RIGHT LEFT DISCRIMINATION PERFORMANCE OF BODY PARTS IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SCOLIOSIS

Year 2024, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 436 - 448, 20.06.2024

Büşra Candiri Engin Ramazanoğlu Havva Adlı Burcu Talu İdris Çoban Okan Aslantürk Mehmet Ceylan

https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.1385549

Abstract

ABSTRACT
This study aimed to examine the right-left discrimination of hands, feet and back in individuals with scoliosis. In the study, right-left discrimination performance was evaluated with the mobile application called Recognize, radiographic features of scoliosis were evaluated with X-ray, degree of rotation was evaluated with the mobile application called Scoliodetector, and back pain was evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale. 25 individuals with idiopathic scoliosis were included in the analysis. In the comparison made according to the thoracolumbar and lumbar curve, no difference was found between the groups in the lateralization performances (p>0.05). In the comparison according to the type of curve, no significant difference was observed in the reaction time and accuracy rate between the groups (p>0.05). When comparing the lateralization performance according to the direction of the curve, a significant difference was found between the groups in the left foot and back reaction times (p<0.05). Weak or very weak correlations were shown between Cobb and rotation angle and lateralization measurements of the back, hand and foot. It has been shown that the location and type of the curve (C or S) does not have a significant effect on lateralization performance in individuals with idiopathic scoliosis, however, the direction of the curve may affect the discrimination of right and left.

Keywords

Cobb angle, Lateralization, Reaction time, Right-left discrimination, Scoliosis

Ethical Statement

Before starting the research, permission was obtained from the Inonu University Clinical Research Ethics Committee with approval code 2021/192.

Supporting Institution

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Thanks

We would like to thank the patients who voluntarily participated in our study.

Skolyozlu Bireylerde Vücut Parçalarının Sağ Sol Ayrım Performansı

Abstract

Bu çalışma; skolyozlu bireylerde el, ayak ve sırtın sağ-sol ayrım performansının incelenmesi amaçladı. Çalışmada sağ-sol ayrım performansı Recognize adlı mobil uygulama, skolyozun radyografik özellikleri röntgen, rotasyon derecesi Scoliodetector adlı mobil uygulama, sırt ağrısı Visual Analog Skala ile değerlendirildi. Analize idiyopatik skolyozlu 25 kişi dahil edildi. Torakolomber ve lomber eğriye göre yapılan karşılaştırmada gruplar arasında lateralizasyon performanslarında fark bulunmadı (p>0.05). Eğri tipine göre yapılan karşılaştırmada gruplar arasında reaksiyon süresi ve doğruluk oranı açısından anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi (p>0.05). Eğri yönüne göre lateralizasyon performansı karşılaştırıldığında sol ayak ve sırt reaksiyon sürelerinde gruplar arasında anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05). Cobb ve rotasyon açısı ile sırt, el ve ayağa ait lateralizasyon ölçümleri arasında zayıf ya da çok zayıf korelasyon gösterildi. İdiyopatik skolyozlu bireylerde eğriliğin yeri ve tipinin (C ya da S) lateralizasyon performansı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı ancak eğriliğin yönünün sağ-sol ayrımını etkileyebildiği gösterilmiştir.

Keywords

Cobb açısı, Lateralizasyon, Reaksiyon süresi, Sağ sol ayrımı, Skolyoz

Ethical Statement

Araştırmaya başlamadan önce İnönü Üniversitesi Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu'ndan 2021/192 onay koduyla izin alındı.

Supporting Institution

Herhangi bir kurumdan destek alınmamıştır.

Thanks

Çalışmamıza gönüllü olarak katılan katılımcılarımıza teşekkür ederiz.

