Research Article

Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract

Number: 92 August 24, 2022
EN

Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract

Abstract

In this study, the mediator role of the psychological contract on the effect of workplace flexibility on organizational commitment was examined. The sample of the research consists of 112 participants working in different sectors and positions in Istanbul. To test the research hypotheses, Simple Regression Analysis and Hierarchical Regression Analysis were performed. As a result of the analyses, the full mediator role of the relational psychological contract and the partial mediator role of the transactional psychological contract on the relationship between workplace flexibility and affective commitment and normative commitment were determined. With the inclusion of continuance commitment in the analysis as a dependent variable, the mediating role of both types of psychological contracts did not occur. Organizations can influence their employees’ psychological contracts and increase their commitment to the organization by providing flexibility in the work environment. There is a limited number of national studies in which employees’ perceptions of flexible practices in the workplace are considered. Also, it is predicted that examining flexibility within the scope of different models will contribute to the field.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x google scholar
  2. Anderson, N., & Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 637-647. google scholar
  3. Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice, 10. Edition, London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page. google scholar
  4. Arthur, M. M., & Cook, A. (2003). The relationship between work-family human resource practices and firm profitability: A multi-theoretical perspective. Research In Personnel and Human Resource Management, 22, 219-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22005-3 google scholar
  5. Avcı, M., & Yavuz, E. (2020).Çalışanlarm esnek çalışma düzenlemelerine yönelik tutumlarının işe devamsızlık algıları üzerindeki etkileri: kamu kuramlarında bir alan araştırması. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18 (35), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.510842 google scholar
  6. Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 545-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12028 google scholar
  7. Camlı, L. G. (2010). Esnek çalışma saatleri ve çalışanların esnek çalışma saatleri düzenlemelerine yönelik tutumlarının örgüte bağlılıkları üzerine etkisi (Master thesis). Marmara University Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul. google scholar
  8. Cohen, A. (2011).Values and psychological contracts in their relationship to commitment in the workplace. Career Development International, 16 (7), 646-667. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111187272 google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 24, 2022

Submission Date

January 21, 2022

Acceptance Date

April 28, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Number: 92

APA
Çam Kahraman, F., & Tüzüner, V. L. (2022). Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal, 92, 61-81. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2022.92.004
AMA
1.Çam Kahraman F, Tüzüner VL. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal. 2022;(92):61-81. doi:10.26650/imj.2022.92.004
Chicago
Çam Kahraman, Fatma, and Vala Lale Tüzüner. 2022. “Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract”. Istanbul Management Journal, nos. 92: 61-81. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2022.92.004.
EndNote
Çam Kahraman F, Tüzüner VL (August 1, 2022) Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal 92 61–81.
IEEE
[1]F. Çam Kahraman and V. L. Tüzüner, “Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract”, Istanbul Management Journal, no. 92, pp. 61–81, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.26650/imj.2022.92.004.
ISNAD
Çam Kahraman, Fatma - Tüzüner, Vala Lale. “Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract”. Istanbul Management Journal. 92 (August 1, 2022): 61-81. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2022.92.004.
JAMA
1.Çam Kahraman F, Tüzüner VL. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal. 2022;:61–81.
MLA
Çam Kahraman, Fatma, and Vala Lale Tüzüner. “Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract”. Istanbul Management Journal, no. 92, Aug. 2022, pp. 61-81, doi:10.26650/imj.2022.92.004.
Vancouver
1.Fatma Çam Kahraman, Vala Lale Tüzüner. Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract. Istanbul Management Journal. 2022 Aug. 1;(92):61-8. doi:10.26650/imj.2022.92.004