SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS' VIEWS ON TWICE EXCEPTIONAL PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

Year 2026, Volume: 15 Issue: 1 , 19 - 34 , 31.03.2026

Fatma Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1653698

https://izlik.org/JA28ZT63BA

Abstract

Twice-exceptional students (2E) exhibit a combination of two distinct conditions. Consequently, 2E students face a dual disadvantage compared to their peers. Throughout primary school, classroom teachers and special education teachers are responsible for supporting 2E students. The opinions of special education teachers regarding the problems and solutions faced by 2E students are particularly valuable. Therefore, the current study aims to reveal the views of special education teachers on the issues of twice-exceptional students, including their challenges and proposed solutions. Regarding the research method, qualitative research and content analysis were used. A total of 71 special education teachers participated in the study. As a result of the research, the special education teachers defined twice-exceptional students in 6 different forms. They generated 20 themes and 360 codes related to the problems and solutions for twice-exceptional students. The problem themes with the highest number of codes were identification problems, lack of teacher training, and lack of education programs. The solution themes are early and detailed identification, psychological and behavioral support, and individualized mixed programs. Based on the research findings, the necessity of early identification, teacher education, and an educational and psychological-behavioral program has emerged. Research findings are discussed within the framework of the relevant literature.

Keywords

Twice-exceptional , special education , student , teacher.

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was given for the research by the Atatürk University Educational Sciences Unit Ethics Board with (the meeting number: 12/29, and decision number: E-56785782-050.02.04-2400002251) approved this study dated 28.12.2023. The research was conducted in strict adherence to the principles of voluntary participation, participant confidentiality, and informed consent, and data were used exclusively for scientific purposes. The author declares that they acted in accordance with ethical rules in all processes of the research. The author declares that there is no potential conflict of interest in the work.

