Research Article

‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON

Volume: 5 Number: 2 December 31, 2016
TR

‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze English physical chemist and novelist C. P. Snow’s novel entitled The Sleep of Reason (1968)  according to Terry Eagleton’s perspective of evil with reference to his book entitled On Evil (2010), and also aims to discuss to what extent his views on evil shed light upon the novel. Eagleton’s unconventional attitude towards evil can be easily recognized when he focuses on a rare category of evil, that is, ‘without an apparent’ reason, in his mentioned book. This type of evil is observed with the murder of an eight year-old boy after being tortured by two women named Cora and Kitty during a weekend, which happens without an apparent reason. In order to explain this type of evil, Eagleton relates the concept of motiveless evil with the death drive, freedom, free will, responsibility, destructiveness, and the influence of external factors on human beings, which are of great importance in the sense that the two women are sane and have free will; thereupon, they should assume the responsibility for what they have done. In short, Eagleton’s views on evil will be used as the critical tools in the analysis of The Sleep of Reason in this paper. 

Keywords

Evil,the death drive,freedom,free will,motiveslessness and the murder.

References

  1. Bales, K. (2004). Slavery and the Human Right to Evil. Journal of Human Rights, 3(1), 53-63.
  2. Bernstein, R. J. (2010). Radikal Kötülük, Bir Felsefi Sorgulama. Trans.: Nil Erdoğan- Filiz Deniztekin. İstanbul: Varlık Yayınları.
  3. Burris , C. T. and Rempel, J. K. (2011). Just Look at Him: Punitive Responses Cued by ‘Evil’. Symbols, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 69-80.
  4. Card, C. (2002). The Atrocity Paradigm: The Theory of Evil. New York: Oxford University Press. Corlett, A. J. (2004). Evil.Analysis, 64(1), 81-84.
  5. Coyle, S. M. (2011). Responses of Narrative Practice to the Effects of Evil. Harold Ellens, J. H. (Ed.). Explaining Evil 3, Approaches, Responses, Solutions. NY: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
  6. Duncan, S. (2012). Moral Evil, Freedom and the Goodness of God: Why Kant Abandoned Theodicy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20(5), 973- 991.
  7. Eagleton, T. (2010). On Evil. London: Yale University Press.
  8. Eppens, A. J. (2011). Evil in the Time of Thomas Aquinas. Harold Ellens, J. H. (Ed.). Explaining Evil 2, History, Global Views, and Events. NY: ABC-CLIO, LLC, USA.
  9. Fisher, R. N. (2003). The Catheter of Bilious Hatred. Breen, M. S. (Ed.).
  10. Understanding Evil: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Netherlands: Rodopi.
APA
Işık, S. (2016). ‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 105-122. https://izlik.org/JA92HD22TA
AMA
1.Işık S. ‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON. INIJOSS. 2016;5(2):105-122. https://izlik.org/JA92HD22TA
Chicago
Işık, Sevcan. 2016. “‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON”. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5 (2): 105-22. https://izlik.org/JA92HD22TA.
EndNote
Işık S (December 1, 2016) ‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5 2 105–122.
IEEE
[1]S. Işık, “‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON”, INIJOSS, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 105–122, Dec. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA92HD22TA
ISNAD
Işık, Sevcan. “‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON”. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5/2 (December 1, 2016): 105-122. https://izlik.org/JA92HD22TA.
JAMA
1.Işık S. ‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON. INIJOSS. 2016;5:105–122.
MLA
Işık, Sevcan. “‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON”. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 2, Dec. 2016, pp. 105-22, https://izlik.org/JA92HD22TA.
Vancouver
1.Sevcan Işık. ‘EVIL’ IN THE SLEEP OF REASON. INIJOSS [Internet]. 2016 Dec. 1;5(2):105-22. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA92HD22TA