Tek Kuronlarla Restore Edilen Dişlerde Farklı Post ve Kor Sistemlerinin Retrospektif Bir Değerlendirmesi

Year 2022, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 73 - 83, 10.03.2022

Fatih Demirci , Cevdet Çalışkan

https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.1019047

Abstract

Bu retrospektif klinik çalışmanın amacı; popülasyon yaşının ve cinsiyetin, restorasyon tipinin, diş pozisyonunun, post materyal tipinin, karşıt dişlerin etkisinin ve kullanılan siman tipinin farklı post ve kor sistemlerinin klinik hayatta kalma oranına etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Ağustos 2016 ile Mart 2020 arasında post ve kor uygulanan hastaları gösteren elektronik tablolar üzerinde retrospektif bir analiz yapıldı. Dahil etme kriterlerine göre analize toplam 524 kayıt dahil edildi. Veriler Kaplan-Meier ve Cox orantılı risk analizi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Post ve korların hayatta kalma oranları ile yaş, restorasyon tipi, siman tipi, karşıt diş ve hizmet süresi faktörleri ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken (p<.001); diş pozisyonu ve cinsiyet faktörleri ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamadı (p>0.05). Analizler, post ve kor sağkalımı ile farklı post ve kor sistemlerinin (prefabrike cam ve karbon fiber destekli kompozit rezin, döküm metal ve prefabrike metal) önemli ölçüde ilişkili olduğuna dair bir kanıt göstermedi. Bununla birlikte, post ve kor sağkalımı ile karşıt diş, siman ve restorasyon tipi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gösterdi.

Keywords

Cam fiber, Karbon fiber, Post ve kor, Sağkalım oranı

RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT POST-AND-CORE SYSTEMS IN TEETH RESTORED WITH SINGLE CROWNS

Abstract

In this retrospective clinical study, the aim is to evaluate the effect of the clinical survival rates of different post-and-core systems in terms of the age and sex of the population, type of restoration, tooth position, type of post material, effect of opposing dentition, and type of cement used. A retrospective analysis was conducted via spreadsheets that showed patients who were treated with post-and-cores between August 2016 and March 2020. A total of 524 records were included in the analysis according to the inclusion criteria. Data were analysed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. While a statistically significant difference between the post-and-core survival among age, restoration type, cement type, opposing dentition, and service time was determined (p<0.001), a statistically significant difference with tooth position and sex was not detected (p>0.05). The analyzes showed no evidence that different post-and-core systems (prefabricated glass and carbon fiber reinforced composite resin, cast metal and prefabricated metal) were significantly associated with post-and-core survival. However, opposing dentition, type of cement, and restoration exhibited a statistically significant difference with the post-and-core survival.

