THE EFFECT OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING ON PRE-SERVICE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS' CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AND MISCONCEPTIONS

Year 2021, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 50 - 72, 30.06.2021

Çiğdem Şenyiğit

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the effect of problem-based learning on misconceptions and conceptual understanding regarding simple electric circuits. Participants are 54 pre-service primary school teachers enrolled on the Basic Science in Elementary School course at a state university. The research employs a nonequivalent control group model. The activity sheets containing problem-based scenarios prepared by the researcher were used in the experimental group. In the control group, the lecture-based learning supported by problem solving, question-answer, discussion activities and demonstration experiments was used. Data were gathered by three-tier Simple Electric Circuit Diagnostic Test consisting of 12 questions developed by Peşman (2005). The research revealed that problem-based learning is more effective in improving conceptual understanding and overcoming misconceptions than lecture-based learning.

Keywords

Problem-based learning, conceptual understanding, misconceptions, simple electric circuit, pre-service primary school teachers.

References

• Abraham, M. R. (2005). Inquiry and the learning cycle approach. In N. J. Pienta, M. M. Cooper, & T. J. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemists’ guide to effective teaching (pp. 41–52). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Afra, N. C., Osta, I., & Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students’ alternative conceptions about electricity and effect of inquiry-based teaching strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9106-7
• Ahied, M., & Ekapti, R. F. (2020). Conceptual understanding of pressure concept through problem based learning in junior high school grade 8th. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042120
• Akınoğlu, O., & Tandoğan, R. Ö. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75375
• Altun, S. (2009). Üç aşamalı bir testle fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının basit elektrik devreleri konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının tespiti [Determination of prospective science teachers’ misconceptions of simple electric circuits issue with three-stage test]. Bayburt University Journal of Education Faculty, 4(1), 72-79.
• Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and temperature among physics students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074
• Anggoro, S., Widodo, A., Suhandi, A., & Treagust, D. F. (2019). Using a discrepant event to facilitate preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual change about force and motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105275
• Arı, Ü., Peşman, H., & Baykara, O. (2017). Sorgulamaya dayalı öğretimde rehberlik düzeyinin fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının kavram yanılgılarını iyileştirmedeki etkisinin bilimsel süreç becerileriyle etkileşimi [Interaction of effect upon remediating prospective science teachers’ misconceptions by guidance level in inquiry teaching with science process skills]. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(1), 304-321.
• Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 2(4), 334-339. Retrieved from https://publications.waset.org/15369/pdf
• Aydeniz, M., & Dogan, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of argumentation on pre-service science teachers' conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00170F
• Aykutlu, I., & Şen, A. İ. (2012). Üç aşamalı test, kavram haritası ve analoji kullanılarak lise öğrencilerinin elektrik akımı konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi [Determination of secondary school students’ misconceptions about the electric current using a three tier test, concept maps and analogies]. Education and Science, 37(166), 275-288.
• Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804
• Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (Vol. 1). Broadway New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
• Bayram, A. (2010). Probleme dayalı öğrenme yönteminin ilköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersi “ısı ve sıcaklık” konusunda sahip oldukları kavram yanılgılarını gidermede etkisi [The effect of problem based learning on overcoming 5th grade students’ misconceptions about “heat and temperature”]. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Selçuk University, Konya.
• Bilgin, I., Şenocak, E., & Sözbilir, M. (2009). The effects of problem-based learning instruction on university students’ performance of conceptual and quantitative problems in gas concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75267
• Bostan Sarıoğlan, A., & Abacı, B. (2017). Sorgulamaya dayalı öğretimin “lamba parlaklığı” kavramının ortaokul 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin başarısına etkisi [The effect of inquiry based learning approach about "light bright" concept on 5th grade middle school students]. Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 19(3), 164-171.
• Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1997). Changing problem-based learning. Introduction to the second edition. In D. Boud, & G. Feletti, (Eds.), The challenge of problem based learning (2nd edition) (pp. 1-14). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
• Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do students know what they know and what they don’t know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. A Project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
• Cantürk-Günhan, B. (2006). İlköğretim II. kademede matematik dersinde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin uygulanabilirliği üzerine bir araştırma [An investigation on applicability of problem based learning in the mathematics lesson at the second stage in the elementary education] (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
• Cataloglu, E. (2002). Development and validation of an achievement test in introductory quantum mechanics: The quantum mechanics visualization instrument (QMVI) (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
• Chen, C. H., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2007). The effect of web-based question prompts on scaffolding knowledge integration and ill-structured problem solving. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782487
• Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon and L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2006). Problem‐based learning: Using ill‐structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20097
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th edition). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
• Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51(5), 407-412. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13226
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, Florida: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
• Cronk, B. C. (2020). How to use SPSS: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation (11th edition). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
• Dahlgren, M. A., & Öberg, G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education, 41(3), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004138810465
• Darmofal, D. L., Soderholm, D. H., & Brodeur. D. R. (2002, November). Using concept maps and concept questions to enhance conceptual understanding. 32nd Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 3, pp. T3A-1-T3A-6, 6-9 November 2002, Boston, MA.
• De Grave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science, 24(5), 321-341.
• Demirezen, S., & Yağbasan, R. (2013). 7E modelinin basit elektrik devreleri konusundaki kavram yanılgıları üzerine etkisi [The effect of 7E model on misconceptions about simple electrical circuits]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 132-151.
• Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., Suyanta, Susila, I., & Irwanto (2019). Developing an instrument to detect science misconception of an elementary school teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 201-218.
• diSessa, A. A. (2014). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd edition) (pp. 88–108). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087-1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
• Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2001). Solving problems with group work in problem‐based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Medical Education, 35(9), 884-889.
• Driver, R. (1981). Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810030109
• Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. J. Duch, S. E. Groh, & D. E. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3-11). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
• Dupin, J. J., & Johsua, S. (1987). Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(9), 791-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240903
• Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement (4th edition). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
• Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students' understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813
• Eren, C. D., & Akınoğlu, O. (2012). Fen eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin kavram öğrenmeye etkisi [The effect of problem based learning on concept learning in science education]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(3), 19-32.
• Erickson, D. K. (1999). A problem-based approach to mathematics instruction. The Mathematics Teacher, 92(6), 516-521.
• Fadaei, S. S., & Mora, C. (2015). An investigation about misconceptions in force and motion in high school. US-China Education Review A, 5(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.01.004
• Fadillah, A., & Salirawati, D. (2018). Analysis of misconceptions of chemical bonding among tenth grade senior high school students using a two-tier test. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, 080002-1-080002-7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062821
• Fahmi, F., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). The misconceptions of senior high school students in Banjarmasin on chemical bonding. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(17), 32-39.
• Farrokhnia, M. R., & Esmailpour, A. (2010). A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students’ conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity laboratory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5474-5482.
• Fisher, K. M. (1985). A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220105
• Fredette, N., & Lochhead, J. (1980). Student conceptions of simple circuits. Physics Teacher, 18(3), 194-198. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2340470
• Gavalcante, P. S., Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (1997). The effect of various kinds of lesson on conceptual understanding in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150205
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th edition). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
• Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
• Gooding, J., & Metz, B. (2011). From misconceptions to conceptual change: Tips for identifying and overcoming students' misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 34-37.
• Goodman, R. J. B. (2010). Problem-based learning: Merging of economics and mathematics. Journal of Economics and Finance, 34(4), 477-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-010-9154-7
• Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (6th edition). Boston: Cangage Learning.
• Günter, T., Akkuzu, N., & Alpat, Ş. (2017). Understanding ‘green chemistry’ and ‘sustainability’: An example of problem-based learning (PBL). Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(4), 500-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1353964
• Hadjiachilleos, S., Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2013). The impact of cognitive and affective aspects of cognitive conflict on learners’ conceptual change about floating and sinking. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 133 152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.811074
• Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056 1065. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14031
• Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1987.9654897
• Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education, 15(2), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/15/2/308
• Hendry, G. D., Frommer, M., & Walker, R. A. (1999). Constructivism and problem‐based learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(3), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877990230306
• Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502-506. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344278
• Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200804
• Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. B. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051837
• Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110506
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
• Iglesias, J. L. (2002). Problem-based learning in initial teacher education. Prospects, 32(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022133529435
• Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation‐laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71-93.
• Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
• Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504505
• Kalaya, T., Nopparatjamjomras, S., Chitaree, R., & Nopparatjamjomras, T. R. (2019). Worksheet analysis for revealing students’ understanding of simple DC circuits. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1380. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012164
• Kırılmazkaya, G., & Kırbağ Zengin, F. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının fotosentez konusu hakkında kavram yanılgılarının vee diyagramı aracılığıyla belirlenmesi ve bu araca yönelik görüşlerinin tespiti [Determination of photosynthesis misconceptions’ through vee diyagrams and preservice teachers’ views towards these tools]. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 18(2), 1537-1563.
• Klammer, J. (1998). An overview of techniques for identifying, acknowledging and overcoming alternate conceptions in physics education. Klingenstein Project Paper, Teachers College, Columbia University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423121).
• Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2007). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 101-115.
• Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S. S., Kim, J. W., Kwon, H. G., & Park, H. K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary‐level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
• Lohman, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. (2000). Designing groups in problem-based learning to promote problem-solving skill and self-directedness. Instructional Science, 28(4), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003927228005
• Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). Students' conceptions of constructivist learning: A comparison between a traditional and a problem-based learning curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(4), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9015-5
• Manunure, K., Delserieys, A., & Castéra, J. (2019). The effects of combining simulations and laboratory experiments on Zimbabwean students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(3), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1629407
• Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why problem-based learning works: Theoretical foundations. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 221-238.
• Millar, R., & King, T. (1993). Students’ understanding of voltage in simple series electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150310
• Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2011). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
• Mubarokah, F. D., Mulyani, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Identifying students’ misconceptions of acid-base concepts using a three-tier diagnostic test: A case of Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special), 51 58. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10256a
• Musal, B., Akalın, E., Kılıç, O., Esen, A, & Alıcı, E. (2002). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi probleme dayalı öğretim programı, süreçleri ve eğitim yönlendiricilerinin rolü [PBL program, process and the roles of tutors in Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine]. The World of Medical Education, 9(9), 39-49.
• Nangku, M. S., & Rohaeti, E. (2019). The effect of problem-based learning model toward students’ conceptual understanding and verbal communication skills in reaction rate learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012037
• Narjaikaew, P. (2013). Alternative conceptions of primary school teachers of science about force and motion. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.503
• Nie, Y., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J. C., Liu, Q., Han, J., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2019). Teaching towards knowledge integration in learning force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2271-2295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1672905
• Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A step-by-step guide to SPSS for sport and exercise studies. London: Routledge.
• Peşman, H. (2005). Development of a three-tier to assess ninth grade students' misconceptions about simple electric circuits (Unpublished Master Thesis). Orta Doğu Teknik University, Ankara.
• Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002
• Picciarelli, V., Di Gennaro, M., Stella, R., & Conte, E. (1991). A study of university students' understanding of simple electric circuits part 1: Current in d.c. circuits. European Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799108939503
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
• Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., Aminah, N. S., & Affandy, H. (2019). Problem-based learning with argumentation skills to improve students’ concept understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012065
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
• Reynolds, J. M., & Hancock, D. R. (2010). Problem‐based learning in a higher education environmental biotechnology course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703291003718919
• Roh, K. H. (2003). Problem-based learning in mathematics. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education, Columbus, OH. EDO-SE-03-07. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482725).
• Rohmah, F., Pramono, S. E., & Yusuf, A. (2020). Problem based learning assisted by mobile learning to improve conceptual understanding of primary school students. Educational Management, 9(1), 51-58.
