Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

DEMOCRACY, CRISIS AND DESTABILIZATION

Year 2022, , 393 - 412, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1173801

Abstract

In the last decades, democracies have been in decline. They have suffered for a long time from the rise of populism and nationalism and are lately struggling with the consequences of the global pandemic, COVID-19. The pandemic has highlighted the importance of defending and preserving democracies under the threat of both external and internal destabilizing factors that can lead to regime changes. It has had a significant impact on democratic freedoms and rights. Moreover, it has also raised concerns in terms of countries’ abilities to face the challenges that come as a result of the pandemic and which threaten the existence of liberal democracies. In this paper, we argue that when individual liberties are threatened and negatively impacted by a crisis, consolidated democracies which embody such liberties, may experience a shift back to semi-consolidated, autocratic regimes and so on. In addition to that, the presence of a crisis in the equation between individual liberties and collective good, will result in the latter outweighing the former, with the potential to trigger regime change.

References

  • Adler, G., & Webster, E. (1995). Challenging transition theory: The labor movement, radical reform, and transition to democracy in South Africa. Politics & Society, 23(1), 75-106.
  • Aljazeera (2020) Start Here. [Online] Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/program/start-here/2020/5/10/has-surveillance-during-the-pandemic-gone-too-far-start-here/.
  • Everson, S. (1988). Aristotle on the Foundations of the State. Political studies, 36(1), 89-101.
  • Beniuszys, P.(2020, October 9) Authoritarian Change, Public Broadcasters, and “Fake News” in Poland. Review#13. 4Liberty.eu. (Access 13.12.2020)
  • Bollen, K. A. (1986). Political rights and political liberties in nations: An evaluation of human rights measures, 1950 to 1984. Hum. Rts. Q., 8, 567.
  • Carothers, T., & O'Donohue, A. (Eds.). (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press.
  • Centre for Civil and Political Rights (2020). COVID- 19 State of Emergency Data. [Online] Available at: https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/1sHT8quopdfavCvSDk7t-zvqKIS0Ljiu0/page/dHMKB (Accessed 9.10.2020).
  • Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World politics, 49(3), 430-451.
  • Cornfield, M. (2020). The states we're in: can ‘laboratories of democracy’ conquer Covid-19?. [Online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/11/us-states-laboratories-of-democracy-covid-19 (Accessed 10.10.2020).
  • Dahl, R. A. (1986). Democracy, liberty, and equality. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Dawood, Y. (2013). Democracy and the freedom of speech: Rethinking the conflict between liberty and equality. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 26(2), 293-311.
  • European Economic and Social Committee (2020). Civil Society Against COVID-19. (Online) Available at: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/initiatives/civil-society-against-covid-19.
  • Freedom House (2020). Freedom in the World 2020. (Online) Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2020/leaderless-struggle-democracy (Accessed 10.09. 2020).
  • Freedom House (2020). Nations in Transit. (Online) Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit (Accessed 10 September 2020).
  • Gasiorowski, M. J. (1995). Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis. American political science review, 89(4), 882-897.
  • Honig, B., 2009. Emergency politics: paradox, law, democracy. Princeton University Press.
  • Jankwicz, N., 2020. The Growing Threat of Domestic Disinformation in Poland. [Online] Available at: https://www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/the-growing-threat-of-domestic-disinformation-in-poland [Accessed 2 October 2020].
  • Iglhaut, C., 2020. Facts for Democracy. [Online] Available at: https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/culture/combatting-fake-news-about-coronavirus-how-germany-is-tackling-the-problem [Accessed 10 October 2020].
  • International Foundation for Electoral Systems, 2020. IFES COVID-19 Briefing Series: Preventing Government Corruption in Crises. [Online] Available at: https://www.ifes.org/publications/ifes-covid-19-briefing-series-preventing-government-corruption-crises [Accessed 2 October 2020].
  • Kuehnelt-Leddihn, E., 2007. Liberty or Equality: The Challenge of Our Times. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • Lazar, N.C., 2009. States of emergency in liberal democracies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindner, R. and Aichholzer, G., 2020. E-democracy: conceptual foundations and recent trends. In European E-Democracy in Practice (pp. 11-45). Springer, Cham.
  • Merkel, W., 2018. Democracy and Crisis Challenges in Turbulent Times. Springer.
  • Montesquieu. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press
  • Morlino, L., 2004. What is a ‘good’democracy?. Democratization, 11(5), pp.10-32.
  • Mouffe, C., 1992. Democratic citizenship and the political community. Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community, pp.225-239.
  • O'Toole Jr, L.J., 1987. Doctrines and developments: Separation of powers, the politics-administration dichotomy, and the rise of the administrative state. Public Administration Review, pp.17-25.
  • Peters, Y., 2016. Zero-sum democracy? The effects of direct democracy on representative participation. Political Studies, 64(3), pp.593-613.
  • Rapeli, L. and Saikkonen, I., 2020. How Will the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Democracy?. Democratic Theory, 7(2), pp.25-32.
  • Read, H., 2015. The politics of the unpolitical. Routledge.
  • Rustow, D.A., 1970. Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative politics, 2(3), pp.337-363.
  • Sartori, G., 2016. the Theory of Democracy Revisited. Democracy: A Reader, p.192
  • Spasovska, B., 2020. Civil Society Role in Participatory Democracy in Times of COVID-19 in The Balkans 0. [Online] Available at: http://www.balkancsd.net/civil-society-role-in-participatory-democracy-in-times-of-covid-19-in-the-balkans/ [Accessed 20 November 20202].
  • Transparancy International , 2020. Civil Society in the Post Pandemic World. [Online] Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/blog/civil-society-in-the-post-pandemic-world-1# [Accessed 05 September 2020].
  • Thomson, S. and Ip, E.C., 2020. COVID-19 emergency measures and the impending pandemic. Journal of Law and the Biosciences.
  • Verba, Sidney. "Democratic participation." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 373, no. 1 (1967): 53-78.
  • Zhu, X., Yang, S., & Allen, S. (2022, January). A Comparison of False-Information Policies in Five Countries before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Wike, M.D.a.R., 2020. America is exceptional in the nature of its political divide. [Online] Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/11/13/america-is-exceptional-in-the-nature-of-its-political-divide/ [Accessed 20 November 2020].

