BibTex RIS Cite

Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites

Year 2012, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 73 - 76, 01.06.2012

Abstract

References

  • Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in 2003;134:1382-90. J Am Dent Assoc.
  • Roulet IE and Walti C. Influence of oral fluid in composite resin and glass-ionomer cement. Prosthet Dent1984; 52: 182-187.
  • Yap AU, Teoh SH and Tan KB. Influence of water exposure on three body wear of composite restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 547-553.
  • Sarkar NK. Internal corrosion in dental composite wear. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 371-80.
  • Braden M. and Clarke R.L.: Water absorption characteristics of dental microfine composite filling materials. Biomaterials. 1984; 5: 369–372.
  • Söderholm K.J. Zigan M, Ragan M., Fischlschweiger W. and
  • Bergman M., Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984; 63: 1248–1254.
  • Oysaed H. and Ruyter I.E., Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986; 20: 261–271.
  • El-Hadary A. and Drummond J.L., Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 356–361.
  • Mohsen N.M and Craig R.G, Hydrolytic stability of silanated zirconia–silica–urethane dimethacrylate composites. J Oral Rehabilit 1995; 22: 213–220.
  • Peutzfeldt A and Asmussen E, Influence of ketones on selected mechanical properties of resin composites. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1847–1850.
  • The ADA division of science on behalf of the ADA council on scientific affairs: Resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 4; 510-13.
  • International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049: Dentistry polymer – based filling, restorative and luting materials. Switzerland, 2000.
  • Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and dimethacrylatebased dental resins. Biomaterials. 2003;24:655- of 65. elasticity of light-cured
  • Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W,
  • Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res, 1984;63:1248-54.
  • Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M: Characterization of water sorption, solubility and filler particles of light-cured composite resins. Braz Dent J , 2009; 4:314-318.
  • Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater, 2006; 22: 973-80.
  • Kalachandra S, Wilson TW. Water sorption and mechanical properties of light-cured proprietary composite tooth restorative materials. Biomaterials. 1992;13:105-9.
  • Santos C, Clarke RL, Braden M, Guitian F, Davy KWM. Water absorption characteristics of dental composites incorporating hydroxyapatite filler. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1897-1904.
  • Da Silva EM , Almeida GS, Poskus LT, Guimarães JG:
  • Relationship between the degree of conversion, solubility and salivary sorption of a hybrid and a nanofilled Resin composite: influence of the light-activation mode. J App Oral Sci, 2008; 2:161-6.

Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites

Year 2012, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 73 - 76, 01.06.2012

Abstract

References

  • Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in 2003;134:1382-90. J Am Dent Assoc.
  • Roulet IE and Walti C. Influence of oral fluid in composite resin and glass-ionomer cement. Prosthet Dent1984; 52: 182-187.
  • Yap AU, Teoh SH and Tan KB. Influence of water exposure on three body wear of composite restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 547-553.
  • Sarkar NK. Internal corrosion in dental composite wear. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 371-80.
  • Braden M. and Clarke R.L.: Water absorption characteristics of dental microfine composite filling materials. Biomaterials. 1984; 5: 369–372.
  • Söderholm K.J. Zigan M, Ragan M., Fischlschweiger W. and
  • Bergman M., Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984; 63: 1248–1254.
  • Oysaed H. and Ruyter I.E., Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986; 20: 261–271.
  • El-Hadary A. and Drummond J.L., Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 356–361.
  • Mohsen N.M and Craig R.G, Hydrolytic stability of silanated zirconia–silica–urethane dimethacrylate composites. J Oral Rehabilit 1995; 22: 213–220.
  • Peutzfeldt A and Asmussen E, Influence of ketones on selected mechanical properties of resin composites. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1847–1850.
  • The ADA division of science on behalf of the ADA council on scientific affairs: Resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 4; 510-13.
  • International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049: Dentistry polymer – based filling, restorative and luting materials. Switzerland, 2000.
  • Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and dimethacrylatebased dental resins. Biomaterials. 2003;24:655- of 65. elasticity of light-cured
  • Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W,
  • Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res, 1984;63:1248-54.
  • Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M: Characterization of water sorption, solubility and filler particles of light-cured composite resins. Braz Dent J , 2009; 4:314-318.
  • Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater, 2006; 22: 973-80.
  • Kalachandra S, Wilson TW. Water sorption and mechanical properties of light-cured proprietary composite tooth restorative materials. Biomaterials. 1992;13:105-9.
  • Santos C, Clarke RL, Braden M, Guitian F, Davy KWM. Water absorption characteristics of dental composites incorporating hydroxyapatite filler. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1897-1904.
  • Da Silva EM , Almeida GS, Poskus LT, Guimarães JG:
  • Relationship between the degree of conversion, solubility and salivary sorption of a hybrid and a nanofilled Resin composite: influence of the light-activation mode. J App Oral Sci, 2008; 2:161-6.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ali A. Razooki Alshekhli This is me

Sahar M. Amin Hakimzadeh This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Alshekhli, A. A. R., & Hakimzadeh, S. M. A. (2012). Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research, 5(2), 73-76.
AMA Alshekhli AAR, Hakimzadeh SMA. Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites. JIDMR. June 2012;5(2):73-76.
Chicago Alshekhli, Ali A. Razooki, and Sahar M. Amin Hakimzadeh. “Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites”. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research 5, no. 2 (June 2012): 73-76.
EndNote Alshekhli AAR, Hakimzadeh SMA (June 1, 2012) Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research 5 2 73–76.
IEEE A. A. R. Alshekhli and S. M. A. Hakimzadeh, “Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites”, JIDMR, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73–76, 2012.
ISNAD Alshekhli, Ali A. Razooki - Hakimzadeh, Sahar M. Amin. “Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites”. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research 5/2 (June 2012), 73-76.
JAMA Alshekhli AAR, Hakimzadeh SMA. Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites. JIDMR. 2012;5:73–76.
MLA Alshekhli, Ali A. Razooki and Sahar M. Amin Hakimzadeh. “Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites”. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research, vol. 5, no. 2, 2012, pp. 73-76.
Vancouver Alshekhli AAR, Hakimzadeh SMA. Sorption of Nanofilled Versus Other Conventional Composites. JIDMR. 2012;5(2):73-6.