BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya'da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 835 - 876, 13.07.2016

Öz

İdare hukukuna özgü idari yaptırım ve tedbirler, çevrenin korunması bakımından etkili araçlar arasında yer almaktadır. İdare hukukunun dinamik özelliği, güncel çevre sorunlarına karşı hızlı tepkiler üretebilmesi, yaptırım stratejilerinde benimsenen ilkeler idari yaptırımları, çevreyi geliştirmeyi ve korumayı görev edinen ülkeler için vazgeçilmez kılmaktadır. İdare hukuku ile çevre sorunsalı arasındaki illiyet bağına binaen, ülkeler farklı yaptırım ve tedbir türleri benimseyerek, idarelerini yetkilendirmişlerdir. Anglo sakson ülkeleri arasında sayılan Avustralya açısından bakıldığında da yerel, eyalet ve federal düzeyde uygulanan idari yaptırımlar, esas alınan bazı ilkeler doğrultusunda örnek oluşturabilecek türdendir. Bütünleştirme ihtiyacı, ihlallerin derecelendirilmesi ve birim sistemi gibi uygulama esaslarını geliştirme çabasında olan Avustralya’da mali nitelikte olan ve olmayan idari yaptırımlar, çevresel etkin bir koruma oluşturmaktadırlar

Kaynakça

  • Andrew Haesler, Andrew Miles, The Law Handbook (Your Practical Guide to The Law in NSW), 11 th Edition, Section : Criminal Law, Redfern Legal Centre Publishing
  • Andrew Harman, “Pollution Abatement Notices: The Requirement for Certainty”, Environmental and Planning Law Journal, Vol. 12 No:2, April 1995
  • Angela Hartley, “Are Criminal Penalties the Most Effective Sanction for Offences Under Pt V of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA)?”, Environmental and Planning Journal 21, 2004
  • Anthony Ogus, Carolyn Abbot, “Protection and Penalties”, Presented at the Symposium on Law and Economics of Environmental Policy, University College London, September 2001
  • Ben Boer, “Environmental and Resource Law in Australia”, Symposium Towards to 21st Century: CanadianAustralian Legal Perspectives, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Volume 31, 1993
  • Brian Robinson, “Review of the Enforcement and Prosecution Guidelines of the Department of Environmental Protection of Western Australia”, This Report is prepared for The Minister for Environment and Heritage, 2003
  • Carolyn Abbot, “The Regulatory Enforcement of Pollution Control Laws: The Australian Experience”, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 17, No: 2, Oxford, 2005
  • Carolyn Abbott, Enforcing Pollution Control Regulation: Strengthening Sanctions and Improving Deterrence, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2009
  • Christine Parker, “Restorative Justice in Business Regulation? The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s Use of Enforceable Undertakings”, Modern Law Review, Vol. 62 No. 2
  • Department of The Environment, Water, Heritage & The Arts (DEWHA), “Compliance and Enforcement Policy”, 2009
  • Department of The Environment, Water, Heritage & The Arts (DEWHA), “Compliance and Enforcement Policy”, 2009
  • Dixon Thompson-Melvin Wilson, “Environmental Auditing: Theory and Applications”, Environmental Management Vol. 18, No 4, 1994
  • Donald Anton, Jenifier Kohout, Nicola Pain, “Nationalizing Environmental Protection in Australia: The International Dimensions”, Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3
  • Environmental Protection Agency, A Study on the Use of Administrative Sanctions for Environmental Offences in Other Comparable Countries and Assessment of Their Possible Use in Ireland, Prepared by Alison Fanagan-Orla Joyce, EPA Publication, 2009
  • Environmental Protection Agency, A Study on the Use of Administrative Sanctions for Environmental Offences in Other Comparable Countries and Assessment of Their Possible Use in Ireland, Prepared by Alison Fanagan-Orla Joyce, EPA Publication, 2009
  • Günter Heine, “Elaboration of Norms and Protection of the Environment”, Duke-Environmental Law Policy Forum, Volume II, North Carolina, 1992 Harwood, Stephenson. “Comparative Analysis of Administrative & Civil Sanctions in other Jurisdictions”, September 2007
  • Ian Ayres; John Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992
  • İbrahim Kaboğlu, “Dayanışma Haklarının Hukuksal Değeri (Soyut Talepler mi? İnsan Hakları mı?)”, İnsan hakları Yıllığı, Cilt 13, Ankara, 1991
  • Jennifer Norberry, “Australian Pollution Laws: Offences, Penalties and Regulatory Agencies”, in Australian Institute of Criminology Conference Proceedings, No: 26, Environmental Crime: Proceedings of a Conference held 1-3 September 1993
  • Per Hunt CJ in EPA & n (1992) 26 NSWLR 352. Cited in G. Bates, Environmental Law in Australia, 5th Edition, Butterworths LexisNexis, Australia, 2002
  • Peter Grabosky, John Braithwaite, Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies, Oxford University Pres, Oxford, 1986
  • Principled Regulation: Federal Civil and Administrative Penalties in Australia (ALRC Report 95), published by Australian Law Reform Commission Richard Fox, “Criminal Sanctions at the Other End”, paper presented at 3rd National Outlook Symposium on Crime In Australia: Mapping the Boundaries of Australia’s Criminal Justice System, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 1999
  • Richard Fox, “Infringement Notices: Time for Reform”, Australian Institute of Criminology Trends&Issues, No:50, November 1995
  • Richard Johnstone-Christine Parker, “Enforceable Undertakings in Action: Report of a Roundtable Discussion with Australian Regulators”, Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 464, 2010
  • Samantha Bricknell, Environmental Crime in Australia, AIC Reports Research and Public Policy Series 109, Published by Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 2010
  • Steven Shavel, “The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 36 No. 1 Part 2, 1993
  • Taytak Mustafa ve Meçik Oytun, “Küresel Çevre Sorunlarına Karşı Uluslararası Yeşil Diyalog”, Uluslararası Davraz Kongresi, 24-27 Eylül 2009, ss. 251-264

