A BLOOM’S TAXONOMY-BASED ANALAYSIS OF 9th and 10th GRADES ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEXTBOOKS’ FINAL EXAMINATIONS AND REVISION QUESTIONS

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 197 - 211, 31.12.2020

Areen Mohammad Bayaydah Ahmad Issa Altweıssı

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and analyze the patterns of final exam questions prepared by English teachers for the 9th and 10th grades and to analyze all the revision questions presented in the English language textbooks in Jordan, based on Bloom's taxonomy to determine the nature and types of these questions. The sample of the study consisted of (63) English language teachers (31 male and 32 female teachers), the English language revision questions within the 9th and 10th grade textbooks, and questions included in the 1st semester final exams in 2018 for 9th and 10th grades. To achieve the goals of the study, the researchers developed an analytical card for the revision questions and the exams papers prepared by teachers. Results indicated that the questions of teachers' final exams’ papers based on Bloom's taxonomy, remembering level had the highest relative average with a percentage of (30.75 %) and the analysis level had the lowest level with a percentage of (4.07%). Results also indicated convergent percentages among the revision questions, where both the comprehension and the application levels had the highest frequencies with a percentage of (26.56%). Moreover, results indicated no statistical significant differences, at the level of analyzes, between the questions of the final exams and the textbooks revision questions. However,, statistical significant differences were indicated between the frequencies and the percentages of the analyzed questions of the final exams and the textbooks for grade 9 and grade 10 and the highest was the remembering level with percentages of (17.19%) for the remembering within the textbook revision questions and (30.75%) for teachers' final exams. By way of concluding, this study highlights several recommendations, among which the Ministry of Education is advised to benefit from the results of such a study in developing the English language textbook.

Keywords

Final examinations, revision questions, English language, textbook, Bloom’s taxonomy.

References

• Abdelhadi, N. (2001). An introduction to educational measurement and evaluation and its use in the field of classroom teaching (2nd Ed). Amman, Jordan: Dar Wa'el for Publication.
• Abderrazzaq, S. (2003) Developing editorial questions formulation and exams construction skills for all educational stages. (1st ed). Cairo, Egypt: Dar Alqahirah Lilkitab.
• Aldhahir, Z., Tamerjian, J., & Jawdat, E. (2002). Assessment and evaluation principles in education. Cairo-Egypt: Dar Ale'lm Lilthaqafa for Publication.
• Alkurdi, W. (1996). Critical review for Arabic language textbooks from 7th to second secondary grades in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Palestinian Curriculum Development Center. The Palestinian 1st Curriculum for Public Education. Ramallah, Palestine. P. 351-393.
• Alqatami, Y., & Alqatami, N. (2001). Teaching psychology. (1sted.). Amman, Jordan: Alshorouq Printing House for Publication.
• Alghareeb, R. (1981). Psychological-educational evaluation and assessment. (1st ed). Cairo, Egypt: Egyptian Anglo Library.
• Al-Saraireh, A. (2011). Analytical study for achievement questions' patterns among social studies and national education teachers for the 4th and 5th grade in Southern Mazar. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mu'tah University.
• Alzu'bi, M. A. (2014). The extent of adaptation Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive domain in English questions included in general secondary exams. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 67-72.
• Al-Wreikat, Y. A. A. S., Abdullah, B., & Kabilan, M. K. (2010). An evaluation of Jordanian EFL teachers' in service training courses teaching techniques effectiveness. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 18-27.
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., & Wittrock, M. (1992). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy, New York: Longman Publishing.
• Bani Abdelrahman, M. (2014). An analysis of the tenth grade English language textbooks questions in Jordan based on the revised edition of bloom's taxonomy. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(18), 139-151.
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives – Handbook 1 cognitive domain, London: Longman.
• Boit, M., Njoki, A., & Chang’ach, J. K. (2012). The influence of examinations on the stated curriculum goals. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(2), 179-182.
• Brown J. B. (1997) Textbook evaluation form. The Language Teacher. 21(10), 15-21.
• Clark, L. H., & Starr, I. (1981) Secondary & middle school teaching methods. London: Macmillan publishing, Inc.
• Cruz, E. (2004). Encyclopedia of educational technology: Bloom's revised taxonomy. Retrieved August 2015 from http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/bloomrev/
• Darwazah, A. (2000). Theory in teaching and scientifically interpreting it. (1stEd.). Amman, Jordan: Dar Alshurouq for Publication.
• Ehlers-Zavala, F. (2002). Assessment of the English Language Learner: An ESL training module. Chicago: Board of Education of the City of Chicago.
• Febrina, F., Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2019). Analysis of reading comprehension questions by using revised Bloom’s Taxonomy on higher thinking skill (HOTS). English education Journal (EFJ), 10(1), 1-15.
• Geoffrey, B., Christopher, B., Roger, F., Peter, H., & Anita, P. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign language. (E-edition) Taylor & Francis e-Library.
• Gronlund, N. E. (1977). Constructing achievement tests. Prentice- London: Hall, International INC.
• House of Commons (2008). Testing and assessment: Third report of Session 2007-08. The House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited. Testing and Assessment Volume I.
• Kahlout, A. (2000). Exam's good properties. Worksheet for the educational day for exams. Alquds Open University.
• King Abdullah II (2017). Seventh discussion paper: Developing human resources and education imperative for Jordan’s progress. The Jordan Times, King Abdullah II (2017). 7. Available at http://jordantimes.com/news/local/developing-human-resources-and-education-imperative-jordan%E2%80%99s-progress-%E2%80%94-king
• Mara'i, T., & Alhielah, M. (2005). General education methods. (2nd ed). Amman, Jordan: Dar Almasirah.
• Ministry of Education (2000). Teacher's guide in achievement tests’ construction. Amman, Jordan.
• Mousa, M. (2000). The extent to which evaluative and educational activities in Arabic language textbooks for elementary higher grades in the UAE in developing creative thinking skills. Reading and Knowledge Journal, 2, 17-63.
• Nurisma, R. (2010). An analysis of reading questions in English e-book entitled “developing English competencies for grade XI”. The Learning University, University Nigeria Malang. Available on http://library.um.ac.id
• Olimat, M. (2015). Analyzing action pack textbooks' questions according to revised bloom taxonomy. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(28), 152-159.
• Shbair, H. (2003). Evaluating practical activities in science for the 6th grade. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Faculty of Education, The Islamic University in Gaza.
• Shehatah, H. (1998). Educational curriculum: Theory and application. Cairo: Arab Institution Library for Book.
• Lenski, S. D., Ehlers‐Zavala, F., Daniel, M. C., & Sun‐Irminger, X. (2006). Assessing English‐Language learners in mainstream classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 60(1), 24-34.
• Taghi, J. (2009). The importance of classroom assessment and evaluation in educational system. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2009). INTI University College, Malaysia.
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2006). Understanding by design: A framework for effecting curricular development and assessment. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.