Markalaşma bağlamında sıra dışı markaların işlevi: Tat, koku ve ses markalarının korunması
Abstract
Keywords
markalaşma, marka hukuku, geleneksel olmayan markalar, markaların korunması
References
- Alamro, A. A. (2010). Branding and brand preference in the mobile phone service industry (Doktora tezi). Bangor Üniversitesi, Gwynedd.
- Anholt, S. (2005). Brand new justice. Routledge.
- Atkins E. (2013, 25 Haziran). In re Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co., 106 U.S.P.Q.2d 1042 (TTAB Feb. 25, 2013). Lexology. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=01526ea5-8d80-4978-811c-aaaa95786d6d
- Basford, J. L. (2012). A commodity of good names: The branding of products, c.1650-1900 (Doktora tezi). York Üniversitesi, Heslington.
- Bleeker, G. W. ve Koplow, M. (2019, 1 Mayıs). Can you trademark sounds, smells, colours, motions and flavours? World Trademark Review. https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/can-you-trademark-sounds-smells-colours-motions-and-flavours
- Chiaravalle, B. ve Schenck, F. B. (2013). Markalaşma for dummies meraklısına (Çev. A. Hazaryan). Doğan.
- Elias, B. (1992). Do scents signify source? An argument against trademark protection for fragrances. International Trademark Association.
- EUIPO. (____). 000428870 marka kaydı. https://euipo.europa.eu/eSearch/#details/trademarks/000428870
- EUIPO. (2003, 4 Ağustos). Decision of the second board of appeal, Eli Lilly and company, r 120/2001-2. https://www.copat.de/markenformen/r0120-2001-2.pdf
- Faye, M. H. (1998). The smell of success: Trade dress protection for scent marks. Marquette intellectual property law review, 2(1), 105-156. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol2/iss1/4