References

• Altaf, F., Gibson, A., Dannawi, Z. & Noordeen, H. (2013). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bmj, 346.
• Arienti, C., Buraschi, R., Donzelli, S., Zaina, F., Pollet, J. & Negrini, S. (2019). Trunk asymmetry is associated with dominance preference: results from a cross-sectional study of 1029 children. Braz J Phys Ther, 23(4), 324-328. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.08.005
• Barton, C. B. & Weinstein, S. L. (2018). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Natural history. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis, 27-50.
• Bottino, L., Settino, M., Promenzio, L. & Cannataro, M. (2023). Scoliosis Management through Apps and Software Tools. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 20(8). doi:10.3390/ijerph20085520
• Bunnell, W. P. (1986). The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine, 11(8), 773-776.
• Carlsson, A. M. (1983). Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. J Pain, 16(1), 87-101.
• Catanzariti, J. F., Guyot, M. A., Agnani, O., Demaille, S., Kolanowski, E. & Donze, C. (2014). Eye-hand laterality and right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J, 23(6), 1232-1236. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3269-z
• Chen, Z., Qiu, Y., Ma, W., Qian, B. & Zhu, Z. (2014). Comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis without neural axis abnormalities. Spine J, 14(7), 1095-1098. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.465
• Cheng, J. C., Castelein, R. M., Chu, W. C., Danielsson, A. J., Dobbs, M. B., Grivas, T. B., …Burwell, R. G. (2015). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 1, 15030. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.30.
• Chu, W. C., Lam, W. W., Chan, Y.-l., Ng, B. K., Lam, T.-p., Lee, K.-m., ….Cheng, J. C. (2006). Relative shortening and functional tethering of spinal cord in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?: study with multiplanar reformat magnetic resonance imaging and somatosensory evoked potential. Spine, 31(1), E19-E25.
• Dobies-Krześniak, B., Werblińska, A. & Tarnacka, B. (2022). Lateralization Direction, Strength, and Consistency in Juvenile and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case Control Pilot Study. Symmetry, 14(5), 888.
• Fernandez-Bermejo, E., García-Jiménez, M. A., Fernandez-Palomeque, C. & Munuera, L. (1993). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and joint laxity. A study with somatosensory evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 18(7), 918-922. doi:10.1097/00007632-199306000-00018
• Filipovic, V. & Viskic-stalec, N. (2006). The mobility capabilities of persons with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31(19), 2237-2242. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000232821.00521.f9
• Ford, D. M., Bagnall, K. M., Clements, C. A. & McFadden, K. D. (1988). Muscle spindles in the paraspinal musculature of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 13(5), 461-465. doi:10.1097/00007632-198805000-00004
• Formaggio, E., Bertuccelli, M., Rubega, M., Di Marco, R., Cantele, F., Gottardello, F., …Masiero, S. (2022). Brain oscillatory activity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep, 12(1), 17266. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19449-1
• Grivas, T. B., Vasiliadis, E. S., Polyzois, V. D. & Mouzakis, V. (2006). Trunk asymmetry and handedness in 8245 school children. Pediatr Rehabil, 9(3), 259-266. doi:10.1080/10428190500343027
• Helmich, R. C., de Lange, F. P., Bloem, B. R. & Toni, I. (2007). Cerebral compensation during motor imagery in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2201-2215. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.024
• Joly, O., Rousié, D., Jissendi, P., Rousié, M. & Frankó, E. (2014). A new approach to corpus callosum anomalies in idiopathic scoliosis using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. European Spine Journal, 23, 2643-2649.
• Keane, A. M. (2001). Motor control of the hands: the effect of familial sinistrality. Int J Neurosci, 110 (1-2), 25-41. doi:10.3109/00207450108994219
• Kotwicki, T., Negrini, S., Grivas, T. B., Rigo, M., Maruyama, T., Durmala, J., … it, R. T. i. i. (2009). Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities-6 th SOSORT consensus paper. Scoliosis, 4, 1-16.
• Lao, M. L., Chow, D. H., Guo, X., Cheng, J. C. & Holmes, A. D. (2008). Impaired dynamic balance control in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials. J Pediatr Orthop, 28(8), 846-849. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31818e1bc9
• Linek, P., Saulicz, E., Kuszewski, M. & Wolny, T. (2017). Ultrasound Assessment of the Abdominal Muscles at Rest and During the ASLR Test Among Adolescents With Scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg, 30(4), 181-186. doi:10.1097/bsd.0000000000000055
• Mahaudens, P., Banse, X., Mousny, M. & Detrembleur, C. (2009). Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J, 18(4), 512-521. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7 Mahaudens, P., Thonnard, J. L., & Detrembleur, C. (2005). Influence of structural pelvic disorders during standing and walking in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J, 5(4), 427-433. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.014
• Nault, M. L., Allard, P., Hinse, S., Le Blanc, R., Caron, O., Labelle, H. & Sadeghi, H. (2002). Relations between standing stability and body posture parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 27(17), 1911-1917. doi:10.1097/00007632-200209010-00018
• Negrini, S., Donzelli, S., Aulisa, A. G., Czaprowski, D., Schreiber, S., de Mauroy, J. C., …Kotwicki, T. (2018). 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis and spinal disorders, 13(1), 1-48.
• Park, Y., Ko, J. Y., Jang, J. Y., Lee, S., Beom, J. & Ryu, J. S. (2021). Asymmetrical activation and asymmetrical weakness as two different mechanisms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep, 11(1), 17582. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96882-8
• Pelletier, R., Higgins, J. & Bourbonnais, D. (2018). Laterality recognition of images, motor performance, and aspects related to pain in participants with and without wrist/hand disorders: An observational cross-sectional study. Musculoskeletal Science Practice, 35, 18-24.
• Sahlstrand, T., Ortengren, R. & Nachemson, A. (1978). Postural equilibrium in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand, 49(4), 354-365. doi:10.3109/17453677809050088
• Schmid, A. B. & Coppieters, M. W. (2012). Left/right judgment of body parts is selectively impaired in patients with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. The Clinical journal of pain, 28(7), 615-622. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31823e16b9
• Shi, L., Wang, D., Chu, W. C., Burwell, R. G., Freeman, B. J., Heng, P. A. &Cheng, J. C. (2009). Volume-based morphometry of brain MR images in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and healthy control subjects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 30(7), 1302-1307. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1577
• Simoneau, M., Lamothe, V., Hutin, E., Mercier, P., Teasdale, N. & Blouin, J. (2009). Evidence for cognitive vestibular integration impairment in idiopathic scoliosis patients. BMC Neurosci, 10, 102. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-102
• Steenbergen, B., van Nimwegen, M. & Crajé, C. (2007). Solving a mental rotation task in congenital hemiparesis: motor imagery versus visual imagery. Neuropsychologia, 45(14), 3324-3328. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.002
• Szameitat, A. J., Shen, S. & Sterr, A. (2007). Motor imagery of complex everyday movements. An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 34(2), 702-713. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.033
• Whittle, M. & Evans, M. (1979). Instrument for measuring the Cobb angle in scoliosis. The Lancet, 313(8113), 414.
• Yang, Z. D. & Li, M. (2011). There may be a same mechanism of the left-right handedness and left-right convex curve pattern of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Hypotheses, 76(2), 274-276. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.10.021