Review

DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD

Volume: 5 Number: 9 December 17, 2021
EN TR

DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD

Abstract

Dickens wrote in times when women were officially possessions of their husbands, fathers or of any male who was acknowledged as the head of the family. Families forbade their girls to read novels whose heroines were contentious such as Anne Brontë’s The Tenant of Wildfell Hall and Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. Although Dickens is widely attacked for his feeble female characters in line with the angel in the house doctrine, according to his great granddaughter Lucinda Dickens Hawskley, he is the fruit of the able women in his life aside from the Victorian ideals. Elizabeth Dickens, his paternal grandmother, was a housekeeper who inspired him with her kind nature and storytelling. It was his mother, Elizabeth Barrow, who taught him mathematics, literacy and Latin. According to Dickens, to be a complete human being, the masculine sides of men should be harmonized with the feminine traits of women. Similar to the influential women in his life, Dickens’ weak, angelic female characters are, at the same time, the women who complete a lack in men and enable them to become ideal human beings via their feminine characteristics. In this respect, a new type of androgyny, which the paper names as the Dickensian androgyny, might be observed in Dickens’ male characters. Accordingly, this paper aims to dwell on Dickens’ concept of androgyny to grow into a complete human being through the harmony of male and female characteristics as mirrored in his character David in David Copperfield.  

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander, Doris (1991). Creating Characters with Charles Dickens, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania UP.
  2. “Androgynous.” (1995). The Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  3. Dickens, Charles (2000). David Copperfield, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited.
  4. Dyson, A. E. (1968). Dickens: Modern Judgements, London: McMillan.
  5. Farwell, Marilyn R. (1975). Virginia Woolf and Androgyny, Contemporary Literature, (16.4), 433-451.
  6. Fielding, K. J. (1965). Charles Dickens: A Critical Introduction, London: Longman.
  7. Gold, Joseph (1972).Charles Dickens: Radical Moralist, Minneapolis: Minnesota UP.
  8. Gordery, Gareth (2008). David Copperfield. David Paroissien (Ed.), A Companion to Charles Dickens içinde (369- 379), Oxford: Blackwell.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

December 17, 2021

Submission Date

August 14, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 4, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 9

APA
Yıldız, N. (2021). DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD. İmgelem, 5(9), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.982785
AMA
1.Yıldız N. DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD. İMGELEM. 2021;5(9):329-347. doi:10.53791/imgelem.982785
Chicago
Yıldız, Nazan. 2021. “DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD”. İmgelem 5 (9): 329-47. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.982785.
EndNote
Yıldız N (December 1, 2021) DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD. İmgelem 5 9 329–347.
IEEE
[1]N. Yıldız, “DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD”, İMGELEM, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 329–347, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.53791/imgelem.982785.
ISNAD
Yıldız, Nazan. “DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD”. İmgelem 5/9 (December 1, 2021): 329-347. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.982785.
JAMA
1.Yıldız N. DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD. İMGELEM. 2021;5:329–347.
MLA
Yıldız, Nazan. “DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD”. İmgelem, vol. 5, no. 9, Dec. 2021, pp. 329-47, doi:10.53791/imgelem.982785.
Vancouver
1.Nazan Yıldız. DICKENSIAN CONCEPT OF ANDROGYNY: GENDER RELATIONS IN DAVID COPPERFIELD. İMGELEM. 2021 Dec. 1;5(9):329-47. doi:10.53791/imgelem.982785