Keywords

Carbon fiber, Glass fiber, Post and core, Survival rate

References

• Al-Omiri, M. K., Mahmoud, A. A., Rayyan, M. R., Abu-Hammad, O. (2010). Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview. Journal of Endodontics, 36(9),1439-1449.
• Baba, N. Z., Golden, G., Goodacre, C.J. (2009). Nonmetallic prefabricated dowels: a review of compositions, properties, laboratory, and clinical test results. Journal of Prosthodontics, 18, 527-536.
• Balkenhol, M., Wöstmann, B., Rein, C., Ferger, P. (2007). Survival time of cast post and cores: a 10-year retrospective study. Journal of Dentistry, 35(1), 50-58.
• Barfeie, A., Thomas, M. B., Watts, A., Rees, J. (2015). Failure mechanisms of fibre posts: A literature review. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 23(3), P115-27.
• Coelho, C. S., Biffi, J. C., Silva, G. R., Abrahão, A., Campos, R.E., Soares, C.J. (2009). Finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with composite resin and posts. Dental Materials Journal, 28, 671-678.
• Dammaschke, T., Nykiel, K., Sagheri, D., Schäfer, E. (2013). Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 39(2), 48-56.
• Dietschi, D., Duc, O., Krejci, I., Sadan, A. (2007). Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature--Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence International, 38, 733-743.
• Figueiredo, F. E., Martins-Filho, P. R., Faria-E-Silva, A. L. (2015). Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jounal of Endodontics, 41, 309-316.
• Fredriksson, M., Astbäck, J., Pamenius, M., Arvidson, K. (1998). A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(2), 151-157.
• Gómez-Polo, M., Llidó, B., Rivero, A., Del Río, J., Celemín, A. (2010). A 10-year retrospective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores. Journal of Dentistry, 38(11), 916-920.
• Goracci, C., Ferrari, M. (2011). Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Australian Dental Journal, 56(1), 77-83.
• Heydecke, G., Peters, M. C. (2002). The restoration of endodontically treated, single rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 87, 380-386.
• Jirathanyanatt, T., Suksaphar, W., Banomyong, D., Ngoenwiwatkul, Y. (2019). Endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with or without crown restorations: a 5-year retrospective study of survival rates from fracture. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 10(4), e12426.
• Marchionatti, A. M. E, Wandscher, V. F., Rippe, M. P., Kaizer, O. B., Valandro, L. F. (2017). Clinical performance and failure modes of pulpless teeth restored with posts: a systematic review. Brazilian Oral Research, 31, 1-14.
• Martino, N., Truong, C., Clark, A. E., O'Neill, E., Hsu, S. M., Neal, D., Esquivel-Upshaw, J. F. (2020). Retrospective analysis of survival rates of post-and-cores in a dental school setting. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 123(3), 434-441.
• Naumann, M., Preuss, A., Frankenberger, R. (2007). Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dental Materials, 23, 138-144.
• Naumann, M., Sterzenbach, G., Dietrich, T., Bitter, K., Frankenberger, R., von Stein-Lausnitz, M. (2017). Dentin-like versus rigid endodontic post: 11-year randomized controlled pilot trial on no-wall to 2-wall defects. Jornal of Endodontics, 43, 1770-1775.
• Raedel, M., Fiedler, C., Jacoby, S., Boening, K. W. (2015). Survival of teeth treated with cast post and cores: a retrospective analysis over an observation period of up to 19.5 years. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 114(1), 40-45.
• Santos, A. F., Meira, J. B., Tanaka, C. B., Xavier, T. A., Ballester, R. Y., Lima, R. G.,…Versluis A. (2010). Can fiber posts increase root stresses and reduce fracture? Journal of Dental Research, 89(6), 587-591.
• Sarkis-Onofre, R., Fergusson, D., Cenci, M.S., Moher, D., Pereira-Cenci, T. (2017). Performance of post-retained single crowns: a systematic review of related risk factors. Journal of Endodontics, 43, 175-183.
• Sarkis-Onofre, R., Jacinto, R.C., Boscato, N., Cenci, M.S., Pereira-Cenci, T. (2014). Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. Journal of Dentistry, 42, 582-7.
• Skupien, J. A., Cenci, M. S., Opdam, N. J., Kreulen, C. M., Huysmans, M. C., Pereira-Cenci, T. (2016) Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Dentistry, 48, 34-39.
• Suksaphar, W., Banomyong, D., Jirathanyanatt, T., Ngoenwiwatkul, Y. (2018). Survival rates from fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with full-coverage crowns or direct resin composite restorations: A retrospective study. Journal of Endodontics, 44(2), 233-238.
• Theodosopoulou, J. N., Chochlidakis, K.M. (2009). A systematic review of dowel (post) and core materials and systems. Journal of Prosthodontics, 18, 464-472.
• Wu, H., Hayashi, M., Okamura, K., Koytchev, E. V., Imazato, S., Tanaka, S.,… Ebisu, S. (2009). Effects of light penetration and smear layer removal on adhesion of post-cores to root canal dentin by self-etching adhesives. Dental Materials, 25(12), 1484-1492.