IMPLEMENTATION OF AUGMENTED REALITY TECHNOLOGY IN NATURAL SCIENCES LEARNING OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO OPTIMIZE THE STUDENTS’ LEARNING RESULT

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 30 - 38, 31.12.2017

Ali Fakhrudın Sri Yamtınah Riyadi Rıyadı

Abstract

In this research, the researcher developed new innovation in natural sciences learning of elementary school by implementing augmented reality technology. The method that used in this research was research and development method based on Borg and Gall theory which consists of ten stages: 1) research and information collecting, 2) planning, 3) develop preliminary form of product, 4) preliminary field testing, 5) main product revision, 6) main field testing, 7) operational product revision, 8) operational field testing, 9) final product revision, 10) dissemination and implementation. The result of this research is learning media of natural sciences learning in elementary school by utilizing augmented reality technology. Based on the implementation of experiment, it is obtained the data that learning process using augmented reality which is developed can optimize the students’ learning result.

Keywords

Augmented reality, learning result, research and development, natural sciences of elementary school, learning media.

References

• Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
• Ball, Deborah Loewenberg and Forzani, Francesca M.. 2009. The Work of Teaching and the Challenge for Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 2009; 60; 497.
• Belawati, Tian, dkk. (2003). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
• Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Students' online interactive patterns inaugmented reality-based inquiry activities. Journal Computers & Education, 78, 97-108.
• Depdiknas. (2008). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Dikmenum. Depdiknas.
• Dimyati & Mujiono. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
• Education For All Global Monitoring Report. (2011). Diperoleh 10 April 2016 dari http://www.Unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/pdf/gmr2011-efa-development-index.pdf
• Elango, P. (2013). Sistem Pemulihan Lembaran Kerja Bagi Nombor Negatif Berasaskan Realiti Luasan (AR2WN2). (Phd), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
• Fleck, S., & Simon, G. (2013). An Augmented Reality Environment for Astronomy Learning in Elementary Grades An Exploratory Study. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2534903.2534907
• Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P. & Borg, W.R. (2003). Educational Research An Introduction 7 th Ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Hamalik, Oemar. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Bumu Aksara.
• Harapan, Nazarudin Syafaat. (2012). Pemograman Aplikasi Mobile Smartphone dan Tablet PC Berbasis Android. Bandung: Informatika.
• Harlen, W. (2006). Purpose and procedures for assesing science process skill. ProQuest. Assesment in education, 6 (1), pp 129-144.
• Harre, Rom. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
• Irham, M. dan Wiyani, N. A. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan: Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Media.
• Isjoni. (2013). Cooperative Learning. Bandung: Alfabeta.
• Isnaningsih & D. S. Bimo. (2013). Penerapan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) Discovery berorientasi Keterampilan Proses Sains untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2 (2), 136-141.
• Kozhevnikov, M., & Thornton, R. (2006). Real-Time Data Display, Spatial Visualization Ability, and Learning Force and Motion Concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 1.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0361-0
• Kucuk, S., Yilmaz, R. M., & Goktas, Y. (2014). Augmented Reality for Learning English: Achievement, Attitude and Cognitive Load Levels of Students. Journal Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 39 (176).
• Lamounier, E., Bucioli, A., Cardoso, A., Andrade, A., & Soares, A. (2010). On the use of Augmented Reality techniques in learning and interpretation of caridiologic data. Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2010 (Vol. 1, pp. 2451-2454).
• Leach, J., Driver, R., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1997). A study of progression in learning about 'the nature of science': Issues of conceptualisation and methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 147-166.
• Majid, Abdul. (2007). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
• Majid, Ambul. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
• Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computer & Education, 57, 1893-1906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003
• Medina, E., Chen, Y.-C., & Weghorst, S. (2008). Understanding Biochemistry with Augmented Reality.Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007, 4235-4239. Danakorn, N., Noor Dayana, A., & Norafffandy, Y. (2013). Mobile Augmented Reality: The potential for education. 13th International Educational Technology Conference, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 657-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.385
• Mulyasa. (2010). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidik (KTSP). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Nazarudin. (2007). Manajemen Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Teras.
• Nor, F.S., Noor, D.A.H, & Noorafandi, Y. (2015). A Review of Research on Augmented Reality in Education: Advantages and Applications. International Education Studies Journal, 8, 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p1
• Nurina, Irma. (2015). Penerapan Lembar Kerja Siswa berbasis Penugasan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Minat Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. (Tesis). Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang.
• Programe for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2009). PISA 2009 Plus Result Performance of 15-years-old in reading, mathematics and science for 10 additional participants. Diperoleh 10 April 2016 dari http://nces.ed.gov/survey/pisa.
• Sagala, Syaiful. (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
• Samatowa, Utsman. (2006). Bagaimana Membelajarkan IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
• Sanjaya, Wina. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan, Jenis, Metode dan Prosedur Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.
• Sri Sulistyorini. (2007). Model Pembelajaran IPA Sekolah Dasar dan Penerapannya dalam KTSP. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
• Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers' hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• Sudarwan Danim. (1995). Media Komunikasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
• Sudjana, Nana. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
• Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan Research and Development. Bandung: Alfabeta
• Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
• Susanto, Ahmad. (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
• Treagust, D. F. & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: a discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297-328.