Güçlendirici Liderliğin Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Algılanan Örgütsel Destek Davranışının Aracı Rolü: Bilişim Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Year 2019, , 27 - 48, 23.12.2019

Ender Barış İmamoğlu , Aygül Dönmez Turan

https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.87.0002

Abstract

Bilgi işletmeler için hayati önem arz etmektedir. Değişen çevreyi takip etmek oldukça zor olduğu için yöneticiler astlarına kendi yetki ve sorumluluklarını dağıtmakta, onların da çevreden gelen bilgileri değerlendirip karar verme süreçlerine dahil olmalarını beklemektedir. Çalışanlar ise, edindikleri bilgileri çevresiyle paylaşarak örgüt içi etkinlik ve verimliliğin devamlılığını sağlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, bilgi paylaşımında tarafların birbirlerini tanımaları ve doğru zamanda, doğru bilgiyi birbirlerine aktararak birbirlerine destek olmaları gerekmektedir. Bahsi geçen bu nedenler örgüt düzeyinde bilgi paylaşımının ne kadar önemli olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada da bilgi paylaşımını tetikleyici unsurlar olarak güçlendirici liderlik ve örgütsel destek algısı ele alınmıştır. Bunun için “Bilişim 500” listesindeki işletmelerde görev yapan 149 bilişim sektörü çalışanından anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Bilgi paylaşımı, güçlendirici liderlik, algılanan örgütsel destek ölçekleriyle elde edilen bu veriler öncelikle geçerlilik testi için faktör analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Daha sonra her bir ölçeğin Cronbach Alpha değerleri güvenilirlik için incelenmiştir. Son olarak hipotez testi için hiyerarşik regresyon analizi yapılmış ve bu analizin sonuçları PROCESS makrosu ile doğrulanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda güçlendirici liderliğin bilgi paylaşımı davranışına etkisinde algılanan örgütsel desteğin kısmı aracılık rolü üstlendiği bulunmuştur. 

Keywords

Güçlendirici Liderlik, Algılanan Örgütsel Destek, Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışı, Bilişim Sektörü

Supporting Institution

Yazarlar bu çalışma için finansal destek almamışlardır.

The Mediator Role of Perceived Organizational Support in the Relationship between Empowering Leadership and Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Research in the Information Sect

Abstract

Information plays crucial role in organizations. Managers share their power with subordinates, expect them to respond information recieved from enviroment and participate in decision-making processes in order to survive in changing environment. Besides, employees maintain the organizational effectiveness and efficiency by sharing knowldge. In this context, employees should know the collegues well and help each other by sharing the right information at the right time. These reasons underline the importance of knowledge sharing. In this study, empowering leadership and perceived organizational support are discussed as predictors of knowledge sharing behavior. For this purpose, data was collected from 149 white-collar IT employees working in the companies which is listed in "Bilişim 500". The data collected through the knowledge sharing behavior, empowering leadership, perceived organizational support scales is analysed by factor analysis in order to test the validation of the scales. Then Cronbach's Alpha values are assessed for testing reliability of the scales. Lastly, in order to test the hypothesis hierarchical regression analysis was used and results are verified via PROCESS macro.As a result the mediating role of perceived organizational support on the relationship between empowering leadership and knowledge sharing behavior is partially supported.

Keywords

Empowering Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support, Knowledge Sharing Behavior, Information Sector

References

• Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945.
• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 107-136.
• Arneguy, E., Ohana, M., & Stinglhamber, F. (2018). Organizational justice and readiness for change: A concomitant examination of the mediating role of perceived organizational support and identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
• Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249-269.
• Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.
• Bennis, W. G. (1966). Changing organizations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2(3), 247-263.
• Best, A., & Holmes, B. (2010). Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 6(2), 145-159.
• Blau, P. M. (1968). Social exchange. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 7, 452-457.
• Bowen, D. E., & Lawler III, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. MIT Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31.
• Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2019). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Cummings, A., & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40(1), 22-38.
• Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi (5. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık. (7. Baskı)
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
• Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51.
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500.
• Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of The Product Development & Management Association, 19(2), 110-132.
• García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V. J., & Bolívar-Ramos, M. T. (2017). The influence of top management support for ICTs on organisational performance through knowledge acquisition, transfer, and utilisation. Review of Managerial Science, 11(1), 19-51.
• Güçlü, N., & Sotirofski, K. (2006). Bilgi yönetimi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(4), 351-373.
• Güney, S., Akalın, Ç., & İlsev, A. (2007). Duygusal örgütsel bağlılık gelişiminde algılanan örgütsel destek ve örgüt temelli öz-saygı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 189-211.
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
• Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Liu, C. T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183-195.
• İşevi, A. S., & Çelme, B. (2005). Bilgi çağında yeni hazine: Entelektüel sermayeyle rekabeti yakalamak. Bilgi Dünyası, 6(2), 251-267.
• Karaaslan, A., Özler, D. E., & Kulaklıoğlu, A. S. (2009). Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ve Bilgi Paylaşımı Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 135-160.
• Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301-313.
• Kulakli, A., & Birgün, S. (2011). Müşteri merkezli operasyonel bilgi yönetimi için veri yönetiminin ölçülmesi. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Dergisi/B, 2(1).
• Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884.
• Kutanis, R., & Mercan, N. (2015). Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışlarının Örgüt Kültürüyle İlişkisine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 2(2), 147-155.
• Lan, X. M., & Chong, W. Y. (2015). The mediating role of psychological empowerment between transformational leadership and employee work attitudes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 184-191.
• Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228.
• Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 106-129.
• Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
• McKenney, J. L., Mason, R. O., & Copeland, D. C. (1995). Waves of change: business evolution through information technology. Harvard Business School Press.
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation Oxford. Journal of Economic Perspectives.
• Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Source: The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile üniversite öğrencilerinin bazı demografik özellikleri ve akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (20).
• Robbins, S. P. (2000). Managing today!. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Senge, P. M. (1997). The fifth discipline. Measuring Business Excellence, 1(3), 46-51.
• Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219.
• Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689.
• Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Wang, T. (2016). Charismatic leadership and tacit knowledge sharing in the context of enterprise systems learning: The mediating effect of psychological safety climate and intrinsic motivation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(2), 194-208.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.
• Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429-439.
• Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
• Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
• Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
• Yılmaz, M. (2017). Enformasyon ve bilgi kavramları bağlamında enformasyon yönetimi ve bilgi yönetimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 49(1).
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
• Zhong, L., Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (2016). Job engagement, perceived organizational support, high‐performance human resource practices, and cultural value orientations: A cross‐level investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 823-844.
• Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599.