeling analysis of direct and indirect effects. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.003
• Netemeyer, R., Bearden, W. ve Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures. In Scaling Procedures. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985772
• Ng, Y.-K. (2022). Happiness or life satisfaction? Happiness—Concept, Measurement and Promotion (pp. 33–39). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4972-8_4
• Nguyen, J. K., Fleming, C. M. ve Su, J.-J. (2015). Does income inequality make us less happy? Australian Economic Review, 48(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12083.
• Nunnally, J. C. ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3. Baskı), New York: McGrawHill
• Okur-Berberoğlu, E. ve Uygun, S. (2012). Çevre farkındalığı- çevre tutumu arasındaki ilişkinin yapısal eşitlik modeli ile sınanması. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 25(2), 459–473. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uefad/issue/16696/173560
• Orcan, F. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Which one to use first? Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 9(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.394323
• Ott, J. C. (2010). Good governance and happiness in nations: Technical quality precedes democracy and quality beats size. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9144-7
• Paleologou, S. M. (2022). Happiness, democracy and socio-economic conditions: Evidence from a difference GMM estimator. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 101, 101945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101945
• Pichler, F. (2006). Subjective quality of life of young europeans. Feeling happy but who knows why? Social Indicators Research, 75(3), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4337-2
• Polat, M. (2022). Bireylerin hedonik ve faydacı tüketim eğilimlerinin ekonomik kazanım düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisi: Kamu personeli üzerine ampirik bir uygulama. Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6 (2), 381-412. DOI: 10.33399/biibfad.1156476
• Polat, M. ve Bulut, C. (2023). İkinci el otomobil fiyat artışına etki eden faktörlerin yapısal eşitlik modeli ile tespit edilmesi: Van ili örneği. Sosyoekonomi, 31(55), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.18
• Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1459–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.04.004
• Reisinger, Y. ve Turner, L. (1999). Structural equation modeling with Lisrel: application in tourism. Tourism Management, 20(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00104-6
• Ribeiro, S. C. ve Santos, A. D. (2019). The economics of happiness: An approach to Portuguese economy. Economics & Sociology, 12(4), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/12
• Ritchey, L. H., Ritchey, L. H. ve Dietz, B. E. (2001). Clarifying the measurement of activity. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 26(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J016v26n01_01
• Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B. ve Wolfers, J. (2012). The new stylized facts about income and subjective well-being. Emotion, 12(6), 1181–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029873
• Sarıgül, H. (2015). Finansal okuryazarlık tutum ve davranış ölçeği: Geliştirme, geçerlik ve güvenirlik. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 13(1), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.11611/jmer408
• Schoon, I., Hansson, L. ve Salmela-Aro, K. (2005). Combining work and family life. European Psychologist, 10(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.4.309
• Segars, A. H. ve Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 17(4), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/249590
• Shams, K. (2014). Determinants of subjective well-being and poverty in rural Pakistan: A micro-level study. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1755–1773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0571-9
• Shams, K. (2016). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being and poverty: An economic perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(6), 2213–2236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9691-z
• Stanca, L. (2010). The geography of economics and happiness: Spatial patterns in the effects of economic conditions on well-being. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9571-1
• Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.04.003
• Stutzer, A. ve Frey, B. S. (2012). Recent developments in the economics of happiness: A selective overview. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2192854
• Sugawara, E. ve Nikaido, H. (2014). Properties of AdeABC and AdeIJK Efflux systems of acinetobacter baumannii compared with those of the AcrAB-TolC system of escherichia coli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 58(12), 7250–7257. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.03728-14
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3. Baskı), New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
• Tella, R. Di ve MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526111
• Trendafilov, N. ve Hirose, K. (2023). Exploratory factor analysis. i International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) (pp. 600–606). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.10015-6
• TÜİK. (2022, 17 Şubat). Yaşam memnuniyeti araştırması. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Yaşam-Memnuniyeti-Araştırması-2022-49691&dil=1
• TÜRK-İŞ. (2023, July 17).. TÜRK-İŞ Haziran 2023 açlık ve yoksulluk sınırı. https://www.turkis.org.tr/turk-is-haziran-2023-aclik-ve-yoksulluk-siniri/
• Uçgunoğlu Erarslan, M. ve Yayar, R. (2022). Türkiye’de mutluluk ekonomisi. Journal of International Management, Educational and Economics Perspectives, 10(1), 43–58. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jimeep/issue/70674/1126537
• Ural, A. ve Kılıç, İ. (2011). Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Veenhoven, R. (2005). Happiness in nations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 351–355.
• Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
• Weston, R. ve Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
• Worldvaluessurvey.org. (2019). WVS Database [online]. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp
• Yan, B. ve Wen, B. (2020). Income inequality, corruption and subjective well-being. Applied Economics, 52(12), 1311–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1661953
• Yang, L., Lu, H. ve Li, M. (2023). Multidimensional inequality and subjective well-being in China: A generalized ordered logit model analysis. Social Indicators Research, 165(3), 1021–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03060-y