Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks

Year 2017, , 61 - 70, 31.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.354210

Abstract


The development
and spread of Internet technologies made an important breakthrough in
communication between people. Social networks are regarded as a virtual way of
social life created by people via the Internet. With the help of these
networks, individuals define themselves and communicate with other people from
the same cultural background thanks to the opportunities provided by the
Internet. It is important to reveal the rate of university students’ use of
social networks, which have the capability of guiding societies and their
future. Determining which social networks pre-service teachers prefer and how
often and why they use these social networks will help better-understand the
concept of social network. This study was carried out with 566 pre-service teachers
attending Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty at Dicle University. In the study, the
descriptive relational survey model was used. As a result of analysis of the
research data, it was found out that 73,50% of the students had social network
accounts. It was also revealed that the students with a social network account
established connection generally with their friends via their own accounts
(59,1%). In addition, the Fisher Exact test revealed that the preservice
teachers’ social network use time depended on the number of their friends they
communicated with via social network and that there were relationships between
the individuals the preservice teachers communicated with and the duration of
their being social network users and between the individuals they communicated
with and the duration of their being social network users.

References

  • Awodele, O., Idowu, S., Anjorin, O., Adedire, A. and Akpore, V. (2009). University Enhancement System Using a Social Networking Approach, Extending E-learning, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Volume 6.
  • Bulent, B., Murat, Y., & Selahattin, G. (2016). Attitude scale towards web-based examination system (MOODLE)-Validity and reliability study. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(17), 1641.
  • Brown, A. (2008). Educational Uses of Facebook, Conference on Information Technology in Salt Lake City, Utah, Paper presented at 2008, URL-1: http://cit.ceu.edu/mat/t/t26.pdf
  • Blackey, H. & Chew, E. (2009) Social Software Policy 2009–2012 for The University of Glamorgan. The Policy of the University of Glamorgan.
  • Boyd M. D. & Ellison, B. N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship, URL -2:http://consommacteurs.blogs.com/files/socialne tworksites_boyd-ellision_2007.pdf
  • Çepni, S. (2010). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfeld, C., and Lampe, C. (2006). Spatially Bounded Online Social Networks and Social Capital: The Role of Facebook. Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), June 19-23 Dresden, Germany.
  • ET, Ö. (2008). Sosyal Ağ Sitelerinin Reklam ve Halkla İlişkilerOrtamlari. Journal of Yasar University, 3(9), 1111-1143.
  • Genç, Z. (2010). Web 2.0 Yeniliklerinin Eğitimde Kullanımı: Bir Facebook Eğitim Uygulama Örneği. Akademik Bilişim, 10, 10-12.
  • Griffith, S. and Liyanage, L. (2008). An Introduction to the Potential of Social Networking Sites in Education, Emerging Technologies Conference, volume: 9.
  • Gonzales, L. & Vodicka, D. (2010). Top Ten Internet Resources for Educators’, Leadership, 32-37.
  • Hablemitoğlu, Ş. & Yıldırım, F. (2012).Gençlerin Gözünden Sanal Bir Sosyal Kapital Olarak “Facebook”, Ankara Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 1-20
  • Hamburger, E. (2014, July 23). Facebook's New Stats: 1.32 Billion Users, 30 Percent Only Use it on Their Phone. The Verge. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/ 2014/7/23/5930743/facebooks-new-stats-1-32-billion-users-per-month-30- percent-only-use-it-on-their-phones.
  • Haverback, H. R. (2009). Facebook: Uncharted Territory in a Reading Education Classroom. Reading Today, 27(2).
  • Haverback, H. R. (2009). Facebook: Uncharted Territory in a Reading Education Classroom, Reading Today, pp. 34.
  • Johnston, K., Tanner, M., Lalla, N., & Kawalski, D. (2013). Social Capital: the Benefit of Facebook ‘Friends’. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 24-36.
  • Karataş, S. (2010). Eğitimde Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin Kullanımda Yaratıcı Öneriler, Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu II 16–18 Mayıs 2010 – Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Beytepe-ANKARA,109.
  • Kobak, K. & Biçer, S. (2008). Facebook Sosyal Paylaşım Sitesinin Kullanım Nedenleri, 8th International EducationTechnology Conference, 567-571.
  • Levy, S. (2007). Are MySpace Users Now Spacing Out? Newsweek, 149, (22), p. 26; Ronn, K. Social Networking: Closer Than You Think. Business Week Online, 12, 2007
  • Kalafat, Ö. and Göktaş, Y. (2011). Sosyal Ağların Yükseköğretimde Kullanımı: Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Facebook Örneği, 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 September 2011, Fırat University, ELAZIĞ- TURKEY
