THE EFFECT OF JIGSAW II TECHNIQUE ON MATHEMATIC ATTITUDES AND CONSTRUCTIVE LEARNING

Year 2021, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 344 - 360, 31.12.2021

Yasemin Derıngol Ayşe Nihan Zengın , Sibel Ozturk

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine the effects of mathematics activities prepared by using Jigsaw II technique on fourth grade students. A mixed design was used, consisting of a combination of pre-test post-test without control group a Quasi experimental design and qualitative data. The research’s study group consisted of 21 fourth-grade students. The researchers created math activities for the Jigsaw II technique which were used throughout the process. The “Mathematics Attitude Scale” and “Constructivist Learning Environment Scale” were used as pre-test and post-test data collection. In addition, at the end of the application, students’ opinions on the application were recorded. The Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was used in the analysis of the data, and content analysis was used to analyze the student views on the application, as well as direct quotations from the students’ statements. The analysis concluded that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test average scores of the research group’s mathematics attitude and constructivist learning environment situations of the in favor of the post-test. At the end of the process, most of the students expressed positive opinions about these activities. This technique is recommended to use more frequently in classrooms because it improves students’ attitudes towards mathematics lesson and constructivist learning.

Keywords

Jigsaw II technique, mathematics, mathematics attitude, constructivist learning environment.

