Mansur al-Hallaj In Context of The Critics and Appreciations of Sufis
Abstract
One of the most influential sufis in the history of sufism Mansur al-Hallaj, has earned a great
reputation for his ideas, extraordinary sufi attitude, and tragic death. Hallaj has sparked attention of
many scholars and intellectuals from different fields some of which criticized him very severely while
many of others hold him in a high regard. The majority of aforementioned critics and appreciations
have come from the community of sufi. Such as there were many sufis who praised or criticized him in
his life, so too were there after his death. This article will deal with praises and critics of sufis lived
between his lifetimeto 14. century, about Hallaj’s sufistic ideas and personality and clarify hiseffects on
mystics in this context.
Keywords
References
- Altıntaş, Hayrani, Tasavvuf Tarihi, Ankara 1985.
- Attâr, Ferîdüddîn, Tezkiretü’l-evliyâ, çev. Süleyman Uludağ, İlim ve Kültür Yay., Bursa 1984.
- Bakış, Rıza, Hallâc’a Göre Varlık ve Dînî Tecrübe, Doktora Tezi, danışman: Turan Koç, Erciyes Üniversitesi, 2010.
- ______, “Hüseyin b. Mansûr el-Hallâc”, Doğudan Batıya Düşüncenin Serüveni, editör: Bayram Ali Çetinkaya, İnsan Yay., İstanbul 2015, c. 7, s. 59-66.
- Baltacı, Halil, Necmeddin Dâye-i Râzî Hayatı Eserleri ve Tasavvufî Görüşleri, İnsan Yay., İstanbul 2011.
- Baz, İbrahim, Abdülehad Nûrî, İnsan Yay., İstanbul 2007.
- Buhârî, Muhammed b. İsmâîl, el-Câmiu’s-Sahîh, Çağrı Yay., İstanbul 1992.
- Bursevî, İsmail Hakkı, Rûhü’l-Mesnevî, haz. İsmail Güleç, İnsan Yay., İstanbul 2004.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Religious Studies
Journal Section
-
Authors
Publication Date
June 20, 2017
Submission Date
June 20, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Number: 47
Cited By
İmam Kuşeyrî’nin Hallâc-ı Mansûr’u Müdafaası
Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.906737HALLÂC-I MANSUR’UN MESNEVÎ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ
Littera Turca Journal of Turkish Language and Literature
https://doi.org/10.20322/littera.954933