  • Karademir, T. & Alper, A. (2011). Öğrenme Ortamı Olarak Sosyal Ağlarda Bulunması Gereken Standartlar, 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 September, Fırat University, Elazığ- Turkey.
  • Magogwe, J. M., Ntereke, B., & Phetlhe, K. R. (2015). Facebook and Classroom Group Work: A Trial Study Involving University of Botswana Advanced Oral Presentation Students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 1312–1323.
  • Moghavvemi, S., & Salarzadeh Janatabadi, H. (2017). Incremental Impact of Time on Students' Use of Elearning Via Facebook. British Journal of Educational Technology.
  • Muñoz, C. L., & Towner, T. L., (2009). ‘Opening Facebook: How to Use Facebook in the College Classroom’. Paper presented at 2009, Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education conference in Charleston, South Carolina, URL-3: http://www46.homepage.villanova.edu/john.immerwahr/TP101/Facebook.pdf
  • Muscanell, L., N. & Guadagno, E., R. (2012). Make New Friends or Keep the Old: Gender and Personality Differences in Social Networking Use, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 107–112
  • Nielsen, Wire. (2011). Friends, following and feedback: How We’re Using Social Media. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2011/ friends-following-and-feedback-how-were-using-social-media.html.
  • Pascu, C. (2008). An Empirical Analysis of the Creation, Use and Adoption of Social Computing Applications (EUR 23415 EN). IPTS Exploratory Research on the Socio-economic Impact of Social Computing. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), JRC, European Commission. URL-4:http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications /pub.cfm?id=1684 (Erişim tarihi: 3 Nisan 2010)
  • Peluchette, J. & Karl, K. (2010). Examining Students’ Intended Image on Facebook:“What Were They Thinking?!”, Journal Of Educatıon For Busıness, 85: 30–37.
  • Rayn, D. S., Margo, J. M. & Sharp, H. J. (2011). Exploring Educational and Cultural Adaptation through Social Networking Sites, Journal of Information Technology Education, Volume 10.
  • Solmaz, B., Tekin, G., Herzem, Z., & Demir, M. (2013). İnternet ve Sosyal Medya Kullanimi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 7(4), 23-32.
  • Tiryakioğlu, F. and Erzurum, F. (2011). Bir Eğitim Aracı Olarak Ağların Kullanımı, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 27-29 April, 2011 Antalya-Turkey.
  • Vigil, J. M. (2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18(2), 143-161.
  • Wang, Q., Woo, H.L., Quek, C.L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Study, 43, 428–438.
  • Wang, S. S., Moon, S. I., Kwon, K. H., Evans, C. A., & Stefanone, M. A. (2010). Faceoff: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 226-234.
  • YALMAN, M. (2013). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Destekli Uzaktan Eğitim Sistemi (Moodle) Memnuniyet Düzeyleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(8).
  • Yalman, M. (2015). Education faculty students' views about use of e-books. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(1).
  • Yalman, M., Gönen, S. and Başaran, B. (2011). High School Last Grade Students’ Internet Usage Situation and Their Attitudes Toward Internet; Diyarbakır sample, III Uluslararası Türkiye Eğitim Araştırma Kongresi, Girne, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus 4-7May, 104-119.
  • https:/tr-tr.facebook.com/...facebook-türkiye-istatistikleri/230108337030128

Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks

Year 2017, , 61 - 70, 31.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.354210

Abstract


The development
and spread of Internet technologies made an important breakthrough in
communication between people. Social networks are regarded as a virtual way of
social life created by people via the Internet. With the help of these
networks, individuals define themselves and communicate with other people from
the same cultural background thanks to the opportunities provided by the
Internet. It is important to reveal the rate of university students’ use of
social networks, which have the capability of guiding societies and their
future. Determining which social networks pre-service teachers prefer and how
often and why they use these social networks will help better-understand the
concept of social network. This study was carried out with 566 pre-service teachers
attending Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty at Dicle University. In the study, the
descriptive relational survey model was used. As a result of analysis of the
research data, it was found out that 73,50% of the students had social network
accounts. It was also revealed that the students with a social network account
established connection generally with their friends via their own accounts
(59,1%). In addition, the Fisher Exact test revealed that the preservice
teachers’ social network use time depended on the number of their friends they
communicated with via social network and that there were relationships between
the individuals the preservice teachers communicated with and the duration of
their being social network users and between the individuals they communicated
with and the duration of their being social network users.