References

• Adams, F. H. (2013). Using Jigsaw technique as an effective way of promoting cooperation learning among primary six pupils in Fijai. International Journal of Education and Practice, 1(6), 64-74.
• Akar, F. (2006). Buluş yoluyla öğrenmenin ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik dersinde öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisi [The effectiveness of the discovery learning strategy on the mathematics achievement at the second step elementary education], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
• Akar, S. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin işbirlikli öğrenme modeli hakkında bilgilendirilmesi, bu modelin sınıfta uygulamaları ve elde edilen sonuçların değerlendirilmesi: Kars il örneği [Informing science and technology teachers about the cooperative learning model, applying this model in the classroom and evaluating the results obtained: Kars sample], (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
• Akay, C. (2005). Ortaöğretim İngilizce dersinde okuma ve yazma becerilerinin kazandırılmasında oluşturmacılık (constructivism) temelli sosyal etkileşim modelinin öğrenciler üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi [Examining the effects of the social interaction model, which is based on constructivism, on the students in acquiring writing and reading skils in English], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
• Akbuğa, S. (2009). İlköğretim 4.sınıf matematik dersinde işbirlikli öğrenme ilkelerine göre yapılandırılmış grup etkinliklerinin öğrenci erişilerine ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of group activities structured according to cooperative learning principles on students' level at the beginnig and at the end and attitudes in 4th grade mathematics lesson in primary school], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
• Altun, S. & Büyükduman, İ. (2007). A case study on student and teacher views on constructivist instructional design practice. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 7(1), 30-39.
• Andersen, T. (2009). Using cooperative learning in a sixth grade math classroom (Action Research Projects). Lincoln: Universty of Nebraska.
• Aronson, E., Stephen, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
• Atasoy, Ş., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2006). Evaluation of the application process of worksheets developed in accordance with the constructivist learning theory. Journal of National Education, 35(170), 157-175.
• Atasoy, B., Genç, E., Kadayıfçı, H., & Akkuġ, H. (2007). The effect of cooperatıve learning to grade 7 students’understanding of physical and chemical changes topic. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 32, 12-21.
• Avcı, S., & Fer, S. (2004). The effects of Jigsaw II technique in a cooperative learning environment on students: A case study at Kartal vocational training center. Education and Science, 29(134), 61-74.
• Ayaz, M., & Şekerci, H. (2016). The effect of constructivist learning approach to attitudes of the students towards lessons: A meta-analysis study. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 47, 46-63.
• Aykaç, N. (2005). Active Learning methods in learning and teaching process. Ankara: Naturel Publishing.
• Baki, A. (2014). Mathematics education from theory to practice. Ankara: Letter Education Publishing.
• Baki, A. (2018). Knowledge of teaching math. Ankara: Pegem A Academy Publishing.
• Bal, A. P., & Doğanay, A. (2009). Views of primary school fifth grade students to the constructivist learning environment in mathematics lesson. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 18(2), 156-171.
• Barbato, R. (2000). Policy implications of cooperative learning on the achievement and attitudes of secondary school mathematics students, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fordham University, New York.
• Baş, G. (2012). Students’views on the constructivist learning environment in elementary schools: A qualitative inquiry. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 42(2), 64-86.
• Baykul, Y. (1990). Changes in attitudes towards mathematics and science lessons from the fifth grade of primary school to high school and equivalent schools, and some factors that are related to success in student selection examination. Ankara: ÖSYM Publications.
• Bayrak, F., & Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2018). Examining 4th grade elementary students’ mathematical beliefs and their views about constructivist learning environments. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(3), 100-114. Doi: 10.19126/suje.422315
• Bosfield, G. F. (2004). A comparison of traditional mathematical learning and cooperative mathematical learning. Counseling: Faculty of California State University Dominguez Hills.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Experimental patterns: Pretest-posttest control group pattern and data analysis. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
• Carlan, V. G., Rubin, R., & Morgan, B. M. (2004). Cooperative learning, mathematical problem solving, and latinos. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the american educational research association, San Diego, CA.
• Çalık, A. V. (2017). The effectiveness of jigsaw tecnique of cooperative learning on the subject of quadrangels in 7th grade, (Unpublished Master Thesis). Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey.
• Cumhur, F. (2017). The using and evaluation of the learning together technique in the teaching mathematics. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 5, 285-295.
• Decorte, E. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning (Mathematics) from instruction. International Association for Applied Psychology, 53(2), 279-310.
• Dellalbaşı, O., & Soylu, Y. (2012). The effect of jıgsaw and group research techniques on the academic success of 8th grade students in mathematics courses. International Journal of Social Science, 5(7), 229-245.
• Demirel, Ö. (2011). Teaching principles and methods: The art of teaching. Pegem Academy, Ankara.
• Doymuş, K. (2007). Effects of a cooperative learning strategy on teaching and learning phases of matter and one-component phase diagrams. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(11), 1857-1860.
• Dyson, B. 2002. The implementation of cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 69-85.
• Efe, M. (2011). İşbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin, öğrenci takımları başarı bölümleri ve küme destekli bireyselleştirme tekniklerinin ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik dersi ?istatistik ve olasılık? ünitesindeki başarılarına, tutumlarına ve motivasyonlarına etkisi, (Unpublished Master Thesis). Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.
• Eren, E. (2004). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi (8th edition). İstanbul: Beta Publishing.
• Gelici, Ö., & Bilgin, İ. (2012). The effects of cooperative learning techniques on the students’ achievement in algebra learning, their attitudes, and on their critical thinking skills. Journal of Abant İzzet Baysal Faculty of Education, 12, 2, 9-32.
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 17.0 update, Boston: Pearson.
• Genç, M., & Şahin, F. (2015). The effects of cooperative learning on attitude and achievement. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 375-396.
• Glassman, P. (1988). A study of cooperative learning in mathematics, writing and reading as implemented in third, fourth and fifth grade classes: A focus upon achievement, attitudes and self-esteem for males, females, blacks, hispanics and anglos. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED294926.pdf
• Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw. A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325-332.
• Holliday, D. C. (2002, Mart 26). Jigsaw IV: Using student/teacher concerns to improve Jigsaw III. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED465687.pdf
• Ifamuyiwa, S. A., & Akinsola, M. K. (2008). Improving senior secondary school students’ attitude towards mathematics through self and cooperative- instructional strategies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(5), 569-585.
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Scott, L. (1978). The effects of cooperative and ındividualized ınstruction on student attitudes and achievement. The Journal of Social Psychology, 104(2), 207-216. doi:10.1080/00224545.1978.9924062