References

• Alabdallat, B., Alkhamra, H., & Alkhamra, R. (2021). Special education and general education teacher perceptions of collaborative teaching responsibilities and attitudes towards an inclusive environment in Jordan. Frontiers in Education, 6(1),1-11, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.739384
• Alameddine, M. M. (2025). What can educators do to accommodate twice-exceptional learners in Lebanon: a case study. South Florida Journal of Development, 6(1), e4899. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv6n1-009
• Assouline, S. G., & Foley-Nicpon, M. (2007). Twice-exceptional learners: Implications for the classroom. NAGC Communiqué Teaching for High Potential, Spring, 9–13.
• Assouline, S. G., Foley Nicpon, M., & Whiteman, C. (2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with written language disability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355974
• Assouline, S., & Whiteman, C. (2011). Twice-exceptionality: Implications for school psychologists in the post-IDEA 2004 area. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(4), 380-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2011.616576
• Austermann, Q., Reis, S. M., & Delgado, J. (2024). Evidence-based ınstructional practices for twice-exceptional students with autism. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862241285151
• Baum, S. M., & Schader, R. M. (2021). Twice-exceptionality: a field whose time has come in Understanding twice exceptional learners, London: Routledge, 7–31.
• Baum, S. M., Schader, R. M., & Hébert, T. P. (2014). Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent focused approach for twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214547632
• Baykoç, N. (2017). Children with special needs and special education. Ankara: Eğiten Kitap Publishing.
• Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2015). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (Translator, Aydın H.). Konya: Educational Publishing House.
• Beumann, S., Weber, D., & Benölken, R. (2025). Identifying and fostering giftedness in students with disabilities – potential barriers in ıdentification and support from a mathematics educational perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10587-2
• Bianco, M. (2005). The effects of disability labels on special education and general education teachers’ referrals for gifted programs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(4), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126967
• Bianco, M., & Leech, N. L. (2010). Twice-exceptional learners: Effects of teacher preparation and disability labels on gifted referrals. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409356392
• Bonti, E., & Sofologi, M. (2022). Rethinking inclusion of gifted and twice-exceptional 2E students. In M. Efstratopoulou (Ed.), Rethinking Inclusion and Transformation in Special Education. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4680-5.ch002
• Buic•-Belciu, C., & Popovici, D. V. (2014). Being twice exceptional: Gifted students with learning disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 519-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.302
• Cansız, M., & Bayar, A. (2024). Problems and solutions faced by teachers with inclusive students in their classrooms. Eurasian Journal of Social and Economic Research (EJSER), 11(3), 88-106. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/asead/issue/86477/1485833#article_cite
• Dare, L., & Nowicki, E. A. (2015). Twice-exceptionality: Parents’ perspectives on 2E identification. Roeper Review, 37(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1077911
• Erdimez, Ö. (2023). Pre-service special education teachers' perceptions of giftedness. ATLAS Journal International Refereed Journal on Social Sciences, 9(52), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10298234
• Firat, T., & Bildiren, A. (2022). The characteristics of gifted 2E students with learning disabilities according to preschool teachers. Early Years, 43(4–5), 921–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2022.2034755
• Flowers, C., Test, D. W., Povenmire-Kirk, T. C., Diegelmann, K. M., Bunch-Crump, K. R., Kemp-Inman, A., & Goodnight, C. I. (2018). A demonstration model of ınteragency collaboration for students with disabilities: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917720764
• Foley-Nicpon, M., & Teriba, A. (2022). Policy considerations for twice-exceptional students. Gifted Child Today, 45(4), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221110943
• Foley-Nicpon, M., Assouline, S. G., & Colangelo, N. (2013). Twice-exceptional learners: Who needs to know what? Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490021
• Gallagher, J. (2006). The twice-exceptional dilemma. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
• Gierczyk, M., & Hornby, G. (2021). Twice-exceptional students: Review of implications for special and inclusive education. Educ. Sci., 11(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020085
• Gilman, B. J., Lovecky, D. V., Kearney, K., Peters, D. B., Wasserman, J. D., Silverman, L. K., Postma, M. G., Robinson, N. M., Amend, E. R., Ryder-Schoeck, M., Curry, P. H., Lyon, S. K., Rogers, K. B., Collins, L. E., Charlebois, G. M., Harsin, C. M., & Rimm, S. B. (2013). Critical issues in the identification of gifted students with co-existing disabilities: The twice-exceptional. Sage Open, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013505855
• Gómez-Arízaga, M. P., & Conejeros-Solar, M. L. (2021). Gifted and twice-exceptional 2e students in the South of the World: Chilean students’ experiences within regular classrooms. In: Smith, S.R. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_8
• Gürsel, O. (2013). Students with special educational needs and special education (Ed. H. İbrahim Diken). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Hawes, J. M. (2004). Teaching is not telling: The case method as a form of interactive learning. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 5(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.63963/001c.150425
• Hernandez, D. A., Hueck, S., & Charley, C. (2016). General education and special education teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 11(3), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.318
• Heward, W. L. (2006). Exceptional 2E students: An introduction to special education. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Hughes, C. E. (2019). Targeted professional learning for twice-exceptional students: A double target. In A. M. Novak & C. L. Weber (Eds.), Best practices in professional learning and teacher preparation: Special topics for gifted professional development. Prufrock Press Inc.