References

  • Awodele, O., Idowu, S., Anjorin, O., Adedire, A. and Akpore, V. (2009). University Enhancement System Using a Social Networking Approach, Extending E-learning, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Volume 6.
  • Bulent, B., Murat, Y., & Selahattin, G. (2016). Attitude scale towards web-based examination system (MOODLE)-Validity and reliability study. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(17), 1641.
  • Brown, A. (2008). Educational Uses of Facebook, Conference on Information Technology in Salt Lake City, Utah, Paper presented at 2008, URL-1: http://cit.ceu.edu/mat/t/t26.pdf
  • Blackey, H. & Chew, E. (2009) Social Software Policy 2009–2012 for The University of Glamorgan. The Policy of the University of Glamorgan.
  • Boyd M. D. & Ellison, B. N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship, URL -2:http://consommacteurs.blogs.com/files/socialne tworksites_boyd-ellision_2007.pdf
  • Çepni, S. (2010). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfeld, C., and Lampe, C. (2006). Spatially Bounded Online Social Networks and Social Capital: The Role of Facebook. Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), June 19-23 Dresden, Germany.
  • ET, Ö. (2008). Sosyal Ağ Sitelerinin Reklam ve Halkla İlişkilerOrtamlari. Journal of Yasar University, 3(9), 1111-1143.
  • Genç, Z. (2010). Web 2.0 Yeniliklerinin Eğitimde Kullanımı: Bir Facebook Eğitim Uygulama Örneği. Akademik Bilişim, 10, 10-12.
  • Griffith, S. and Liyanage, L. (2008). An Introduction to the Potential of Social Networking Sites in Education, Emerging Technologies Conference, volume: 9.
  • Gonzales, L. & Vodicka, D. (2010). Top Ten Internet Resources for Educators’, Leadership, 32-37.
  • Hablemitoğlu, Ş. & Yıldırım, F. (2012).Gençlerin Gözünden Sanal Bir Sosyal Kapital Olarak “Facebook”, Ankara Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 1-20
  • Hamburger, E. (2014, July 23). Facebook's New Stats: 1.32 Billion Users, 30 Percent Only Use it on Their Phone. The Verge. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/ 2014/7/23/5930743/facebooks-new-stats-1-32-billion-users-per-month-30- percent-only-use-it-on-their-phones.
  • Haverback, H. R. (2009). Facebook: Uncharted Territory in a Reading Education Classroom. Reading Today, 27(2).
  • Haverback, H. R. (2009). Facebook: Uncharted Territory in a Reading Education Classroom, Reading Today, pp. 34.
  • Johnston, K., Tanner, M., Lalla, N., & Kawalski, D. (2013). Social Capital: the Benefit of Facebook ‘Friends’. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 24-36.
  • Karataş, S. (2010). Eğitimde Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin Kullanımda Yaratıcı Öneriler, Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu II 16–18 Mayıs 2010 – Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Beytepe-ANKARA,109.
  • Kobak, K. & Biçer, S. (2008). Facebook Sosyal Paylaşım Sitesinin Kullanım Nedenleri, 8th International EducationTechnology Conference, 567-571.
  • Levy, S. (2007). Are MySpace Users Now Spacing Out? Newsweek, 149, (22), p. 26; Ronn, K. Social Networking: Closer Than You Think. Business Week Online, 12, 2007
  • Kalafat, Ö. and Göktaş, Y. (2011). Sosyal Ağların Yükseköğretimde Kullanımı: Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Facebook Örneği, 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 September 2011, Fırat University, ELAZIĞ- TURKEY
  • Karademir, T. & Alper, A. (2011). Öğrenme Ortamı Olarak Sosyal Ağlarda Bulunması Gereken Standartlar, 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 September, Fırat University, Elazığ- Turkey.
  • Magogwe, J. M., Ntereke, B., & Phetlhe, K. R. (2015). Facebook and Classroom Group Work: A Trial Study Involving University of Botswana Advanced Oral Presentation Students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 1312–1323.
  • Moghavvemi, S., & Salarzadeh Janatabadi, H. (2017). Incremental Impact of Time on Students' Use of Elearning Via Facebook. British Journal of Educational Technology.
  • Muñoz, C. L., & Towner, T. L., (2009). ‘Opening Facebook: How to Use Facebook in the College Classroom’. Paper presented at 2009, Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education conference in Charleston, South Carolina, URL-3: http://www46.homepage.villanova.edu/john.immerwahr/TP101/Facebook.pdf