DEMOCRACY, CRISIS AND DESTABILIZATION

Year 2022, , 393 - 412, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1173801

Abstract

In the last decades, democracies have been in decline. They have suffered for a long time from the rise of populism and nationalism and are lately struggling with the consequences of the global pandemic, COVID-19. The pandemic has highlighted the importance of defending and preserving democracies under the threat of both external and internal destabilizing factors that can lead to regime changes. It has had a significant impact on democratic freedoms and rights. Moreover, it has also raised concerns in terms of countries’ abilities to face the challenges that come as a result of the pandemic and which threaten the existence of liberal democracies. In this paper, we argue that when individual liberties are threatened and negatively impacted by a crisis, consolidated democracies which embody such liberties, may experience a shift back to semi-consolidated, autocratic regimes and so on. In addition to that, the presence of a crisis in the equation between individual liberties and collective good, will result in the latter outweighing the former, with the potential to trigger regime change.

References

  • Adler, G., & Webster, E. (1995). Challenging transition theory: The labor movement, radical reform, and transition to democracy in South Africa. Politics & Society, 23(1), 75-106.
  • Aljazeera (2020) Start Here. [Online] Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/program/start-here/2020/5/10/has-surveillance-during-the-pandemic-gone-too-far-start-here/.
  • Everson, S. (1988). Aristotle on the Foundations of the State. Political studies, 36(1), 89-101.
  • Beniuszys, P.(2020, October 9) Authoritarian Change, Public Broadcasters, and “Fake News” in Poland. Review#13. 4Liberty.eu. (Access 13.12.2020)
  • Bollen, K. A. (1986). Political rights and political liberties in nations: An evaluation of human rights measures, 1950 to 1984. Hum. Rts. Q., 8, 567.
  • Carothers, T., & O'Donohue, A. (Eds.). (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press.
  • Centre for Civil and Political Rights (2020). COVID- 19 State of Emergency Data. [Online] Available at: https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/1sHT8quopdfavCvSDk7t-zvqKIS0Ljiu0/page/dHMKB (Accessed 9.10.2020).
  • Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World politics, 49(3), 430-451.
  • Cornfield, M. (2020). The states we're in: can ‘laboratories of democracy’ conquer Covid-19?. [Online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/11/us-states-laboratories-of-democracy-covid-19 (Accessed 10.10.2020).
  • Dahl, R. A. (1986). Democracy, liberty, and equality. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Dawood, Y. (2013). Democracy and the freedom of speech: Rethinking the conflict between liberty and equality. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 26(2), 293-311.
  • European Economic and Social Committee (2020). Civil Society Against COVID-19. (Online) Available at: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/initiatives/civil-society-against-covid-19.
  • Freedom House (2020). Freedom in the World 2020. (Online) Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2020/leaderless-struggle-democracy (Accessed 10.09. 2020).
  • Freedom House (2020). Nations in Transit. (Online) Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit (Accessed 10 September 2020).
  • Gasiorowski, M. J. (1995). Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis. American political science review, 89(4), 882-897.
  • Honig, B., 2009. Emergency politics: paradox, law, democracy. Princeton University Press.
  • Jankwicz, N., 2020. The Growing Threat of Domestic Disinformation in Poland. [Online] Available at: https://www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/the-growing-threat-of-domestic-disinformation-in-poland [Accessed 2 October 2020].