• Kaba, Y., Özdişçi, S., & Soylu, Ş. (2017). The effect of Jigsaw-I technique on 7th grade middle school students’attitude and self effıcacy toward geometry. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12, 28, 473-488. DOI: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.12088
• Karalı, Y. (2017). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme yönteminin Matematik dersinde öğrencilerin akademik başarısına ve tutumuna etkisi [Impact of cooperative learning method on students’ academic achievement and attitude on mathematics], (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
• Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method (14th edition). Ankara: Nobel Publication Distribution.
• Keskin, G., & Yıldırım, G. Ö. (2008). The evaluation of university students in terms of problem solving autonomy multiple ıntelligences based on constructive approach norms. Journal of Inonu University Education Faculty, 9(16), 67-88.
• Koç, B. (2015). İşbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin matematik dersindeki erişiye, kalıclığa ve sosyal beceriye etkisi. [The effects of cooperative learning on academic achievement, retention and social skills], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
• Kol, S. (2019). Türkiye ve Azerbaycan’daki eğitim sistemlerinin incelenmesi. Azərbaycan və Türkiyə universitetlərinin əməkdaşliq istiqamətləri: mövcud vəziyyət və perspektivlər. 124-181. Baku: UNEC. Liang, L. L. (1997). Resistance to the implementation of a new constructivist science curriculum for prospective elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
• Mathematics Education Program (2018). Primary and secondary school grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. MEB: Ankara.
• Mattingly R. M., & VanSickle R. L, (1991), Cooperative Learning and Achievement in Social Studies: Jigsaw II, ERIC Number: ED348267 (https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED348267)
• McManus, S. M., & Gettinger, M. (1996). Teacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviors. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 13-22.
• MEB (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı) (2019). Türk eğitim sistemi, http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/eurydice/kitaplar/Turk_Egitim_Sistemi_2 017/TES_2017.pdf
• Moore, N. M. (2005). Constructivism using group work and the impact on self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and group work skills on middle-school mathematics students, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). UMİ: AAT 3164690
• Moskowitz, J. M., Malvin, J. H., Schaeffer, G. A., & Schaps, E. (1985). Evaluation of jigsaw, a cooperative learning technique. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10(2), 104-112.
• Mulryan, C. M. (1994). Perceptions of intermediate students’ cooperative small-group work in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(5), 280-291.
• Özdoğan, E. (2008). İşbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin ilköğretim 4. sınıf matematik öğretiminde öğrenci tutum ve başarısına etkisi: Bilgisayar destekli işbirlikli öğrenme ve küme destekli bireyselleştirme tekniği [The effect of cooperative learning method to the fourth grade students’ attitude and achievement on mathematic learning: the computer supported collobarotive learning (CSCL) and team assisted individualization method (TAİ)], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
• Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2012). An analysis of student views on activities developed according to learning styles within a constructivist learning environment. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 18, 239-258.
• Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2014). The effects of learning activities corresponding with students’ learning styles on academic success and attitude within the scope of constructivist learning approach: The case of the concepts of function and derivative. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-38.
• Özkal, K., Tekkaya, C., Çakiroglu, J., & Sungur, S. (2009). A conceptual model of relationships among constructivist learning environment perceptions, epistemological beliefs, and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 71-79.
• Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual. Sidney, Australia: Allen Unwin.
• Panitz, T. (1999). New directions for teaching and learning. The Motivational Benefits of Cooperative Learning, 78, 59-68.
• Pınar, S. (2007). Ölçüler konusunun eğitim teknolojileri ve işbirlikli öğrenme yöntemleriyle öğrenilmesinin öğrencilerin matematik başarılarına etkisi. [Effects of learning ‘measures’ topics on students by education technologies and cooperative learning methods], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Sevim, O. (2015). The effect of topic jigsaw technique on success and problem solving skills of secondary school seventh grade students. Education and Science, 40, 177, 385-400.
• Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning. Professional Library National Education Association, Washington, D C.
• Sharan, S. (1999). Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Praeger Publishers: Westport.
• Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. L. (1979). An extended cooperative learning experience in elemantary school. National Institution of Education, Washington D.C.
• Stahl, R. (1994). Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers. Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
• Sönmez, S. (2005). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme yöntemi, birleştirme tekniği ile bilgisayar okur-yazarlığı öğretiminin akademik başarıya ve kalıcılığa etkisi [The effects of cooperative learning method, Jigsaw technique, in teaching computer literacy on the academic achievement and retention], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
• Şengül, S., & Ekinözü, İ. (2004). The Effect of Animation Method on Students’ Recall Attitude and Perceived Benefits of Mathematics in Mathematics Course. 13. National Educational Sciences Congress, Inönü University, Malatya.
• Tezer, M., & Cumhur, M. (2016). Anthropological theory of didactics and the probability of the constructivist approach being a solution to the common mistakes made in mathematics lessons. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(1-2), 148-156.
• Tsai, C. (1990). Relationship between student sciencetific epistemological beliefs and perception of constructivist learning environment. Educational Recearch, 42(2), 193-205.
• Turgut, S. (2018). The effects of cooperative learning on mathematics attitude in Turkey: A Meta-analytic review. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 38(3), 1233-1254.
• Umay, A. (1996). Mathematics education and measurement. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 12, 145-149.
• Unamba, E. C., & Ugochkwn, N. J. (2015). Effect of learning-together on pupils achievement in primary mathematics. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 6(1), 59-65.
• Van De Walle, J., Karp, K. S, & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2012). Elementary and secondary school mathematics teaching with a developmental approach. (Ed. Soner Durmuş). Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
• Varank, İ., & Kuzucuoğlu, G., (2007). The effect of co-learning technique on students’mathematics achievement and cooperative study skills in cooperative learning. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 323-332.
• Yıldırım-Doğru, E. (2012). The effect of separation technique used in mathematics teaching on students’self-efficacy, anxiety and permanence levels, (Unpublished Master Thesis). Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
• Yılmaz, S. (2004). The effect of cooperative learning method on student achievement according to the traditional learning method in teaching the decimal unit of fractions in the sixth grade of primary education. 13. National Educational Sciences Congress, Inönü University, Malatya.
• Yılmaz, B. (2006). Beşinci sınıf öğretmenlerinin fen ve teknoloji dersinde yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamı düzenleme becerileri [Fifth grade teachers’ organizing constructivist learning environment in science and technology lesson], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Zakaria, E., Solfitri, T., Daud, Y., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2013). Effect of cooperative learning on secondary school students’ mathematics achievement. Creative Education, 4(2), 98-100.