Bu çalışmada, 4-aminoantipirin(4AAP) türevi Schiff bazları sentezlendi ve bu moleküllerin yapıları spektroskopik yöntemlerle (1H- ve 13C-NMR) aydınlatıldı. Literatürde ilk kez sentezlenen bu moleküllerin antioksidan potansiyelleri, DPPH- (1,1-difenil-2-pikrilhidrazil) serbest radikal süpürücü etkisi, 2,2'-azino-bis(3-etilbenztiazolin-6-sülfonik asit) (ABTS) radikal süpürücü aktivitesi ve bakır iyon indirgeyici antioksidan kapasitesi (CUPRAC) analizi ile araştırıldı. Daha sonra kolinesterazlara (ChE) karşı inhibitör potansiyelleri incelendi. Enzim inhibisyon çalışmalarında, (4E)-4-(5-kloro-2-hidroksibenzilidenamino)-1,2-dihidro-2,3-dimetil-1-fenilpirazol-5-on (R3) bileşikleri, 27,05±0,13 µM inhibisyon değeriyle, standart inhibitör Neostigmin'in 33,3 ± 0,32 µM değerine kıyasla daha yüksek bir inhibisyon etkisi gösterdi. Daha sonra antioksidan yöntemler DPPH, ABTS ve CUPRAC analiz edildi. DPPH testinde, (4E)-4-(2-hidroksi-5-nitrobenzilidenamino)-1,2-dihidro-2,3-dimetil-1-fenilpirazol-5-on (R5) molekülü, 116,79±2,73 µM ile en iyi aktiviteyi gösterdi. Ancak bu deney yönteminde tüm moleküller standart antioksidanlardan (bütilhidroksianisol (BHA), bütillenmiş hidroksitoluen (BHT) ve alfa-tokoferol (α-TOC)) daha iyi sonuçlar vermedi. ABTS yönteminde sentezlenen tüm moleküller standart antioksidanlar BHA ve α-TOC ile karşılaştırıldığında iyi aktivite gösterdi. R3 molekülü en iyi aktiviteyi gösterdi. CUPRAC yönteminde ise tüm moleküller antioksidan aktivite göstermesine rağmen standart antioksidanlar kadar iyi değildi. (4E)-4-(2-hidroksibenzilidenamino)-1,2-dihidro-2,3-dimetil-1-fenilpirazol-5-on (R1) molekülü aktif molekül olarak en iyi aktiviteyi gösterdi.
In this study, Schiff bases derived from 4-aminoantipyrine (4AAP) were synthesized and elucidated using spectroscopic methods (¹H- and ¹³C-NMR). DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging test, 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging activity, and copper ion reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) analysis were used to evaluate Schiff bases’ antioxidant potentials. Furthermore, their inhibitory potentials against cholinesterase (ChE) enzymes were investigated. The compound (4E)-4-(5-chloro-2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)-1,2-dihydro-2,3-dimethyl-1-phenylpyrazol-5-one (R3) exhibited a higher inhibition effect with an inhibitory value of 27.05 ± 0.13 µM as compared to the standard inhibitor neostigmine (33.3 ± 0.32 µM). The synthesized compounds were subjected to antioxidant tests, including DPPH, ABTS, and CUPRAC, respectively. In the DPPH experiment, the compound (4E)-4-(2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzylideneamino)-1,2-dihydro-2,3-dimethyl-1-phenylpyrazol-5-one (R5) exhibited activity with a value of 116.79 ± 2.73 µM. However, in this test, all compounds showed lower antioxidant activity as compared to standard antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and α-tocopherol (α-TOC). By contrast, in the ABTS assay, all compounds were active as compared to standard antioxidants, and the R3 compound showed high antioxidant activity. In the CUPRAC experiment, although the compounds showed antioxidant activity, it was not as high as that of the standard antioxidants. (4E) -4-(2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)-1,2-dihydro-2,3-dimethyl-1-phenylpyrazol-5-one (R1) compound was the most effective in the CUPRAC method.
There is no need for ethics committee approval for our research article.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Public Health (Other) |
Journal Section | Araştırma Makalesi |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | October 6, 2025 |
Publication Date | October 8, 2025 |
Submission Date | February 18, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | August 26, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 13 Issue: 3 |