  • Iglhaut, C., 2020. Facts for Democracy. [Online] Available at: https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/culture/combatting-fake-news-about-coronavirus-how-germany-is-tackling-the-problem [Accessed 10 October 2020].
  • International Foundation for Electoral Systems, 2020. IFES COVID-19 Briefing Series: Preventing Government Corruption in Crises. [Online] Available at: https://www.ifes.org/publications/ifes-covid-19-briefing-series-preventing-government-corruption-crises [Accessed 2 October 2020].
  • Kuehnelt-Leddihn, E., 2007. Liberty or Equality: The Challenge of Our Times. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • Lazar, N.C., 2009. States of emergency in liberal democracies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindner, R. and Aichholzer, G., 2020. E-democracy: conceptual foundations and recent trends. In European E-Democracy in Practice (pp. 11-45). Springer, Cham.
  • Merkel, W., 2018. Democracy and Crisis Challenges in Turbulent Times. Springer.
  • Montesquieu. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press
  • Morlino, L., 2004. What is a ‘good’democracy?. Democratization, 11(5), pp.10-32.
  • Mouffe, C., 1992. Democratic citizenship and the political community. Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community, pp.225-239.
  • O'Toole Jr, L.J., 1987. Doctrines and developments: Separation of powers, the politics-administration dichotomy, and the rise of the administrative state. Public Administration Review, pp.17-25.
  • Peters, Y., 2016. Zero-sum democracy? The effects of direct democracy on representative participation. Political Studies, 64(3), pp.593-613.
  • Rapeli, L. and Saikkonen, I., 2020. How Will the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Democracy?. Democratic Theory, 7(2), pp.25-32.
  • Read, H., 2015. The politics of the unpolitical. Routledge.
  • Rustow, D.A., 1970. Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative politics, 2(3), pp.337-363.
  • Sartori, G., 2016. the Theory of Democracy Revisited. Democracy: A Reader, p.192
  • Spasovska, B., 2020. Civil Society Role in Participatory Democracy in Times of COVID-19 in The Balkans 0. [Online] Available at: http://www.balkancsd.net/civil-society-role-in-participatory-democracy-in-times-of-covid-19-in-the-balkans/ [Accessed 20 November 20202].
  • Transparancy International , 2020. Civil Society in the Post Pandemic World. [Online] Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/blog/civil-society-in-the-post-pandemic-world-1# [Accessed 05 September 2020].
  • Thomson, S. and Ip, E.C., 2020. COVID-19 emergency measures and the impending pandemic. Journal of Law and the Biosciences.
  • Verba, Sidney. "Democratic participation." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 373, no. 1 (1967): 53-78.
  • Zhu, X., Yang, S., & Allen, S. (2022, January). A Comparison of False-Information Policies in Five Countries before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Wike, M.D.a.R., 2020. America is exceptional in the nature of its political divide. [Online] Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/11/13/america-is-exceptional-in-the-nature-of-its-political-divide/ [Accessed 20 November 2020].
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Political Science
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Reına Shehı 0000-0002-3297-442X

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Submission Date September 11, 2022
Acceptance Date November 10, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022

Cite

APA Shehı, R. (2022). DEMOCRACY, CRISIS AND DESTABILIZATION. İmgelem, 6(11), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1173801

cc-by-nc_1.png

This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Please click here to contact the publisher.