• Roth, K. J. (1990). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science. In B. F. Jones, & L. Idol, (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 139- 175). Broadway Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Sahin, M. (2010). Effects of problem-based learning on university students’ epistemological beliefs about physics and physics learning and conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9198-7
• Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
• Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
• Schmidt, H. G., De Volder, M. L., De Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 610- 619.
• Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self‐efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199809)82:5<553::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-8
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31-56). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Setyani, N. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Handhika, J. (2017). Students conception and perception of simple electrical circuit. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012051
• Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1994). The nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits. Science Education, 78(5), 489-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780505
• Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics Education, 23(2), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/23/2/004
• Smith, E. L., Blakeslee, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300202
• Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649
• Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25-28.
• Suciatmoko, P. M., Suparmi, A., & Sukarmin, S. (2018). An analysis of students’ conceptual understanding: How do students understand some electricity concepts?. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014(1), 20154-1-20154-6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054558
• Suliyanah, Putri, H. N. P. A., & Rohmawati, L. (2018). Identification student’s misconception of heat and temperature using three-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012035
• Suryadi, A., Kusairi, S., & Husna, D. A. (2020). Comparative study of secondary school students' and pre-service teachers' misconception about simple electric circuit. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 16(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i2.21909
• Şen, Ş., & Yılmaz, A. (2017). The development of a three-tier chemical bonding concept test. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 110-126.
• Şenyiğit, Ç. (2020). Sorgulama temelli öğrenmenin sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve kavramsal anlamalarına etkisi [The effect of inquiry-based learning on elementary school teacher candidates' scientific process skills and conceptual understanding] (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th edition). NY: Pearson.
• Tahir, F. M., Nasri, N. M., & Halim, L. (2020). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain-animation (poe-a) strategy to overcome students’ misconceptions about electric circuits concepts. Learning Science and Mathematics Journal, 15, 1-15.
• Tarhan, L., & Acar, B. (2007). Problem‐based learning in an eleventh grade chemistry class: ‘Factors affecting cell potential’. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 351-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701535299
• Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K–16 education (2nd edition). Alexandria, Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
• Türkoğuz, S., & Cin, M. (2013). Argümantasyona dayalı kavram karikatürü etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin kavramsal anlama düzeylerine etkisi [Effects of argumentation based concept cartoon activities on students' conceptual understanding levels]. Dokuz Eylül University the Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 35, 155-173.
• Uden, L., & Beaumont, C. (2006). Technology and problem-based learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
• Ula, W. R. R., Supardi, K. I., & Sulhadi, S. (2018). The implementation of problem based learning with mind mapping to improve the student’s understanding of concept. Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPE.V7I2.23089
• Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358
• Villarino, G. N. B. (2018). Students’ alternative conceptions and patterns of understanding on electric circuits. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(4), 49-70.
• Wardani, S., Nurhayati, S., & Hardiyanti, P. C. (2017). The effectiveness of problem based learning model to improve conceptual understanding and intrapersonal skill. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(5), 1576-1580.
• West, S. G., Biesanz, J. C., & Pitts, S. C. (2000). Casual inference and generalization in field settings: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edition) (pp. 40-84). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2017). Undergraduate students’ misconception on acid-base and argentometric titrations: A challenge to implement multiple representation learning model with cognitive dissonance strategy. International Journal of Education (IJE), 9(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v9i2.5464
• Widodo, W., Rosdiana, L., Fauziah, A. M., & Suryanti (2018). Revealing student’s multiple-misconception on electric circuits. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012088
• Wild, T. A., Hilson, M. P., & Hobson, S. M. (2013). The conceptual understanding of sound by students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1310700204
• Wood, D. F. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine-Problem based learning. BMJ, 328-330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
• Zacharia, Z. C., & de Jong, T. (2014). The effects on students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits of introducing virtual manipulatives within a physical manipulatives-oriented curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 32(2), 101-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.887083
• Zahro, R., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The effect of web-assisted problem based learning model on physics conceptual understanding of 10th grade students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012058
• Zhiqing, Z. (2015). Assimilation, accommodation, and equilibration: A schema-based perspective on translation as process and as product. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 11(1-2), 84-89.