Administrative Sanctions For Environmental Protection in Australia

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 835 - 876, 13.07.2016

Öz

Administrative sanctions and precautions pertaining to the administration of law, are among the effective tools for the protection of the environment. Dynamic feature of administrative law, production of quick responses to current environmental issues, adopted principles of sanction strategies make administrative sanctions indispensable for countries that are committed to develop and protect the environment. According to causal link between the administration law and environmental issues, countries are authorized their governments by adopting different types of sanctions and precautions. In terms of Australia that is one of the Anglo-Saxon countries, administrative sanctions applied in local, state and federal levels are such an example can be taken on the basis of principles basis. Financial and non-financial administrative sanctions constitute and effective environmental protection in Australia that is in effort of improvement for the implementation fundamentals of integration requirements, grading violations and the unit system

Kaynakça

  • Andrew Haesler, Andrew Miles, The Law Handbook (Your Practical Guide to The Law in NSW), 11 th Edition, Section : Criminal Law, Redfern Legal Centre Publishing
  • Andrew Harman, “Pollution Abatement Notices: The Requirement for Certainty”, Environmental and Planning Law Journal, Vol. 12 No:2, April 1995
  • Angela Hartley, “Are Criminal Penalties the Most Effective Sanction for Offences Under Pt V of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA)?”, Environmental and Planning Journal 21, 2004
  • Anthony Ogus, Carolyn Abbot, “Protection and Penalties”, Presented at the Symposium on Law and Economics of Environmental Policy, University College London, September 2001
  • Ben Boer, “Environmental and Resource Law in Australia”, Symposium Towards to 21st Century: CanadianAustralian Legal Perspectives, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Volume 31, 1993
  • Brian Robinson, “Review of the Enforcement and Prosecution Guidelines of the Department of Environmental Protection of Western Australia”, This Report is prepared for The Minister for Environment and Heritage, 2003
  • Carolyn Abbot, “The Regulatory Enforcement of Pollution Control Laws: The Australian Experience”, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 17, No: 2, Oxford, 2005
  • Carolyn Abbott, Enforcing Pollution Control Regulation: Strengthening Sanctions and Improving Deterrence, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2009
  • Christine Parker, “Restorative Justice in Business Regulation? The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s Use of Enforceable Undertakings”, Modern Law Review, Vol. 62 No. 2
  • Department of The Environment, Water, Heritage & The Arts (DEWHA), “Compliance and Enforcement Policy”, 2009
  • Department of The Environment, Water, Heritage & The Arts (DEWHA), “Compliance and Enforcement Policy”, 2009
  • Dixon Thompson-Melvin Wilson, “Environmental Auditing: Theory and Applications”, Environmental Management Vol. 18, No 4, 1994
  • Donald Anton, Jenifier Kohout, Nicola Pain, “Nationalizing Environmental Protection in Australia: The International Dimensions”, Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3
  • Environmental Protection Agency, A Study on the Use of Administrative Sanctions for Environmental Offences in Other Comparable Countries and Assessment of Their Possible Use in Ireland, Prepared by Alison Fanagan-Orla Joyce, EPA Publication, 2009
  • Environmental Protection Agency, A Study on the Use of Administrative Sanctions for Environmental Offences in Other Comparable Countries and Assessment of Their Possible Use in Ireland, Prepared by Alison Fanagan-Orla Joyce, EPA Publication, 2009
