ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES ABOUT THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN LIBYAN CONTEXT

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 40 - 49, 30.06.2017

Ahmed Baba Sibel Ersel Kaymakamoğlu

Abstract

This study was primarily conducted to explore the nature of current professional development programs implemented for secondary school teachers in the context of Libya. For this purpose, four purposively selected English language teachers were interviewed to explore their views regarding the effectives of the professional development activities and their supervisors. The findings of this investigation indicated that Libyan supervisors are doing well in terms of implementing the professional development programs in their respective schools. However, teachers reported that they receive very minimal support from the government although it has a line up in-service training programs for faculty and staff. This implies that school supervisors should serve as the prime movers or leaders in the design, delivery and evaluation of professional development programs with the support of the local and/or national government of Libya.

Keywords

English language teachers, professional development program, in-service training.

References

• Bakay, G. (2007) Determining the education needs of teachers in the preparation of annual, unite and daily plans, Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 2. 2.
• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S. & Firth, A. (2005). The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning? Research evidence in education library, EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London.
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Çağanağa, Ç.K. &Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2015).Developing with residual practice in EFL classrooms, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Special issue, 2, 147-151.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2014). Beliefs and practice of EFL teachers: Constructivist or Traditional, International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 1(3), 216-224.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. & Hassan, K. M. B. (2015). Perceptions of the undergraduate EFL learners studying at Salahaddin University regarding vocabulary learning strategies, International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE), 4(2), 24-35.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2015). A study on EFL teachers’ beliefs-practice relationship regarding gender, International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports &Science Education(IJTASE),4(2), 21-32.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S.E. &Atmaca, M. (2016). Learner beliefs in language learning: A study on the effects of context in learners’ perceptions, International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE),5(2), 38-44.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S. E., Çağanağa, Ç. K. (2016). An alternative model to professional development in multicultural EFL classrooms: Cooperative management and residual practice, Education Applications and Development II, Mafaldo Carmo (Ed.), 3-11, inScience Press.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2010) Exploring the fit between the EFL teachers’ beliefs and classroom practice in Cyprus Turkish secondary state schools regarding Constructivist and Traditional perspectives, unpublished EdD. Thesis, University of Leicester.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2017). Science teachers’ conceptualizations for the development of the professional development programs, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3301-3314.
• Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2017). Examining the guidance and counseling students’ perceptions about English language learning beliefs, Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 12(2), 47-57.
• Lindahl, R. A. (2010). Differences in principals’ leadership behavior in high and low performing schools.Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(4), 34-45.
• Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S. & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 26 (3), 237–257.
• Polk, J. A. (2011). Traits of effective teachers: Arts education policy review, quantitative and qualitative research, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. 23-30, 107.
• Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researches.London: Sage, 45-54, 149-181.
• Thorn, G. (2007).Peer Coaching Overview. Accessed January 2, 2013 , from www.marshallgoldsmithlibrary.com.