  • Muscanell, L., N. & Guadagno, E., R. (2012). Make New Friends or Keep the Old: Gender and Personality Differences in Social Networking Use, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 107–112
  • Nielsen, Wire. (2011). Friends, following and feedback: How We’re Using Social Media. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2011/ friends-following-and-feedback-how-were-using-social-media.html.
  • Pascu, C. (2008). An Empirical Analysis of the Creation, Use and Adoption of Social Computing Applications (EUR 23415 EN). IPTS Exploratory Research on the Socio-economic Impact of Social Computing. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), JRC, European Commission. URL-4:http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications /pub.cfm?id=1684 (Erişim tarihi: 3 Nisan 2010)
  • Peluchette, J. & Karl, K. (2010). Examining Students’ Intended Image on Facebook:“What Were They Thinking?!”, Journal Of Educatıon For Busıness, 85: 30–37.
  • Rayn, D. S., Margo, J. M. & Sharp, H. J. (2011). Exploring Educational and Cultural Adaptation through Social Networking Sites, Journal of Information Technology Education, Volume 10.
  • Solmaz, B., Tekin, G., Herzem, Z., & Demir, M. (2013). İnternet ve Sosyal Medya Kullanimi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 7(4), 23-32.
  • Tiryakioğlu, F. and Erzurum, F. (2011). Bir Eğitim Aracı Olarak Ağların Kullanımı, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 27-29 April, 2011 Antalya-Turkey.
  • Vigil, J. M. (2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18(2), 143-161.
  • Wang, Q., Woo, H.L., Quek, C.L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Study, 43, 428–438.
  • Wang, S. S., Moon, S. I., Kwon, K. H., Evans, C. A., & Stefanone, M. A. (2010). Faceoff: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 226-234.
  • YALMAN, M. (2013). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Destekli Uzaktan Eğitim Sistemi (Moodle) Memnuniyet Düzeyleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(8).
  • Yalman, M. (2015). Education faculty students' views about use of e-books. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(1).
  • Yalman, M., Gönen, S. and Başaran, B. (2011). High School Last Grade Students’ Internet Usage Situation and Their Attitudes Toward Internet; Diyarbakır sample, III Uluslararası Türkiye Eğitim Araştırma Kongresi, Girne, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus 4-7May, 104-119.
  • https:/tr-tr.facebook.com/...facebook-türkiye-istatistikleri/230108337030128
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Murat Yalman

Bülent Başaran

Selahattin Gonen This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Yalman, M., Başaran, B., & Gonen, S. (2017). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.354210
AMA Yalman M, Başaran B, Gonen S. Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks. INUEFD. December 2017;18(3):61-70. doi:10.17679/inuefd.354210
Chicago Yalman, Murat, Bülent Başaran, and Selahattin Gonen. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks”. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 18, no. 3 (December 2017): 61-70. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.354210.
EndNote Yalman M, Başaran B, Gonen S (December 1, 2017) Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 18 3 61–70.
IEEE M. Yalman, B. Başaran, and S. Gonen, “Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks”, INUEFD, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 61–70, 2017, doi: 10.17679/inuefd.354210.
ISNAD Yalman, Murat et al. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks”. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 18/3 (December 2017), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.354210.
JAMA Yalman M, Başaran B, Gonen S. Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks. INUEFD. 2017;18:61–70.
MLA Yalman, Murat et al. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks”. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 3, 2017, pp. 61-70, doi:10.17679/inuefd.354210.
Vancouver Yalman M, Başaran B, Gonen S. Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about the Use of Social Networks. INUEFD. 2017;18(3):61-70.

2002 INUEFD  Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.