• Jolly, J. L., & Barnard-Brak, L. (2024). Special education status and underidentification of twice-exceptional students: insights from ECLS-K data. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101048
• Josephson, J., Wolfgang, C., & Mehrenberg, R. (2018). Strategies for supporting students who are twice-exceptional. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1073
• Kaufman, S. B. (2018). Twice exceptional: Supporting and educating bright and creative students with learning difficulties. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Kaya, F. (2015). Teachers’ conceptions of giftedness and special needs of gifted students. Education and Science, 40(177), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.2885
• King, S. (2022). The education context for twice-exceptional students: An overview of issues in special and gifted education. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 193, 107659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107659
• Klingner, R. (2022). Twice-exceptional 2E students and their challenges in dealing with normality. Education Science, 12, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040268
• LeBeau, B., Schabilion, K., Assouline, S.G., Nicpon, M. F., Doobay, A. F., & Mahatmya, D. (2022). Developmental milestones as early indicators of twice-exceptionality. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 194, 107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107671
• Maddocks, D. L. S. (2018). The identification of students who are gifted and have a learning disability: A comparison of different diagnostic criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752096
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. New York: Sage. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Mayes, R. D., & Moore, J. L. (2016). The intersection of race, disability, and giftedness: Understanding the education needs of twice-exceptional, African American students. Gifted Child Today, 39(2), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516628570
• MacNeil, K. A., Butler, D. L., & Schnellert, L. M. (2023). From accountability to shared responsibility: A case study of a multi-layered educational change initiative. Journal Educational Change, 24(1), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09440-4
• MNE (Türkiye Ministry of National Education), (2012). Regulation on special education services. The Official Newspaper, No. 28360, Ankara.
• Morrison, W. F., & Rizza, M. G. (2007). Creating a toolkit for identifying twice-exceptional students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-513
• Neihart, M. (2008). Identifying and providing services to twice exceptional children. Pfeiffer, S. I. (Ed.). Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychological theory, research and best practices, 115-137. New York: Springer.
• Pamungkas, B., Wahab, R., Suwarjo, S., & Susen, A. (2023). School and family collaboration on twice-exceptional academic program services. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(12), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.17
• Patton, M. Q. (1990b). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd Ed.). London: Sage Publications.
• Randall, C. (2021). The underrepresentation of twice-exceptional students in gifted programs. Piedmont College.
• Rapp, A. C., & Corral-Granados, A. (2024). Understanding inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725
• Reis S., Baum S., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, S. J. (2025). Research-based strength-based teaching and support strategies for twice-exceptional high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060834
• Renzulli, S. J., & Gelbar, N. (2019). Leadership roles for school counselors in identifying and supporting twice-exceptional (2E) students. Professional School Counseling, 23(1), 1–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27136496
• Speirs Neumeister, K. L. (2024). Maximizing the potential of twice-exceptional learners: Creating a framework of stakeholder supports. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231193699
• Şentürk, Ş., Kefeli, İ., & İlhan Emecan, B. (2022). Policy recommendation for twice exceptional (2E) students in Turkey. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 41(2), 677-696. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.1202248
• MFSS-Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Services, (2021). Disability and aging statistics bulletin https://www.aile.gov.tr/media/74722/eyhgm_istatistik_bulteni_mart_2021.pdf [Access Date: 20.01.2025]
• Tortop, H. S., & Agaoglu, O. (2022). Special education teacher’ selection, education and appointment policy: Türkiye case. Journal for the Child Development, Exceptionality and Education, 3(2), 95-102.
• Tortop, H. S., & Ilgaz, G. (2023). Developing of in-service training program for teacher working with gifted learning disabled students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 11(3), 263-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1329220
• Townend, G., & Brown, R. (2016). Exploring a sociocultural approach to understanding academic self-concept in twice-exceptional students. Int. J. Educ. Res. 80, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.006
• Unda, L. A., Gong, Z., Benati, K., & Loh, C. M. (2023). Role expectations and shared accountability: A framework for school governance. Financial Accountability & Management, 39, 790-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12322
• Villanueva, A. S. A., & Huber, T. (2019). The issues in identifying twice exceptional students: a review of the literature. International Journal of Development Research, 9(9), 30101-30112.
• Wang, W. C., & Neihart, M. (2015). How do supports from parents, teachers, and peers influence academic achievement of twice-exceptional students. Gifted Child Today, 38, 148-159.
• Weber, D., Beumann, S., & Benölken, R. (2023). Teachers’ view of twice-exceptional students– outline of the challenges in recognizing mathematical giftedness and supporting needs of hearing impairment. Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13), Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics; Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest, July, Budapest, Hungary. https://hal.science/hal-04407409/document (Access Date: 09/02/2025).
• Will, M. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52(5), 411 415. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605200502
• Wilson, A. (2015). A guide to phenomenological research. Nursing Standard, 29(34), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.34.38.e8821
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Zigmond, N. P., Kloo, A., & Rock, M. L. (2024). Necessary differences between general and special education. In J. M. Kauffman, D. P. Hallahan, & P. C. Pullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education. Routledge.