The object of this paper is a court order on motion to
dismiss indictment in the Republic of Kosova.
This order is a non-meritorious decision, by which the court dismisses
the indictment because it lacks jurisdiction on procedural grounds. The order
on the defendant’s motion constitutes a relatively common type of judgment
rendered in criminal proceedings in Kosovo. This article will address such
orders in several respects including the meaning of the order, its
characteristics, grounds for dismissal and the authority to render it, as well
as the procedure for and effects of reaching this type of verdict. To that
effect, cases before the Basic Courts of Kosovo in which the defendant’s motion
filed with the court asking the judge to throw out certain criminal charges
during the proceedings in a period between 2015 and 2017 will be studied. The
paper aims to foster the expectations that concrete actions should be taken to
advance the performance of judges and prosecutors, highlighting the need to
undertake a more effective vetting of public prosecutors and judges in the
country. For this, there is an increasing support in local and international
public opinion where the belief that Kosovo has already achieved a successful
criminal justice system prevails. A legal, comparative, analytical and
statistical methodology is used for the preparations of the present work.
court prosecutor Order motion to dismiss jurisdiction the defendant prosecutor
The object of this paper is a court order on motion to
dismiss indictment in the Republic of Kosova.
This order is a non-meritorious decision, by which the court dismisses
the indictment because it lacks jurisdiction on procedural grounds. The order
on the defendant’s motion constitutes a relatively common type of judgment
rendered in criminal proceedings in Kosovo. This article will address such
orders in several respects including the meaning of the order, its
characteristics, grounds for dismissal and the authority to render it, as well
as the procedure for and effects of reaching this type of verdict. To that
effect, cases before the Basic Courts of Kosovo in which the defendant’s motion
filed with the court asking the judge to throw out certain criminal charges
during the proceedings in a period between 2015 and 2017 will be studied. The
paper aims to foster the expectations that concrete actions should be taken to
advance the performance of judges and prosecutors, highlighting the need to
undertake a more effective vetting of public prosecutors and judges in the
country. For this, there is an increasing support in local and international
public opinion where the belief that Kosovo has already achieved a successful
criminal justice system prevails. A legal, comparative, analytical and
statistical methodology is used for the preparations of the present work.
court prosecutor Order motion to dismiss jurisdiction the defendant prosecutor
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Hukuk |
Bölüm | Makaleler |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Haziran 2019 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 13 Kasım 2018 |
Kabul Tarihi | 30 Haziran 2019 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 |
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.