  • Günter Heine, “Elaboration of Norms and Protection of the Environment”, Duke-Environmental Law Policy Forum, Volume II, North Carolina, 1992 Harwood, Stephenson. “Comparative Analysis of Administrative & Civil Sanctions in other Jurisdictions”, September 2007
  • Ian Ayres; John Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992
  • İbrahim Kaboğlu, “Dayanışma Haklarının Hukuksal Değeri (Soyut Talepler mi? İnsan Hakları mı?)”, İnsan hakları Yıllığı, Cilt 13, Ankara, 1991
  • Jennifer Norberry, “Australian Pollution Laws: Offences, Penalties and Regulatory Agencies”, in Australian Institute of Criminology Conference Proceedings, No: 26, Environmental Crime: Proceedings of a Conference held 1-3 September 1993
  • Per Hunt CJ in EPA & n (1992) 26 NSWLR 352. Cited in G. Bates, Environmental Law in Australia, 5th Edition, Butterworths LexisNexis, Australia, 2002
  • Peter Grabosky, John Braithwaite, Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies, Oxford University Pres, Oxford, 1986
  • Principled Regulation: Federal Civil and Administrative Penalties in Australia (ALRC Report 95), published by Australian Law Reform Commission Richard Fox, “Criminal Sanctions at the Other End”, paper presented at 3rd National Outlook Symposium on Crime In Australia: Mapping the Boundaries of Australia’s Criminal Justice System, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 1999
  • Richard Fox, “Infringement Notices: Time for Reform”, Australian Institute of Criminology Trends&Issues, No:50, November 1995
  • Richard Johnstone-Christine Parker, “Enforceable Undertakings in Action: Report of a Roundtable Discussion with Australian Regulators”, Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 464, 2010
  • Samantha Bricknell, Environmental Crime in Australia, AIC Reports Research and Public Policy Series 109, Published by Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 2010
  • Steven Shavel, “The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 36 No. 1 Part 2, 1993
  • Taytak Mustafa ve Meçik Oytun, “Küresel Çevre Sorunlarına Karşı Uluslararası Yeşil Diyalog”, Uluslararası Davraz Kongresi, 24-27 Eylül 2009, ss. 251-264
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA35EV78HE
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mehmet Hatipoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 13 Temmuz 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Temmuz 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Hatipoğlu, M. (2016). Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(4), 835-876. https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.239928
AMA Hatipoğlu M. Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri. İnÜHFD. Temmuz 2016;6(4):835-876. doi:10.21492/inuhfd.239928
Chicago Hatipoğlu, Mehmet. “Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri”. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6, sy. 4 (Temmuz 2016): 835-76. https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.239928.
EndNote Hatipoğlu M (01 Temmuz 2016) Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6 4 835–876.
IEEE M. Hatipoğlu, “Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri”, İnÜHFD, c. 6, sy. 4, ss. 835–876, 2016, doi: 10.21492/inuhfd.239928.
ISNAD Hatipoğlu, Mehmet. “Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri”. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6/4 (Temmuz 2016), 835-876. https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.239928.
JAMA Hatipoğlu M. Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri. İnÜHFD. 2016;6:835–876.
MLA Hatipoğlu, Mehmet. “Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri”. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 6, sy. 4, 2016, ss. 835-76, doi:10.21492/inuhfd.239928.
Vancouver Hatipoğlu M. Çevre Korunmasında Avustralya’da Uygulanan İdari Yaptırım Türleri. İnÜHFD. 2016;6(4):835-76.